Woman Finds Large Tracks Near Home, Captures Strange Image On Video
We're not sure what to make of this. Some large tracks were found near a home, so they decided to set up a camera to see if they could catch something on video. They ended up catching something alright, I just can't explain it.
Hot turd potato
ReplyDeleteWHAT THE!!
ReplyDeleteThe "WHAT THE!!" and "hot turd" are repeated infantile postings, and maybe it should be overlooked as most do since there might be some mental retardation involved, but that's how you are viewed.
DeleteRegarding the footprint, bigfoot usually doesn't have such a pronounced arch; they are usually archless, and she said it was 18" long but only 4" wide. That's awfully narrow for that long of a BF footprint.
I realize they are heavier and make deeper impressions, but the tennis shoe prints around it didn't penetrate the surface at all. Could this depression have been caused by who knows what in the dirt. There are lots of torn up ground in that dirt. Or could a bare foot adult slid his narrow, heavy arched foot forward in the dirt.
Regarding the creature captured on the camera, I did quick clicks at the 3:22 mark, hitting the play/pause button until I could stop it on the subject, and it looks like a dog. It has no height, being perhaps 2 feet tall. What looks like two legs, I believe, is four legs with each pair close together. You can see a head that looks like it could be a dog. It casts a small shadow underneath.
All and all only the footprint is interesting albeit suspect, and I would never forward this video as representing a BF.
WHAT THE!!
DeleteWHAT THE!!
DeleteWHAT THE!!
DeleteNo, Not Maybe, Absolute retard.
DeleteWHAT THE!!!
DeleteYep, not maybe, but a definite retard.
DeleteIt's a damn Gnome!! For Christ sake!!
ReplyDeleteWhy isn't it spelled nome?
DeleteOr why isn't it spelled gbigfoot?
Well..let`s face it..it IS pretty obvious that the big-boy does exist..there`s lots of fun to be had by the denyers and all the debunking that goes on..and the baiting (and smoking,of course,let us be frank) of the moron/imbecile Joe..BUT,at the final totting up,it is clear that there is a reality to this phenomenon that cannot be denied..t`is real.
ReplyDelete^ True Dat
DeleteLOL. Now Joe is back as Mr. Magoo.
DeleteOh MaJoe, you've done it again.
DeleteWell then show us the bigfoot.
DeleteYears and years of evidence but not one body. 50 years since the PG film yet no other remotely clear videos or pictures.
All of this yet nothing but footers trying to make stories into reality.
As I remember Mr.Magoo was extremely nearsighted which come to think of it would explain a lot of sightings.
DeleteHey 9:03 skeptard, let's face it. It IS pretty obvious that the big boy does exist.
DeleteMr. Magoo was nearsighted, but he was also extremely stupid. That would explain a lot of sightings.
Delete^ True Dat
DeleteHey 9:10, then show me more than blurry photos and videos.
DeleteStories from indian tribes for hundreds of years would lead you to believe that a bigfoot population would be well into the 10's of thousands in order to survive to this point in time yet, no body.
Plenty of footprints and people claiming to habitate them but no clear pictures.
Plenty of stories but no proof.
^ True Dat
DeleteConfirms on all points. Mid-tarsal break, sagittal crest, dermal ridges, etc. It's all there.
ReplyDeleteNotice the arm length. It's definitely too long to be a human.
DeleteThis is the same Native American woman who films a "ghost wolf" in that location. Pass on this one.
ReplyDeletePass.
DeleteIt's a detachable penis FFS!
ReplyDeleteAll from the same Joe obsessed Anon, talk about loser.
ReplyDeleteall the indians I know are either at the bar getting drunk or gambling at the bar down the street...i want a dead booger..somebody please shoot one or drive over one with your semi
ReplyDelete