Monday, November 23, 2015

Quinault Tribal Leader Gives Blessing Over Bigfoot Conference


Even though all races and ethnic backgrounds are represented somewhere in the bigfoot community, none of them get associated with the creature of legend more so than Native Americans. Many tribes have their own names and stories for these bigfoot creatures, and there is a long history of sightings within the Native community. At the recent Sasquatch Summit, Quinault Tribal Elder Butch Pope gave this amazing blessing over the event.


103 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. And after the blessing they indulged in much firewater.

      Delete
    2. FFS! Bless Deez Nutts turd sucker FFS!

      Delete
    3. ^ Put your other hand where we can see it.^

      Delete
    4. There are over 100 Native American names for the creature commonly known as Sasquatch. If you plug these names into the US government’s geographical names and informational system, you’ll get 2,300 places in America named with reference to these Native names. On a map, these places follow the summit ridges & peaks of all the mountain ranges in America, particularly in Oregon and Washington. The Native place names and contemporary reports of Sasquatch follow the summit ridges and peaks of the coastal range, the summit ridges and peaks of the Cascade range, and in particularly, the highest density is between the three mountains of Mount St Helens, Mount Adams and Mount St Rainier… With the triangle within those three places having the highest density of Native American place names that have reference to these creatures.

      Delete
    5. Hello Vegas my friend!! And what's up FFS!!!!

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. And now... Continuing Turd-Boy's daily psychological evaluation;

      According to Smith (1976), a common analytic interpretation is that the excrement symbolically represents the penis and that the presence of the fecal matter serves as a defense against castration anxiety. Castration anxiety is the fear of emasculation in both the literal and metaphorical sense. Castration anxiety is an overwhelming fear of damage to, or loss of, the penis; one of Sigmund Freud's earliest psychoanalytic theories.

      In the metaphorical sense, castration anxiety refers to the idea of feeling or being insignificant; there is a need to keep one's self from being dominated; whether it be socially or in a relationship. Symbolic castration anxiety refers to the fear of being degraded, dominated or made insignificant, usually an irrational fear where the person will go to extreme lengths to save their pride and/or perceives trivial things as being degrading making their anxiety restrictive and sometimes damaging. This can also tie in with literal castration anxiety in fearing the loss of virility or sexual dominance.

      Considering the above, and Turd-Boy's behaviour, one can relate to a superiority complex, this being a psychological defense mechanism in which a person's feelings of superiority counter or conceal his or her feelings of inferiority. In short, he's a little man with big issues who needs to feel good about himself. The amount he invests on this blog, merely outlines the extent of these issues.

      Delete
    8. >>. If you plug these names into the US government’s geographical names and informational system.....

      Care to provide a link to that Joe? I would like to confirm that myself instead of just taking your word for it.

      Delete
    9. You need a link for a Government's information system? Like I've told you before, pick up a book. In this case it's Henry Franzoni.

      Delete
    10. Neat piece of info. Iktomi. I am well aware of close to 200 hundred names the Native tribes gave to these forest creatures, most reference Hairy Giant Forest Dweller and were looked upon as another tribe that had there place and the natives had there place. The tribe from my birthplace was the Chippewa which I believe have a center in the Saginaw, MI ( as well as a huge casino called Soaring Eagle in Mt. Pleasant, MI ). Someday soon on a trip to Michigan I need to stop in there and see what they have to say and how the Michigan Forest Giants related to their culture.

      Oh by the way.
      Iktomi in native language means person of great knowledge and wisdom.
      Chuck

      Delete
    11. Hey Chuck, I'd be most interested to read what you learn as soon as you do. One of the major arguments of so called "sceptics", is that this topic is only 50-60 years old. Someone suggested yesterday that I read Abominable Science... One of this book's main arguments is this very piece of misinformation.

      Delete
    12. ^ ... exhibits all the signs of castration angst ...truth is though,he IS very insignificant...and so the cycle continues.

