Monday, October 12, 2015

Are There Actually Three Bigfoot In The Patterson Gimlin Film?


Veteran Sasquatch researcher Robert W. Morgan announced on the Art Bell show in 1997 his theory that there are actually multiple bigfoot in the Patterson Gimlin film. His theory is based on the teachings of his Native American mentor, and the behavior the bigfoot displayed in the footage itself. Have a listen and see if you agree with his thoughts. 


39 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Ohhhhhhhhh......Myyyyyyyy......Joergggggg!!!!!

      Joe, lets revisit the trombone comments, and lust over them in all there glory. It will be amazing!

      !FFS!

      Delete
    2. Hey Dressmaker. I thought you preferred being tied down and dominated by Alaskan Bush Pilot? Did you break up with ABP?

      Delete
    3. FFS! Please as if bro...you wish FFS!

      Delete
  2. Look at that diaper butt, lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Page 15;
      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      ... Three years of denial on your part, doesn't make for a good look.

      Delete
    2. Believing in a mythical creature isn't a good look on your part, but you must be confusing me with someone else on the "three years" thing.

      Delete
    3. "Mythical creatures" don't leave tracks pal... Another area you're in denial about, and it's most certainly you after three years.

      Delete
    4. also mythical creatures are witnessed by credible people like police officers and doctors. if that was the case a lot of credible people reporting leprechauns and unicorns but it doesn't happen. There are just way too many sightings where people who know the difference between bears and a creature that is bipedal . While it is true some sightings may be mistaken as bigfoot while they are bear or tree stumps all it takes is one real sighting for bigfoot to be real.

      Joe

      Delete
    5. Ohhhhhhh...........Myyyyyyyy.......Joerggggggg!!!

      Joe, lets make up little native American girl accounts and then meet inside your moms wigwam. You can be my papoos. It will be amazing!

      FFS!

      Delete
    6. OHHHHH.....MYYYYYYY....TROLLL.....LOSER

      some lithium may help your case mate

      Joe

      Delete
  3. That's really good and i think he's right,it certainly makes sense and the woman who did the tarrot cards said there was more than one xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ac collins ladies and gents ^....sorry

      Delete
    2. Poor little butthurt, crying troll. Go ahead, have another tantrum. I'll fetch your binky for you.

      Delete
  4. The real number of Bigfoot in the Patterson Film is zero. Unless you count a guy in a suit. Then it's one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol now you know that's not true :) xx

      Delete
    2. no but you do with the ass cut out ......cause your so friendly , big hit at the furry convention

      Delete
  5. Most sane explanation that I have ever heard for her slowness. Explains looking back over her shoulder also.

    ReplyDelete
  6. makes sense she was leading them away from the juveniles . Why else would she be walking that way looking back at them other than to lead them into a possible trap. Most animals are dangerous when they feel their young are in danger

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, God....thanks for the laugh buddy, its appreciated.

      Delete
    2. how did you manage to escape your padded room ?

      Joe

      Delete
    3. Ha! There you go again!! I really do appreciate the humor you bring around here. Lord knows we all need a good laugh.

      Delete
    4. The laugh's on you kid. Two thirds of your time devoted to this topic and you still can't shake that burden.

      Delete
    5. Ohhhhhh Myyyyyyyyy Qumliiiiiiiii

      Delete
  7. If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. listen to hemispheres "78 live from cobo hall best live rush on the web

      Delete
  8. Mike I hope all is good with you

    ReplyDelete
  9. The PG film is exceptional in its quality and authenticity. No one has been able to remotely come close to replicating the "suit" therefore, through a process of elimination a logical thinking person must reasonably assume that it is not a suit. With so many nay-saying, narrow minded people out there just drooling for proof that the PG creature is simply a suit, clearly it would/could have been replicated considering all of the modern materials we have today that were not even available when this film was shot.

    As far as the male and juvenile theory is concerned; Who knows? If there were three different sets of tracks and the video possibly shows more than one (three to be specific) then it could theoretically be possible.

    ReplyDelete