Here's The Full Video of The Knuckle Walker Incident


Special thanks to biologist John Morley and Mike Brookreson for providing BFE with these videos. Mike definitely has something wandering around his property and we can't wait to see more. If you haven't seen the videos, here's a full compilation of the knuckle walker prints video:




Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Fantastic Mike, please keep us updated as things progress at your place!!

      ~ Chick

      Delete
    2. It had a 1:4:6 ratio. Claerr found it matched Fahrenbach's ratio. He also found the dermals matched Sasquatch. I have been researching with MKB. I can tell you this. He doesn't let 20% of what goes on there be published. So much went down Claerr is writing a new book. There were no less than 5 well known researchers out there in the last week. You'll here more when the dude goes on Sasquatch Chronicles next month. If I were pro kill, I'd pay MKB real cash to get a specimen at that ranch. It's a unique spot. There really is no place like it. I know. I was there.

      Delete
    3. I can also tell you this. They poured more tracks than that knuckle walker. And the larger ones, 13.5 inches and 16 inch tracks had what Claerr called an "os perineum" bone which they felt made it a sure bet. Also Claerr was playing guitar his last night there and had pieces of hardened clay chucked at him. From the middle of the pitch black woods. Everyone cracked up except Brookreson. He just laughed an started singing. He's so unfazed by what had the rest of us shaking our heads, that he must have been at this a very long time.

      Delete
    4. I smell something fishy. If anything happens to Mikey it's on here ASAP. Sasquatch Chronicles is the home of phooey but hey who cares huh? This game is all about trying to as much of a name for yourself as possible. Does Joe still tell Mike what he's allowed to publish or has some kind of sanity broken out here?

      Delete
    5. Hmmmm. All very interesting. Someone up top has part of the story correct.

      Delete
    6. Apparently my open ranch gate policy is getting the better of me. Are you the same person who coincidentally knew all about me and the Falcon Project. I thought your nom de plum was "Mike". Hmmmm.... Interesting.

      Delete
    7. Dear 3:50 and thereafter. There were 4 researchers with me: Rick Tullos, David Claerr, John Morley and myself. Randy Harrington will be down shortly. As for the other tracks, we didn't pour them. As for Sasquatch Chronicles, that was Randy that was on talking about Falcon Project. As for the "os perineum " bone, you referenced earlier, that's something I haven't told anyone so I know you at least know someone or read their email. Huh, I'll keep that in mind next time I hit send.

      Delete
    8. Hey..it`s the "knuckle shuffler" Iktomi up top !!

      Delete
  2. If this vid doesn't feature a plethora of blue bags in it I'm simply not interested.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Replies
    1. No one in the world would invite multiple researchers down for a hoax. Nor would the EVER pay their own travel expenses or risk their reputations to be involved with one, these are real researchers, not anonymous dip$hit trolls like you.

      Delete
  4. A Knuckle print? From a Bigfoot, you say? My, or my, what a discovery! What a Revelation! Well, this Mike B. guy, has done something no other Bigfoot Researcher, ops, sorry, There are no Bigfoot Researchers, yet. He is claiming a mark in the sand is definitely from a Bigfoot! It's always from a Bigfoot. Everything, any Bigfoot "Looker' finds (I.E. A broken branch, etc) is from a Bigfoot!
    My God! Where's Dr Meldrum on this? Where's the Media? Where's Biscardi?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A knuckle print is not unprecedented... Mr.Paul Freeman found one. And saw the creature several times. And found dozens of prints. With dermal ridges. A buttocks print. Hair samples. Filmed bigfoot twice. Only saw them when he was alone. He was no hoaxer, he just wasn't able to provide an actual specimen. No body, just circumstantial evidence. So no bigfoot to show for it. So no way to compare his evidence to an actual creature. No way to confirm the value of any of it.

      Delete
    2. I have a hair sample that has been preliminarily vetted as primate or human, with strands of " broken or interrupted medulla consistent with prior purported Sasquatch samples ". I've agreed to send it to Rhettman Mullis for testing by (Sykes I presume).

