Check Out This Book Review of "Sasquatch Tool Use"
Daniel Dover writes: "Here is a book review on "Sasquatch Tool Use" by David Claerr. He found evidence of sasquatches chipping away flint to make cutting tools and stone hand axes. Bones that were split open to reach the marrow showed impact points matching the edge of a crafted "hand axe." Other squatch made tools were also discovered. The book also speculates on sasquatch being a species of man, citing DNA findings."
Link: Book Review of “Sasquatch Tool Use”
First
ReplyDeleteBeauty ey
DeleteI got here very, very late... But I would like to congratulate both Mike Brookreson and D. Dover for their roles respectively. I think nobody works harder than Mike and I believe Dover to be one of the most educated voices in the subject at present.
DeleteHaven't sought personal help yet eh Joe. Sad to watch your downward spiral continue.
DeleteI'm sorry... I keep hearing reference to this Joe chap, I see nothing but spiralling health from anonymous posters name dropping him though.
DeleteThe only Sasquatch Tool that I know of is Joe F itz.
ReplyDeleteBack under another name? Shame. The guy kills this board stone dead. Time he moved on and discussed the subject with adults.
DeleteIt's time a lot of people moved on and dropped this odd infatuation.
DeleteBigfoot used to get his tools from Snap-On, but now his first choice is Matco. Snap-On stopped accepting handfuls of poo as legal tender.
DeleteYou're not funny.
DeleteJust go away.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSasquatch tools are huge.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"The Resaercher had locked himself in the wine cellar, were we hearing woodknocks or him beating on the door,? 'we don't have a corking screw, I could clearly make out ...'" The excerpt did not make the ebook. ;$
ReplyDeleteHaha!
DeleteI know Caerr was on your property and it must have been an oversight to skip that incident. What part of the e-book, if any, was on your property?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteWhat part. Hmmm. Hard to say. Most of it. Maybe almost all of it. Dave knows where to go. I think he's quite comfortable researching there.
DeleteI laughed. I cried. I peed my pants. Comedy genius.
DeleteYou're off my Christmas list 8:50...
DeleteIt was funny for awhile but you've spoiled it by overuse.
Get a new plan Stan...
+1
DeleteA ranch in central Texas. Anyone we know?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the review Dan. I have followed Claerr in his articles he has written for Yahoo for several years. This is one I will buy.
Hey Charlie, I need to borrow your Kindle
Chuck
Breaking open bones to reach the marrow has been observed many times with deer kills. They seem to favor the liver, the hind quarters, and the marrow inside of bones.
DeleteIf this is true, that some flake off stone to make a tool to assist in extracting bone marrow that places their intelligence with primitive man.
Many nutrients in bone marrow as with livers. Sometimes they just want the vitamins and nothing more.
DeleteIt is interesting in Albert Ostman's account of his six days with a family. He said he had never seen them eat any meat, however a lot of sweet roots which they offered him and he ate them also. Mike had emailed a couple months back about evidence David had found on his ranch of tool making. I would suspect they witnessed Native Americans over the past centuries doing this first.
Chuck
I'm interested on what was found on Mike's property in Texas.
DeleteI agree that is where such activity was likely first learned and then passed down among their kind. Some learned behaviors are likely regional though, as are resources for making such tools, and it's probably more prevalent among certain groups.
I read of evidence of them using a broken bottle to cut hair off. Glass would be the next likely progression if any of them had previously used the glass like obsidian stone to cut with.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYes indeed, do tell us Mike what was found on your property in Texas. We are all ears!
DeleteAre you ? All ears. This isn't my story to tell or augment. D Dover at 3:22. You wanna see something really scary? They are smarter than you. More capable. You have to steal back unpredictability and fear. You seem like a better brain. You wanna meet the man? I could maybe hook you up. We could maybe take a walk. You are on the right path. But once you go down it you can never go back and nobody. And I mean no body. Ever sees it or for that matter me coming. Not in the dark they don't. At first no lights. At first no cameras. Just control the fear. And it'll be alright Maybe.
DeleteMostly to understand what I see you have to see it. You have to hear it. And then you will F E E L it. Then you can. write about it. I don't even touch on 95% of it. There's simply no need.