      Delete
    13. Note the way Joe tries to deflect away from actually providing any evidence to back up his ludicrous claims...attempting ridicule rather than supporting his unfounded statements is his loser stance.

      Delete
    14. 7:23... One day you'll grow up from the typical school yard "I'm not, you are" arguments, and devise something from your own creativity.

      7:27... I've presented the source, it is now your requirement to prove it innacurate... That's how this works. And I have no issue in calling you a psycho-nerd.

      See ya later... Enjoy!

      Delete
    15. ^ Hahahaha...I`ve brought you scurrying out from your cess-pit heap of bedding to show to us all your "castration angst" in action...insignificance is your forte.

      hahahhahahhahahahha

      Delete
    16. Yes,you`ve brought forth a desperate comment from a defender of a desperate corner...pity his wife couldn`t muster the response she so desperately needed from him before she left for a man of real substance.

      Delete
    17. Is this the website, Joe? Care to demonstrate how to "plug in" names? Or did you not do this, but just boasted about something you read?

      http://nhd.usgs.gov/gnis.html

      Delete
    18. It should also be pointed out, Joe, that you did not indicate that you simply read about this, you made it sound like you had "plugged in" the names and performed the correlation. You, in your typical plagiarizing way, seemed to have no problem taking credit for it.

      Delete
    19. 7:48... You come across as having far more severe issues than castration anxiety.

      Post a bit of truth and see the pseudoscpetics come a running... Dmaker, here's a link with a quick image of the map to which native names can be attributed;
      http://disinfo.com/2013/10/sasquatch-seatco-indians-conversation-henry-franzoni/

      ... The Indian names have been translated however. I made it pretty clear that this is the work of Henry Franzoni. It's not so much my plagiarism as it is your dense literary skills... Again.

      Delete
    20. 7:51... I'm really not sure what the heck you're babbling about??? Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    21. "Over 4000 Indian place name coordinates compatible with Google Earth
      Over 60 maps providing detailed coverage of place names across North America
      Many Indian legends presented, interpreted, and explained"
      http://www.henryfranzoni.com/itsos.html

      "A Scientist and Engineer, Henry Faranzoni puts it altogether, making sense of recent sightings, ancient Indian legends, place names and alternate theories of physics. He is the author of a very interesting book available though his website titled In the Spirit of Seatco.

      Henry Franzoni is a “Tribal Data Steward” for the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. He works for the four treaty tribes, the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, the Nez Perce Tribe, The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation. He tracks Salmon Steelhead and lampreys in the Columbia River for these tribes with a computer tracking system he designed himself. Apparently he spends a lot of time on Indian reservations and gets to talk to the local Indians about one of his favorite subjects: Sasquatch. I contacted him and he was gracious enough to agree to an interview, which devolved into a rambling conversation over a week’s time. I hope you enjoy it."

      Delete
    22. http://www.henryfranzoni.com/In%20the%20Spirit%20of%20Seatco%201-37.pdf

      ... And pages, 34, 35, 36 and 37 in the above like ^

      Delete
    23. As usual dmaker obliterates Joe. Tell us something Joe, why not just show us how you plugged in those characters on that website? But just like dmaker said, you didnt, and you are just repeating what someone else said. Do you ever get tired of being shown to be a liar and a fraud? Dont worry too much though, dmaker and daniel will always be there to smear the egg on your face.

      Delete
    24. No... As usual Dmaker posts nothing but uneducated cynicism, and his cheerleader comes to cheer him on like just another hater. Do yourself a favour and actually read someone else's comments for once, open the links and learn something. You hang on the word of other people and persist with questions and insults, totally ignorant that they've been taken apart in the links that proceed you. You are a beyond stupid, and if you realised how much you embarrasse yourself, you'd hit real rock bottom.

      Henry Franzoni sends his love.

