Friday, October 9, 2015

Classic Breakdown: The Calgary Bigfoot Video


So this isn't exactly a breakdown video, but it's still worth another watch. This is the Calgary Bigfoot video, where a family caught footage of what appears to be a reddish brown bigfoot creature walking into the woods. Phil takes a look at the video and zooms and stabilizes it for us for a better look. Think it's the real deal?


24 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. I haven't seen the breakdown, but I most certainly think this footage is very real.

      Delete
    2. Certainly not a bear. Bears run off on four legs, not two.

      Delete
    3. It seems to move very fast. I like it too IK.

      ~ Chick

      Delete
    4. It's a bear, sitting, facing left. It gets up, turns around, walks away from the camera before disappearing left behind some trees.

      Delete
    5. was leaning towardsreal but when the child starts saying it's not human over and over well thats a red flag

      Delete
    6. Of course it isn`t real...none of them are real footage of bigfoot...not a single one.

      Delete
    7. Notice how joetomi hasn`t watched the video but believes it regardless...how gullible he shows himself to be.

      What a dick sucker.

      Delete
    8. A.C IS A BIG OLE MAD BROWN VAGINAAAAA!

      Delete
    9. I think this one is real, and Phil reserved comment because he only trashes bigfoot and he can't come up with anything to trash this one. So, he just posts it to make revenue from youtube clicks.

      Delete
    10. true double d, that and he told his lil' puppy boy to post it here ( and yes he picks the vids for his boy to post)

      Delete
    11. SO D DOVER ,WHATS UP WITH THE GRACIL JAW BONE (mandible) AND MODERN PRAMETERS FOR YOUR
      LOVELOCK SKULL ,BOYO??
      I GUESS BROCK LESNER IS NOW A BIGFOOT HUH? EXCEPT B LESNER IS WAY BIGGER 6-4 TO 5-11.
      THANK YOU !!
      ANDY WHITE. PHD
      ACcollins

      Delete
    12. 4:31... "It's not human", could imply bear? The kid could have picked up on certain suggerions from his parents, for example, his parents may have begun filming on the idea that it could have been something out of the norm and stated so.

      6:43... Yes, so you keep praying at us. How about you hurry up and find a monkey suit then kid?? It's only 46 years late.

      6:47... If you hadn't noticed, chump, this is in fact one of the pieces of footage I use in the list of video evidences that I regularly post in challenge for you to debunk;
      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
      http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
      http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
      http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
      http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
      http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
      http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
      ... You stupid boy.

      Acute Collins... The jaw in the Humboltd skull is very robust, it is in fact a key feature that supports it's prehistoric nature, you dense child. Using someone like Lesner as a model for the skull was a cardinal sin in any forensic facial reconstructionist, as even by means of an amalgamation of artistry, forensic science, anthropology, osteology, and anatomy, it is still easily the most subjective, as well as one of the most controversial techniques in the field of forensic anthropology. Also, using a robust human to model what is fundamentally a robust human's skull; not too smart. Wow... You really are that butt hurt about the whole subject aren't you? Ha ha ha!! D'you know what I think?? I think you've never amounted to anything, let alone in this subject, and you have to trash everyone else in line with your superiority complex.

      : )

      Delete
    13. Oh... And none of us know the height of the subject who had the Humboltd skull, you lying sack of ****, especially as Sasquatch heads are typically reported as seeming far smaller in proportion to their bodies. Sasquatch are very readily reported in the 6.5 feet area; this would account for the subject who's skull belongs to.

      Delete
  2. The closer it's zoomed in, the more you can tell it's a hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This has to be real...nobody hoaxes Bigfoot footage, besides, the subject is in plain view and not obstructed by foliage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. well it isn't a bear , that's 100%. So it must be a hoax or the real deal.

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
  5. It appears as though it was caught taking a "dump", before standing erect and walking away. It's not a bear, and it's not someone stuffed into a large costume. Besides, where's the cue for it to start moving

    ReplyDelete
  6. It appears to be a bigfoot taking a dump. I aggree witht he previous poster. It was a squatch taking a poo and got caught.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It appears to be a bigfoot taking a dump. I aggree witht he previous poster. It was a squatch taking a poo and got caught.

    ReplyDelete