DeleteDover you can contact me by pm on FB. If you want to see one. If you want to try and follow one. I'll take you out. Just you. Nobody else.
DeleteI would love to. They only problem is I'm half a country away in Northern California. I have seen it, smelled it, heard it, and I was even injured by one. I've witnessed their intelligence and great athletic ability. But I'm sure your location can build on that. I'll pm you about it.
DeleteWhoa - that sounds like some scary stuff Mike! I hope you don't mind me being informal and calling you by your first name, I just feel like we are friends now. No more comedy jokes - let's move on to building a closer relationship. I'm a bigfoot novice - perhaps you can enlighten me and turn me away from the dark side of skepticism. It sounds to me like you may have a special relationship with them . . . the bigfoot I mean. So are they flesh and blood? Paranormal? Are there lots of them? Spill the beans Mike - I'm all ears. I'm betting you have some great stuff to share! Thanks hombre!
Delete:). I'm paranormal. They are quite flesh and blood, after all, the paranormal don't require tools do they? At least from my experience, I discount no others that see "other things". You know what. I think I'm quite done with the jokes too. Look. Between you and I ...ummm, it is. Scary I mean. As scary as the thought of exchanging personal pertinent information on a Bigfoot Blog in the Comments Section. Sadly despite MMGs cryptic warnings I have pledged to go into the field for six months with the FP. Despite my fun time here I do take the Subject matter quite seriously. Dover had a much deeper history than even I was aware, for example. If I had time to cultivate relationships that started here, for example, I would begin by limiting my true involvement in such an exchange until the fall. When I could give it my undivided attention. Suffice to say I'm willing to take the willing. Oh and I don't mind researching with others either. You let me know if you've "changed skins" or merely "changed pens".
DeleteI'll tell you what. You buy this ebook. Or download it for free on Kindle Unlimited I care not. It provides an adequate introduction to a property that does indeed have Sasquatch on it. And if you still feel that way and you're willing to wait until fall. Well I've invited Dover down to visit. Oh there's one more coming. Besides you of course. I invited him last year. You know him. Why, of course you do. Mr Joe from Wales. He's been waiting along time and saving euros for just this occasion.
DeleteSo your a flesh and blood man - good, we have a starting point. My take is that if it breaths, walks, eats and defecates it can be caught. Now despite my skepticism (does it show?) I'm interested in the subject. I'm also interested in which side of the court you are on so to speak. Are you protective of them and are satisfied with your knowledge they exist or are you ready to prove to the world they are real? Honestly, wouldn't you love to shut up us skeptics? I mean one body and BOOM we are done, eating crow and begging forgiveness (well, some of us anyway). It sounds like you may have them on your property in Texas - yes? You do realize that anyone who brings in a bigfoot is going to be very, very, very rich if he plays his cards right. I may be talking to a future millionaire who knows?
DeleteSorry for so many question - remember I'm a bigfoot novice. I'm trying to cram. Thanks hombre - buddies for life!
:). Let's assume I'm all for proving the species. Let's assume money is always an issue, it's not the issue. I'm much more skeptical than you might imagine. I don't have a problem with skeptics. Eric Collier was a skeptic. So was my nephew. If you spend a liitle time with me that too shall pass. That leaves what though? I've been down this hole of discussion before. I wouldn't be going out with FP if I wasn't serious enough about proving them.
DeleteYes, I will buy that book. If it is good I will praise it here and if it stinks I will scorch it. How kind of you to invite me down. Can I bring my armament - you know heavy artillery and such? Of course we would have to be careful and not blow up any illegals passing through. I'm a pretty good shot with bombardment and I don't think they can run that fast!
DeleteWe are going to be rich buddy!
Yes you would. Your no different than rest of them. A little fame. A little face time on the tube. Maybe be a go to guy for the Huffington Post when future fuzzy videos roll down the pike. You're a Fasano with different tactics.
DeleteI would do it for SCIENCE sir . . .
Deleteand of course the fame and money.