      : )

      Delete
    25. well then show us Joe? show us how you typed characters into that website and what results you were able to obtain. But you didnt do it, you just simply copied what someone else had said. Prove dmaker wrong, show us Joe. Or prove him right and keep doing what your doing.

      Delete
    26. I don't have to, Henry Franzoni has... This what alluded to comments ago. I've even posted his book to reference what I'm talking about.

      Now you tell me something, how many of your arguments does that obliterate?

      Delete
    27. ^ None of them as you still can`t verify the ludicrous claim that bigfoot exists...how many years is that now ?

      Delete
    28. 10:58... And this is what I'm talking about, you silly little hater. It's not the data that I reference which is your focus, if that was the case you'd have addressed it (nobody is that stupid to persists after four-five comments of explaining); your focus is me. You've been upset by me too many times to count, and you're more concerned with my credibility and my first hand experiences... That's some serious butthurt-itude right there. It makes no difference who's name is to the research, it's the research that's important, and what you should be preoccupied with, kid.

      If you hate me that much and want to get at me, go get an adult to source you a counter argument against what I post, you silly little hater.

      : )

      Delete
    29. 11:17... So you lost on this argument, and now it's back to your classic circular reasoning logical fallacy, you really do contribute to this ego I have, I'll admit that.

      If Sasquatch doesn't exist, it doesn't manifest in physical sign. Unfortunately for you, you can't get any better form of physical evidence than forensics.

      Delete
    30. And Joe proves to all of us how spineless he is, and his extensive lack of knowledge. Notice that Joe couldnt show the procedure that dmaker required. So you tried to make everyone believe that you did these things 1st hand, but in reality you just copied and pasted someone elses work. You didnt know if it was accurate, you just pasted it. This is the problem with the bigfoot field. People exactly like Joe, who make up things, post irrelevant crap, and then claim it as fact and 1st hand knowledge. Your lack of common sense is both funny and sad at the same time. No wonder dmaker and daniel dont comment here much anymore. Crushing your arguments is like crushing an ant. Your a sad little man Joe, and your time is running out. Tick Tock...Tick tock

      Delete
    31. Again... Here's that link that demonstrates what I'm talking about is factual;
      http://www.henryfranzoni.com/In%20the%20Spirit%20of%20Seatco%201-37.pdf
      ... Thanks for playing!

      Delete
    32. Yes joe, you just copied a link rom another mans site. You didnt use the data yourself like you implied. You told us how we could go and run those figures ourselves like you made it seem that you had done. Yet you didnt. You lied. You made yourself look like a fool. Dmaker completely tore you down on this one chump

      Delete
    33. Henry franzoni has definetly been sipping on Joergs swag juice

      Delete
    34. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    35. "IktomiMonday, November 23, 2015 at 7:00:00 AM PST
      You need a link for a Government's information system? Like I've told you before, pick up a book. In this case it's Henry Franzoni."

      This was three comments after my initial usage. What's very, very funny... Is that you hang on the word of Dmaker so much, that you followed his lead in not realising I'd posted its reference comments previous.

      Can you remember when you called Dmaker's comments "almost spiritual"? You certainly are a creepy little fanatic when it comes to him and Daniel. You'd follow them jumping off the cliff if they told you it was a good idea, ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    36. You didn't mention the book until someone asked for a link. Then you immediately got rude and then mentioned the book. Prior to that, you presented it with no mention of source material. Like you always do.

      Delete
    37. Donald = anon = cliff = weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

      Delete
    38. I see on Mar 13, you presented these comments as your own again. You are even complimented for "neat info". Again, no correction and no source material.