      Delete
  5. I received an email yesterday from the good Mr. Brookreson. Heading was yup friggin Sasquatch. The casting was a huge success. I will leave the details for Mr. Brookreson.
    Big Kudos to Mike Brookreson.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Chuck. I always try to keep you and Joe and Rummie in the loop. Always will. Shawn too. And MK and Karl Sup and Buddy B and Lupe and Kelly Shaw and Brandon Garrett. I like to keep collaborating. Although it appears someone up top has gotten some inside info of sorts.

      Delete
  6. Hi guys

    About dermal ridges

    http://youtu.be/TQTOCoMNrag

    Jimmy Cilcutt has lots of info on dermal ridges and how the casting process can accidentally create what appear to be ridges. Very interesting. Many pages on the inter web

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chulcutt is very adamant about the prints that he has verified, and though they are from different locations, they still have the same texture and ridge flow pattern, like a humans however twice the size. Chilcutt stated as plain as day that even Crowley (who's far more enthusiastic than what psuedosceptics would prefer) has stated that even he feels that Walla Walla casts are genuine (25mins in the link below). "He's made me think of being more careful", is all that Chilcutt states, I'm not sure of any source where Chilcutt states that the casting process can accidentally accurately make what are considered convincing biological dermals. On the 36mins, Chilcutt explains that the faked dermals that Crowley sent him was covered in artificial ridge artefacts from the pouring process. The three casts in question that Chilcutt examined, they didn't have this... This is because when you are walking barefoot on the forest floor, the foot comes in contact with both fallen leaves and the soil in making an impression. Therefore, these artefacts would be present in consistency right across the different soil areas of the foot fall and they're not. The delta ridges on prints change directions over 45 degrees; they converge and deviate. This is a major indicator that the dermals are biological and as Chulcutt states, these do not appear on any of the artefacts.

      http://www.skeptic.com/podcasts/monstertalk/10/02/03/

      Hope you are well MMC.

      Delete
    2. Everything is well Iktomi. Thank you

      MMC

      Delete
    3. Check out that radio show link when you can brother... It's a good listen.

      Delete
    4. Nice input MMC and IKTOMI. In a video dealing with this Mike and Morley took pictures of the track(s). They said at the time you could see dermals in the track and hoped it would show up in the casting. The good news is the dermals did show up in the casting that David Claerr did and also another artifact that is unique to Sasquatch tracks. Anyway I will let Mike explain this when ever he weighs in. I would not want to steal his show.
      Chuck

      Delete
    5. http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/experiments_cast_doubt_on_bigfoot_evidence/

      Article that talks about how the casting process can cause anomalies

      MMC

      Delete
    6. The link doesn't work, but I'm familiar with it. It doesn't account for all the things noticed in my comment, nor the fact that dermals are sometimes found in the actual impressions.

      Delete
    7. Just wanted to add that there is extensive documentation on Matt Crowley's casting experiments on his website. Interesting stuff, Meldrum applauded his efforts.

      Delete
    8. Certainly there are iktomi. These ridges will play a big part in the recognition of this species

      There needs to be a central clearing house so one can compair tracks. Weed out hoaxers

      MMC

      Delete
    9. Good stuff. And they well. As will this repeated surfacing and new recognition of the "os perineum" bone by Claerr and his colleagues. Good Stuff by all

      Delete
  7. There are no sasquatches in Central Texas. Anyone that says there are is a liar, and hoaxer. There is not enough cover for them to remain hidden in Central Texas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are Sasquatch reports in Utah, Arizona and Colorado... I don't know how they do it, but if there's reliable sign, they're there.

      Delete
    2. Common misconception, 7:25. They're in central OK, too.

      Delete
    3. ...Im not a fan of the ubiquitous bigfoots theory, either..Seems many of the places do not have much cover, are close to population centers etc..Things like that would make proof inevitable...Can I get to Central Texas from the PNW through contiguous forest? ..If bigfoot has to hitchhike he is busted..lol..