Ahhhhh. A killer eh? Well. I could've guessed. I don't judge. But, you don't want to do that here. Let's presuppose that a relict species needs protected parcels to survive. And let's further assume that I'm very close to high fence ranchers with armed 24 hour security patrols. They are quite used to me and the ococainsional bad girl I rescue from the dangers of the winery. But they grow quite leery of strangers and especially ones bearing arms. Look. I'm all for a catchy way to catch their DNA. But I couldn't shoot one in the head. Sadly, I'm not yet certain I can say the same about all of our modern cousins. Besides. Anyone truly serious about this would have asked me privately and some have. You take care. M
Delete^I say bull crap to you buddy^ I have been to your facebook page and nothing but blurry, out of focus and darken images of supposedly Bigfoot photos and videos. You might have others fooled,but not me buddy. No need to reply as I will not waste any more of my time with your utter nonsense.
DeleteAhhh- I'm just having a little fun Mike. I'm a lover not a killer. Besides a live bigfoot would bring in a much higher bounty. Since I do not believe in bigfoot any humanoid figure that I would set my sights on would have to be a human (modern day) and spending what's left of my life in a penitentiary for murder is not what I want for my golden years. Frankly I surprised some damn fool hasn't pulled the trigger on some unsuspecting hiker thinking it WAS a bigfoot. I'm fascinated by you believers and that is why I come here (and for of course the humor). I am going to buy that book and I will report back once I've read it.
DeleteNow I'm going to get serious for a moment (just a moment) and tell you this. If I DID believe in bigfoot and I DID believe they lived in a certain area and I COULD get fairly close to them as you have insinuated and they WERE flesh and blood - I would stop at nothing - NOTHING to prove it and gain fame and fortune. Surely you realize the gold mine that is at your finger tips if what you say is true?? Hell- why not invite the Falcon Project to come down there. Spotting one in that terrain has to be easier than a dense forest. I will be anxious to see pictures of the terrain once I get that book.
Your a strange cat Mike but I like you. I realize we got off to a bad start but believe it or not I hope you or others prove bigfoot exists and rub my nose in it. I enjoy talking with you and others here but I still on the unbelievers side of the court.
Evening H.G.,
DeleteKnew you'd come back...they always come back.
Take your shoes off and stay awhile...
Understood. A strange cat? Perhaps. Though everything here is not as simple as it seems. Were it so I would just be some blurry pictures posted on Facebook? I can promise you this much. I have never learned one single thing in the realm of social media. Not one. And I wouldn't trust one real shred of evidence there. But I think the record is clear from books written and those yet to press and publish that I have no problem taking people out to the ranch. And you say you'll stop at nothing? Well. I hope you don't. I would love to see someone find them. I'm going to watch Better Call Saul and rest. I have a small rodeo after-party headache. Do take care. M
DeleteClive, please put the dog out before you go to bed, he's got that look in his eye. ;)
DeleteI like that look !
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete9:23... Next time you've got a day time bear at the wood line, go and get us some "conclusive evidence" of the encounter. Now... You might be able to accomplish that considering how experienced I am lead to believe you are (if you are HG). However, this is not true of a significant amount of the population who are not experienced in such a manner. Now... Consider hypothetically that this is indeed the case with you, that you are bot experienced with wild animals and are naturally very cautious, next time you've unexpectedly got something growling at you from tree height in the middle of the night, throwing rocks at you in the middle of the woods, go and fetch us some "conclusive evidence".
DeleteI hope that articulates how idealist someone suggesting someone else goes get the evidence is. To some around here, the existence of this creature is not even a question. Knowing what they can do to a normal human, equally as realistic.
Hi Joe and thanks for your commentary. I'm taking a few minutes away from work to check in. Interesting that you "know" what they can do to a human. So your headed to Texas one of these days - what's YOUR plan to prove they exist. Wouldn't it be great if you could prove to all of us ignorant skeptics they exist? Wouldn't it be sweet satisfaction to have all of us skeptics acknowledge you were right all along? You guys bring in a body - dead or alive and WHAM - we have no argument or ground to stand on. Your a smart guy - what's your plan? This may be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. I have some suggestions but let's hear yours first. Let's talk brother. Well, back to work . . .