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.ca/2015/03/this-may-be-youngest-bigfoot-hunter-ever.html


      And here on some BBC documentary tv show site, we see these words again in some horrible run on paragraph. Not sure what's up with that one. Did you lift this straight from the book you mentioned, Joe?

      http://bloooo.com/2015/09/bigfoot-monster-mystery-bbc-documentary-full-documentary/

      Delete
    39. something fishy about Dmaker. He comes on here and gets schooled by Iktomi time and time again and yet keeps coming back for more
      Odd duck

      Joe

      Delete
    40. Dmaker once again schools joe. Its a thing of beauty. poor little joergy

      Delete
    41. LOL, I see on Mar 13th when you plagiarized these words that you added a little, "Just saying!" afterwards. Oh, does that make the words your own somehow Joe? What a joke.

      Delete
    42. dmaker destroyed joe above. I mean absolutely crushed him. And yes Joerg, it was spiritual when dmaker called you by your true name (joerg). I pray about it every night along side the shrine of used butt diapers and your moms used napkins. give it up joerg. Its over. Your time has run out.

      Delete
    43. What a laughably desperate little angle this is to take, dear Donald... You sure do make me cringe when you get like this. Where have a claimed that the information is off the back of my own research? Are you so desperately butthurt that you forget that anything we discuss is sourced from somewhere? I've come to this blog and stated a million facts about the topic, might I suggest that this comes from someone who needed to ask the JREF forum to explain an article in Nature? Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Anyone can rock up here and ask you anything of the mantras you post in opposition of the subject matter; not one will be yours, Donald. And I'll be sure you demonstrate your hypocrisy as soon as you give me the chance.

      Within three comments, the third being the very first time in this comment section that someone asked me where the information came from, I stated it. Eleven comments and an hour and a quarter later, you query my own methods of "plugging in"? You ******* dense ****, ha ha ha ha!!

      Anyway... How's a counter argument on that coming? D'you know, when you haven't got anyone to ad hominem on the facts I present, you really do just get as bitter with me as the next average troll.

      : )

      Delete
    44. 5:02... Did Donald get around to showing me the information I presented is inaccurate? Ha ha ha ha!! Please tell us how "spiritual" Donald is to you again, this aspect of your psychology is fascinating. Oh... And just a recap, how does it feel to have your best argument regarding diaper butts kicked back at you every day of your life? I mean, it's only caused you a three year meltdown, I wonder what was more detrimental you, the diaper butt or the bet?

      Delete
    45. Oh Donaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaald???? You have a counter argument to acquire???????

      : )

      Delete
    46. The first time you used these words, you did not source. Even when complimented on the information, you did not source. You only sourced today because someone asked you. And then you to be a pr i ck about it in your answer.

      Try getting an original thought and then you won't have to constantly get caught trying to pass of the thoughts of others as your own.

      Pathetic twonk.

      Delete
    47. Yet within three comments... The first time someone asked me where this information came from, I referenced it. Donald, I expect the densest of numpties around here to fob their shortcomings off on others like a spoiled little brat, but maybe I gave you a little more credit than you deserve, ha ha ha!!

      An original thought eh? Donald... Please tell everyone where you get your best arguments from? Ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    48. Yes, yes, within three comments. Yet on Mar 13 when you pasted these comments as your own, and it went unasked, oddly you did not offer any source. You happily basked in the compliment you received. You chose not to disclose the source.

      You can keep mumbling about in only three comments, but it's entirely transparent. If no one had of asked, you would not have sourced it. Just like last time you claimed it as your own.

      And then you have the f u ck ing audacity to snub someone off and tell them to go read a book as if you have some moral high ground while you're plagiarizing someone else's thoughts and efforts.

      You really are totally pathetic.

      Delete
    49. In fact, the only transparency is in the manner in which I was happy to reference where my information came from at the very first time of being asked... How's that information going for you Donald? You're one of these JREF minions who are advised to attack the characters of people and not the information they use, right? You regularly use the lie that there is no cultural or physical evidence to support such an idea, why can't you grow a pair of ***** and just admit this is why you're so upset?