      Delete
    4. My feeling is that geographic distribution of bigfoot is a direct result of media awareness of the subject. You'll notice as time moves forward from the debut of the Patterson Film, and shows and documentaries begin to appear, the frequency and range of encounters increases exponentially. If the species exists, common sense dictates focusing research efforts on the Pacific North West , specifically areas with a high yield of tracks and witness reports. Not at all convinced, but would be the first to throw a keg party if they find a type specimen...

      Delete
    5. ...^Good post...If they exist, they are definitely in PNW if anywhere. Why not focus efforts there...

      Delete
    6. I don't know, perhaps because they are in Texas as well. And Oklahoma. And Arkansas. And Missouri.

      Delete
    7. ..Perhaps, but not definitively..For sure there are no quality photos which would go a long way in generating interest from mainstream scientists...

      Delete
    8. You've got a good chance of getting one here. If Tullos hadn't stowed away his thermal equipment before he left he'd have a face full frontal photo at 40 yards. Read his sighting at "Campfire Tales". Or Claerr's book about the ranch "Sasquatch Tool Use". Or Morley's upcoming book, "Sasquatch, a Contemporary Human". Or better yet, come spend and week here by yourself at the guest house and see for yourself. Gotta go. Thank you all for the comments.

      Delete
    9. ...Thank you for the responses....

      Delete
  8. http://www.bfro.net/GDB/state_listing.asp?state=tx


    Look at the map of Texas here and how little representation Central Texas has for BF sightings. Sahn conjured this character and the whole thing is a hoax, or creation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Sorry Mr paranoid... I know Mike personally, along with his associates and he's a very real person who works extremely hard. Mike has the affiliation of some of the very best researchers in the U.S.

      Check out his YouTube channel; Texas Hillcountry Cryptozoological Society, you can see much more evidence there.

      Delete
    3. I can ditto what Iktomi has said and both of us have been in continuous email with him and are privy to many many emails, videos, and correspondence back and forth for darn near two years. He has had some great researchers come to his property over this time and we have read some of that correspondence and it is it overwhelming.

      Do not fall into the trap of what the bfro shows for a region. Initially I was skeptical after finding very little for this central Texas area but kept an open mind. You see in my area of Ohio ( Mercer, Darke, Preble and the ones to the east including Miami and Montgomery included ) it was thought there are no bigfoots here due to the agricultural nature and no forest. However there are many thousands of acres of trees spread out here and there, some that are several hundred acres. In addition there are 3 large rivers and many big creeks and deep agricultural drain ditches up to 15 feet deep and up to 50 feet wide. I have tracked no less than 10 sightings and encounters since 2009 in this area I am probably only scratching the surface. The bfro did not want to investigate until the calls kept coming in and they could no longer dismiss them. On the bfro blue forum others throughout the midwest are reporting the same phenomena.

      8 39 says they are in central OK, I have no reason to not believe this person. I personally think the forest giant population is growing fast and they have no problem seeking new territory as long as their is water, farms to raid and just enough cover to remain hidden during the day and forage for food under the cover of darkness at night. In my area and many similar throughout the NA continent the living is much easier than just staying deep in the forests.

      Chuck

      Delete
    4. Hello Chuck,do you know why the bigfoot population might be increasing? xx

      Delete
    5. His a theory EVA R. We had this discussion on bfro a few months ago. Just maybe the white man with his diseases that decimated Indian populations got into the bigfoot population also and did a number on them. They may now be much more imune to them now as are the Natives and there populations have recovered. Also with proliferation of outlying agricultural communities getting food is much easier. Getting in closer to humans has become more acceptable to them over the decades. look what the bears and mt. lions, and wolves are accomplishing. Of course this is unprovable with bigfoots, and only a theory.
      Chuck

      Delete
    6. Thanks Chuck that's interesting,i wouldn't have thought about bigfoot having to develop immunity to disease xx