DeleteBy the way - who is HG? Seriously - whose initials are those?
^^^Just to chime regarding your comment bringing in a body a live one or dead body, I would think/assume most of us on the fence or totally skeptic believers would settle for a clear photo(s) and or a good quality video of this species(Sasquatch) existence at this point,would you agree...........
DeleteI'm afraid I do not. With advances in video technology even the best video or high quality picture would be questioned. With a body - live or dead, there would be absolutely no questioning it's authenticity. All this talk and bravado of "knowing" where they are and their habits but not even a clear picture. After all this time with hundreds of video/still pictures of dark and shadowy figures the time for pictures has passed. As I stated in the post above - just ONE body and the debate is over.
DeleteTake two Monster Quest and call the doctor in the morning.
DeleteYou need a valium and a laxative badly.
LOL -thus speaks the disciple of the Church of Bigfoot.
Delete10:46... "HG" is in reference to " Hunter Guy"... A really knowledgeable guy who posted around here about two months back. Was hoping he'd post more often but I see similarities in your comments. Though footage is and has been good enough for me, I agree that in this day and age, people naturally "use" angles of the most unrealistic, expensive Hollywood techniques in trying to explain them away. Footage holds no promise for proof; however a necessary cog in the wheel of evidence no less. We also have people coming forward with claims like this;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/watch-interview-with-retired-forest.html
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/watch-this-retired-forest-ranger.html
With regards to a body. I think I put this into context with my comment above. It's not as simple as shooting one and dragging it out of there, though I'm sure people have indeed come close over time. It's also a matter of either wanting to kill one also... This would not be a policy for Mike and I know sure as heck that it wouldn't be mine... This is therefore a grey area with regards to what would constitute proof and how would we go about it. I really wouldn't like to make some rather major claims to be going to get proof either, I think research at any level would suffice and is what is most important here. And how do I know what they can do to a human? Think about it for a moment... Think what a chimpanzee can do to a human, now what something ten times the size could.
What's your ideas?
Okay - first of all I'm not Hunter Guy although I read the posts and what he wrote made sense to me especially about using dogs. I'm also done with the references to Mike Brookreson comedy genius stuff - it ran it's course and I'm now bored with it and told Mike so. As you can read in the posts above I'm probably even beyond claiming to be a skeptic, I now flat out do not believe it exists. So I'm a tough crowd to convince. I think we can both agree on this - what is presented as evidence is not proof of it's existence. It may certainly be evidence in the eyes of some but is not conclusive proof. Let's review:
DeleteWitnesses: Not conclusive. People make mistakes, People lie. Some just like attention.
Video/Pictures: Not conclusive. Video and pictures have and can be faked. Technological advances and savvy hoaxers can manipulate visuals.
Footprints: Disputed. Dermal ridges have been seriously questioned. Footprints can be made and hoaxed.
Hair: Disputed. To my knowledge nothing conclusive and without question has come from what is offered as sasquatch hair.
Scat: Disputed. Same as above.
DNA: Inconclusive and disputed. Everyone had high hopes for Ketchum and Sykes study. In the end everyone was disappointed. Even among some of the most avid supporters.
So you have this evidence and yet we are no further along then we were since the PGF in proving to the world it exists. I hope we can agree we need a body live or dead. Even though I joked above I agree with you guys about not shooting one. Since I do not believe they exist, I am more afraid of a mistaken shooting of a vagrant, hiker, hoaxer or someone just out for a stroll enjoying nature. I am also not for the unnecessary killing of anything. But we do need that body.
Now Mike interests me and I hope he will read this post in that he seems to infer he knows the area where some dwell and is familiar with their habits. You seem to be convinced he is on the level. From what I can surmise this seems to be somewhere in central Texas? I am curious about the terrain down there so I plan to order that book and hopefully there will be some pictures of the area. If you ever do make it to that area and confirm what Mike says without proof than most will simply say it was a case of preaching to the choir. In others words you were disposed to believe in the first place and would not be objective with your findings. So - we all know you need a body for final proof.