      I'm sorry... Would you like to post extracts from March 13th where I have claimed it's my own? You see, the real audacity here is you can't and probably have never been able to think for yourself, let alone read a book... And here in lies another means literary shortfall;
      "You need a link for a Government's information system? Like I've told you before, pick up a book. In this case it's Henry Franzoni."
      ... Since you want to focus on trivial BS as opposed to tacking the subject matter, not only have I stated that I got the information from a book, but I've also started who wrote it.

      Am I getting you all upset, Donald? Do you want to let everyone know about the time you had to ask JREF to explain Denisovans?

      Delete
    50. I'm not upset, Joe.

      When someone posts something and does not use quotes or mention where the information came from, then it is understood that they are claiming it as their own.

      Sure, you owned up as soon as it looked like you might be caught. But in the past, when not asked about the source, you made no effort to source the material.

      Surely, even one as dense and unoriginal as you understands that not using quotes and not sourcing the material is going to lead people to think you are the source. You know this. Your pathetic little attempts to try to retain some credibility because you owned up when caught, accomplish nothing. As do your equally pathetic attempts to change the topic.

      You are a small, nasty, petty little man, Joe.

      Delete
    51. Please, Joe, stop threatening to do something for a change and just do it. Why don't you link to whatever embarrassing moment on JREF you think happened.

      Please, I would love to see this. Come on, you little sissy. Do it.

      Delete
    52. Oh you come across as nothing BUT upset, dear Donald. "Might be caught"? Ha ha ha ha ha!!! You seem to have a little issue with someone being grateful that I shared information, Donald? Is that what the issue is here? You have your creepy little cheerleader that thinks whatever runs off your finger tips is "spiritual", why aren't you content with that?

      Donald, so many times I've taken your own logic and cartwheels of diversion and turned them back at you. The amount of times you thought you were clever in using scientific theory to side step basic accumulated data that can't lie, only to get nailed at it when the chips are down is incredible, but anyone can take your latest meltdown and turn it against you. You see, any words or ideas can be said to be stolen at any one time. Any original idea is considered intellectual property, protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions are. Almost every single form of expression has copyright protection as long as it is recorded. Where were you referencing Popper when you got falsifiability rammed back down your throat? You can get very silly with this, but silly is you all over when you can't address something that gets you all flustered, right?

      Oh, you know I don't have to show you where you had to run to your heroes when you didn't understand a journal that you so regularly reference as a scientific standard to abide by. Citing a journal as one of only a few sources to listen to when it comes to paleoanthropology, when you don't understand that very thing when it indeed comes around, is as audacious as anything you can shake a stick at, dear Donald.

      Delete
    53. Yeah, blah, blah, blah, you plagiarized. You know it. I know it. Everyone here knows it. Despite your pathetic attempts at rambling justification.

      So, you don't have anything to link to at JREF? Just another empty threat from you? Figures.

      Delete
    54. Anyway Donald, it was fun having this little dance with you... Pop along tomorrow... I know you will, you like to circle when you get all upset.

      : p

      Delete
    55. Skookum is the Chinook name for bigfoot and there are tons of places that were named after bigfoot if you'll only care to take a look

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinook_Jargon_place_names

      once again Dmaker gets royally schooled and it is a thing of beauty !

      Joe

      Delete
    56. Joerg begging dmaker to return tomorrow. Sorry Joergy, dmaker isnt coming back. And sure there are plenty of places named after bigfoot. Just like there are many places named after adolf hitler, hotdogs, restaurants, etc. Sooner or later a bunch of loons will name a town or something similar in the name of something ridiculous, such as bigfoot. So your argument holds no water. Dmaker destroyed Joerg once again. Its a thing of beauty, and spiritual. Got any of your moms used napkins joerg?

      Delete
    57. He isn't coming back because he got schooled and ran away with his tail between his legs or should i say his fins

      Joe

      Delete
    58. Keep telling yourself that. Joerg was destroyed just like normal. And now he is comitting crimes. Blatant plagarism. Im gonna turn him in to the cops!

