Thursday, October 8, 2015

Classic Breakdown: The Malaysian Yeti


In this classic breakdown video, Phil takes a look at the Malaysian Yeti footage. Uploaded in 2009, it is claimed to have been shot in a forest in Kuala Lumpur. Were these campers able to capture footage of an actual yeti? Check out what Phil has to say about the video:


41 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. poop - turd - but always poop next to a tree to mark where U have been

      Delete
  2. Matt k= Phil's lap dog.. .here boy
    Hahahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  3. Phil's breakdown of the Patterson-Gimlin Film was incredible. He tore it up like no one I have ever seen. It's game over for the PGF.

    Phil has a great way of finding and explaining problems and inconsistencies that most miss.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 5:00 - you sound like you are having your own breakdown suggesting the PGF is somehow fake. Prove to us beyond any shadow of doubt it is fake. in court that is what you'd have to do for any judge or jury to believe you.
      You'd have your own breakdown on the stand . Schooled !

      Joe

      Delete
    2. ^ Wrong

      in court you would need to prove it existed

      smoked as a kipper boyo

      Delete
    3. Watch Phil's PGF breakdown. He pretty much discredits it once and for all.

      Delete
    4. @6:05. haa haaa haa Lol,
      that was way to easy .GOOD JOB!
      AND JOTOMI & LIL BITCH JOE , GOT KIPPERED AS ALWAYS.

      AC collins. ;-)

      Delete
    5. ....Relax fellas, OP is just messing with you....I don't think Phil Poling ever did a breakdown on the PGF....

      Delete
    6. All very much realised... Phil Poling is actually an enthusiast. The troll doesn't have much else apart from disinformation. This is Poling's stance on the footage;
      "It’s been 40 years of examination, and bickering back and forth, and we’re not one step closer to a solution than the day it was shot. Don’t you all think it is time to put the damn thing in a can, stick it in a drawer, and forget about it?”
      ... But apart fork openly contesting MK Davis' analysis, there is no video by him where he has debunked the PGF.

      6:05... You would prove it existed based on the frequency of evidence. For Sasquatch, there is every type of evidence short of modern type specimen that supports three whole databases of reports (the people who have actually come forward) that transitions thousands of years of cultural acknowledgment.

      Acute (AC) Collins is angry because he was identified as the leader of the toilet pizza eating club; a strange group of perverts who very much like to leave their signature calling card; a lone pepperoni on a toilet seat.

      Delete
    7. 6:05- please. I don't have to go to court to prove it exists. I know it exists .i am fine with my beliefs but it's skeptrolls like you who have the problem and constantly come on here and say it's all bollocks . I don't need to take anything to court, you are more upset about people like me who believe in it than anything else. i could care less if you don't agree but i do care when buffoons like you come on here and troll the site with you lame comments . Please disappear and go somewhere else and let us more educated types discuss something you obviously don't care about.
      Does the smoked kipper come with cream cheese ?

      Joe

      Delete
    8. ^ Shine My Shoes "BOY" !!
      HAAA HAAA HAA!

      AC collins

      Delete
    9. Shine your eyes more like... And go read a book.

      Delete
    10. ^ wants people he can`t handle to go away...it ain`t gonna happen,Joe...just like you have no bigfoot proof.

      And never will...coz bigfoot is multi-dimensional doncha know and super-human smart...hahahahahaha

      Delete
    11. Oh I don't want you to go anywhere... I like using you as the archetype cyber loon around here. I've never claimed to have the proof for "Bigfoot", just the physical evidence for it.

      This coming from someone who claims they are an enthusiast? Not a clever troll, are you?

      Delete
    12. ^ I`ve never,ever,professed to being an "enthusiast".

      Delete
    13. Then why did you reel off camera trap techniques to Mike B? Why are you on record claiming Sasquatch are homo erectus.

      Dense child looking for cyber attention.

      Delete
    14. when ,where and what are you jibbering about you spastic dullard?

      Delete
    15. I'm actually going to spend the next couple of hours sourcing you the thread, it was in the last couple of weeks so won't be a problem.

      Delete
    16. Here it is!!

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/gosh-this-is-beautiful-bigfoot-country.html?m=0

      ... You're DBS, right?? You frickin' twat.

      Delete
  4. MORE evidence that ALL videos of "bigfoot" (cue huge laughter effects) are utter hoaxes...ALL of them.

    You Phony Phukers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Get busy debunking these then chump;
      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI

      ... Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    2. ^Try googling tapetum lucidum in HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN, you anecdotal dolt!
      lol.

      Delete
    3. ^ if you ain't got monkey suit please sit down , you need to be schooled badly

      Joe

      Delete
    4. Got bigfoot proof?

      Oh, that's right. You can't prove that bigfoot exists.

      Delete
    5. I can't prove "Bigfoot" exists... I can prove that an unclassified bipedal primate, twice the size of normal human primates are leaving it's impression on the environment of the US;
      http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints

      Acute Collins... Did you get around to seeing hose Harvey Pratt forensic drawings? Those look like perfectly human eyes to me, chump.

      Delete
    6. ^ Hahaha

      You foolish boy...people draw faces all the time...does that make them real ? No,of course it doesn`t.

      You smelly boy.

      Delete
    7. How about pioneering Forensic artists with people who have gone through a witness screening process? You've been told before, listen to the people who have seen a Sasquach; to which a percentage report normal human eyeballs.

      Now shut up and sit down.

      Delete
    8. Harvey Pratt hasn`t seen a bigfoot...nor has D.Paulides who commissioned him to do the drawings...essentially,all they have done,is created an image from what a person has described...they`ve not seen or had any encounter themselves.

      Delete
    9. And your point is???

      (Sigh)

      You are still being provided with a source of reports that have predominantly human features, with human eyeballs. This is something that David Paulides has always stated; that the plethora of sightings he's investigated were all VERY HUMAN.

      Delete
    10. ^ you are so brain dead you truly have no clue of the implacation of a homo sapien sapien LACKING a taptum lucidum!! well nevermind as you're far
      too stupid to learn from your mental superior in ALL THINGS ,,"ME" !

      AC collins ,, so easy !

      Delete
    11. You lack the capacity to fathom that reports are not only spilt between two major types of Sasquatch (gorilla like and human like), and that a plethora of these sightings report normal human eyeballs, and I'm "brain dead"?

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! What a prized prat you are.

      Delete
  5. I'll say this - Poling may be a Bigfoot enthusiast but at least he is objective enough to call out the hoaxes which is more than I can say for many Bigfoot believers. Plus I like his jazzy entry theme.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. parabreakdown is without a doubt the best video analist in the realm of sasquatchary bar none !
      And. shawn and Matt. are doing a fine job!!

      TEAM HOMO'S ,,,#1. !

      Delete
    2. ^ he`s not a patch on Thinker Thunker though

      Delete