What's my idea? I'm glad you asked. You and Mike both agree on it being a flesh and blood creature. Mike infers that he is aware of what it eats, tangerines being one of them. Why not try a sedative mixed into the food and then have trailing dogs and posse pursue. Sure there is a danger of overdose but that is a chance one has to take for proof and would not constitute an outright killing. I understand the logistics however if I was convinced it exists I sure would spare no expense and that it why I cannot understand why Mike is not being more aggressive in pursuing them. We are literally talking a payout of millions of dollars. Hunter guy was correct in his assessment of tracking dogs in my opinion and I for one do not believe they would be deterred by ANYTHING if properly trained. For those who come up with the argument that dogs are scared of bigfoot, or it can sense that food has been doctored or it's too intelligent or any of the myriad of excuses given I have no time for because NO ONE really knows for sure.
It may not be the right solution but if this is a flesh and blood animal it CAN be caught or (regrettably) shot. By the way Mike never did answer my question as to why he doesn't lobby the Falcon Project to come down there. I would think the terrain would be more conducive to spotting it and Mike says they are certainly in the area so it would be a good place to start.
Oh oh - lunch has slipped away and time to get back to work. Hope that has given you something to think about. Regards.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/this-bigfoot-story-about-injured.html?m=0
DeleteI have evidence of Sasquatches creating celestial observatories, conducting brain surgery, and building giant stone pyramids. All that is missing is the evidence of Sasquatches themselves.
ReplyDeleteWell, this book review shows where the tools came from it used for surgery and building pyramids.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteMy baloney has a first name,
ReplyDeleteit's Iktomi;
My baloney has a second name,
it's Dover.
I love to read it everyday
And if you ask me what I'll saaaaaaay
Cuz Iktomi Dover has a way with B-u-l-l-c-r-a-p.
On top of the fact that you are perverse and obsessed- that little ditty probably took you all day to put together. Very sad.
DeleteI made a light hearted response on where they got their tools for your fictional evidence, no need for this immature poetry.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteWhen you can provide enough evidence of the existence of Bigfoot to satisfy the majority of the scientific community that they do, in fact exist, your claims regarding their behaviors may be of some interest. But claiming to have evidence of tool use by a creature you can't even proves exists is nothing more than delusions stacked on top of fantasy. You are building a second story on to a house that doesn't have any walls or foundation.
DeleteOhhhhh but what a lovely house it is. Some sit on the water. Some sit in the clouds. (Lando Calrissian ). I knew a man who lived above a ten story bank, his assets over tne million dollars. ;). Haints my skeptical foil, don't get so caught up in the architecture that you miss the aesthetic.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete"Haints"... How about you man up, grow a braincell and show us that the scientific evidence doesn't stand up? Forgive me, I forget that it's your intellectual level to dismiss something rhetorically and demand more... We know this from how you last only a two comments at the most when it gets too advanced for you. You see, by your very failures to show that the evidence is none existent (not yours directly, but those of your theory group who I'm sure you would love to aspire to), this is a means to invest enthusiasm on the authenticity of such a creature. You see... We have schools of archaeology to draw from in applying to theories regarding tools found in and around areas known the exhibit activity.
DeleteSo... Though you would love to rhetorically demand we show proof before anything of the sort is discussed, it quite frankly is none of your business being so uneducated and stupid, and it is no more than a convenient bypass from discussing very real physical evidence that we already know you struggle to content with. You are no more intelligent than the average troll who craves cyber attention, to grasp that in an environment where people are not as equally in denial of the matter, that we can draw on recognised past hominid customs in relating to this immediate topic.
Hope that cleared it up for you a little.
An authoritative book based on absolutely nothing at all but conjecture about an animal never proven to exist.
ReplyDeleteWow, let's waste money on that!
From someone who hasn't read the book and writes a critique based on their preconceived bias.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThe bigfoot scam making more money in more ways every day.
ReplyDeleteNow that's progress!
The scam is you being duped by your parents before bed time that for purposes of reassurance.
DeleteHi Joe F, if I may give you some advise if ya don't mind regarding your visit to this Mike B's invitation..........
DeleteOf course!
DeleteHoax & Rip off...........
ReplyDelete