      Delete
    59. ^ Hi dressmaker , got any Cry Baby Extra Sour Gumballs left ?

      Joe

      Delete
    60. "Holds no water"? 400 mountains as old as the earth that have been named after Sasquatch, that happen to have contemporary reports to support? I might add... Adolf Hitler, hot dogs and restaurants exist, or have done at some point; are you now admitting you're wrong?

      What a creepy ******* little dweeb you are, notice how Donald and Daniel appear to want nothing to do with you? Notice they never appear to want a single thing to do with your comments?

      That's gotta hurt.

      Delete
    61. Actually Joe, nobody could be that crazy. You could be right, it might actually be Donald.

      Delete
    62. You're supposed to source in the post you quoted, Mr. Plagiarizer, not three posts later when people start busting your chops over not sourcing/referencing.

      Amateur.

      Delete
    63. I wondered when you were gonna turn up Danny? Would you like me to go back on any one of a thousand comment sections here where you haven't referenced your ideas?

      Oh... And how's the bet going for you?

      Delete
    64. I don't want you to do anything. You can't even perform basic functions correctly. Have fun seeking attention!

      Delete
    65. Daniel And Dmaker love coming back on here just to get schooled in epic fashion time after time. They'll never learn


      Joe

      Delete
    66. Joe is down right desperate for daniels attention. Time after time Joe tries to bring up the bet he lost, because he hopes it will drawl daniel into debate or argument. Sorry joergy, daniel isnt falling for it. You lose. AHHH HAHAHAHA

      Delete
    67. I don't know if you realised, but I've just schooled your beloved Daniel and if you didn't know, Sykes says Zana was a Yeti.

      Delete
  2. I spoke with ShawnE. We're getting some software installed to be able to identify and block his IP.Enough is Enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay "FFS!" I'm asking you nicely and directly - what do those initials stand for? Just curious.

      Delete
    2. Curious, they stand for "For F***'s Sakes". Eva did tell you.

      Delete
    3. and curious stands for Bi-curious. And eva stands for transgender

      Delete
    4. Curious and strange way of using that phrase but hey - if he/she is proud of it - use away.

      Delete
    5. Lol i some times wonder what some people think when they come on here for the first time :) xx

      Delete
  3. Marauding ni ggers rape and kill white Mother and wife. She was 12 weeks pregnant with another baby. When are white men going to stand up and organize. We need to start hanging ni ggers again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. tham muzrats not likin tham folks

      Delete
  4. Marauding ni ggers rape and kill white Mother and wife. She was 12 weeks pregnant with another baby. When are white men going to stand up and organize. We need to start hanging ni ggers again.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/11/23/18-year-old-arrested-held-on-murder-charge-in-amanda-blackburn-case/?intcmp=hpbt3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is the clown that needs banning should that indeed be the case, 8:02.

      Delete
    2. Freedom of speech is not a licence for racists to spread racist propaganda.

      Delete
    3. yes it actually is. You sure sound like an american liberal, and not a welsh pansy. Your an american arent you joe

      Delete
    4. Please tell us all the people I allegedly am... Tell us about the magic airforce base, you whacko. Such a tough guy aren't you? Tell me, if you practice "freedom of speech", why not post your name?

      : )

      Delete
    5. 11;00

      What utter nonsense...you don`t post your real name so any anonymous is just as real as the moniker (in your case multiple monikers) you use.

      Delete
    6. His real name is Joerg Hensiek

      Delete
    7. Ive got Joe sippin on my Joerg Juice, my Joerg Juice. Ive got joe sippin on my joerg juice, my joerg juice.

      Delete
    8. Yes... Who else am I allegedly? There's a list apparently?

      Delete
    9. ive got joe sippin on my swag juice, my swag juice. I got joe sippin on my swag juice, my swag juice.

      Delete
    10. NSA got da lists, its for U SAFETY !!!

      Delete