      Delete
    7. There are reports from San Anton Texas, even excluding dumb ass Rick. I had an encounter in North Texas, Lake Texoma. So I see know rreason why they wouldn't cover the ground in-between. Every time you have a creek in Texas, lots of cover. And Texas is loaded with them. So Yah Mikes got activity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
  9. I simply don't understand why (if the prints are so fresh) and they seem to be regularly in that area, that they don't try to use dogs to track and follow the scent. Doesn't appear to be an over-abundance of cover that they could allude for very long. I would think this area would be much easier than the Pacific Northwest to narrow down the pathways and converge in on them. One can make as many casts as you want but it will not contribute any more than what has already been done before. If they get use to eating the fruit Mike lays out for them than it should be possible to get some trailcam pictures of them out in the open. I'm skeptical at this stage but will try to keep an open mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rare dog that will track a bigfoot. 99 percent of time they want nothing to do with them. We had this discussion a few months ago with I think TC or someone from Tennessee. Swore his dogs would hunt a bigfoot and not scared of anything. Then he got in contact with and expert hunting dog trainer in the PNW that stated to him you can not get a dog to track a bigfoot. Even if it did what would happen. Bigfoot would kill the dog with one swat and move out.
      Chuck

      Delete
    2. well send out a pack of dogs eg. bear dogs...put go pro's on them and see the mighty swat of doom from bigfoot..that would be your money shot no?..

      Delete
    3. Go pro on a dog (s) that is not afraid.
      That is pretty darn creative and would stand a chance of being successful.
      Chuck

      Delete
    4. Go Pro on a tracking dog - I LIKE IT!!!

      Delete
    5. As I said above...In a pack the dogs are more likely to pick up the trail....bear hunters use the go pro method up here quite often. And I'm sure they have crossed the scent in this area

      Delete
  10. There are no bigfoots in the Hill Country of Central Texas. You have all been hoaxed or duped or are just gullible. I know there are bigfoots in Texas, I live in Texas myself, and lived 8 years in the hill country. There are bigfoots in the NorthEast, East, and Southeast parts of the state, where there is ample cover and water resources.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I live here in the hill country now, been here for 10 years. In my opinion, there are some. If you don't live near a creek, your not going to have any- I think they travel along them. Something(s) rotates through here every few months for 1-3 nights. So far I have had wood knocks, rooster mimicking, and some assorted other things that I don't feel like saying at this point. By no means proof, but enough for me.

      ~ Chick

      Delete
    2. Chick. They are here. According to you, me, and about 15, by now, researchers that have joined me here since 2012. Thanks for being you! :)

      Delete
  11. You guys may have fun messing with the rest of the gang here, but I'm not stupid and I'm from the Hill Country. You are full of s h i t.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you could just as well close the gaps in the word and use it to sign off with. It'll give you more credibility than your anonymous nonsense. J A C K A S S. :). Hey if you do live here id like to introduce your rectal cavity to my size 12 Tony Llama crocodile boots sometime. That'll make you a footprint expert for sure. :)

      Delete
    2. Mike it takes a big man to threaten another over an internet forum. I'd be willing to look at what you have as "so called" evidence. How about naming the 12 researchers you have involved so that could be verified? You are heavy on production and light on evidence. You seem like a trust fund baby that inherited Daddy's ranch, and are looking for way to pass your drunken days without much to do. I live near Leander and would gladly come look at what you have in person. Then maybe we can see who does what with those Tony Llamas. Got balls?

      Delete
    3. Mike it takes a big man to threaten another over an internet forum. I'd be willing to look at what you have as "so called" evidence. How about naming the 12 researchers you have involved so that could be verified? You are heavy on production and light on evidence. You seem like a trust fund baby that inherited Daddy's ranch, and are looking for way to pass your drunken days without much to do. I live near Leander and would gladly come look at what you have in person. Then maybe we can see who does what with those Tony Llamas. Got a sack?

      Delete
  12. Show us a clear photo(s) of this elusive species that you residents of Texas have said they have been around there in your area for years now,just "one' please.........

    ReplyDelete
  13. The most interesting comments, this casual reader has seen on BE since .......a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I WILL REPEAT THERE ARE NO BIGFOOTS IN THE HILL COUNTRY OF CENTRAL TEXAS. ANYONE WHO SAYS THERE ARE IS A LIAR OR A HOAXER. MOVE ALONG IF YOU HAVE A SERIOUS INTEREST IN BF RESEARCH.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story