Mark Anders' Bigfoot Looks Like Patty
We're not sure if this is photoshopped or not, but if this is a costume, it's a damn good costume. Here's Mark Anders with a new footage of a female Bigfoot:
BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
That ain't no Patty!!
ReplyDeleteHello Joe
DeleteThat's Pattys daughter Penelope
MMC
Ha ha ha!! Hey bro, good to see you!!
DeleteWheres the footage? You talk shit Shawn
DeleteNope, it aint. Body far too squat.
DeleteAnd it is wearing black boots
Deleteblack jack boots that be BLM troopers
DeleteYes its been well documented that when sasquatch are around orbs have been seen. Ron Morehead and Scott Nelson also talk about the orbs and the very high strangeness in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.
DeleteLook at the feet. They look a lot like hiking boots.
ReplyDeleteRPP
No mid tercel break
DeleteGood eye
Many track lines and prints suggest mid-tarsal break is not a defining feature of a Sasquatch footprint. Many seem to lack the ridge and it has been noted that up to 25% of modern humans have mid-tarsal ridges.
DeleteAs for this creature resembling Patty, yes, it very much does.
I know BF exists but Patty is not a real BF, it's a suit. If you were to take this costume from Anders and use an old Xmm camera it would be very very close to Patty.
The hoaxers are paying more attention to detail these day! Trying their best to make an exact replica of Patty because they know she is the gold standard as far as Real Bigfoot footage!
ReplyDeleteI had my sighting in NorCal 9 years ago this past fall. The creature that I witnessed looked nothing like Patty. Which is odd considering my sighting was no more than 90 miles from the film site.
DeleteWay too much funny business surrounding not only the film and those involved with it but preceding events.
Great story! Congrats on your sighting! Your very fortunate. No doubt there are different looking Squatch. I just think Patty is 100% real. I don't see anything in her that looks like a dude in a suit! But This debate has been beaten to death so let's just agree to disagree! Enjoy your day.
DeleteI don't think you quite understand. When I say it looked nothing like Patty, I mean that outside of being covered in hair, it had little to no resemblance of Patty at all. This was less than 100 miles from where Patty was filmed.
DeleteThere is absolutely disparaging details in animals, but you can always tell that a human is a human. A Gorilla always looks like a gorilla, a Rhesus Monkey always looks like a Rhesus Monkey, a chimp always looks like a chimp.
Patty looked nothing like what I saw. When I see that film, it looks like a man walking in a cumbersome and weighted suit on a post-flood sandbar. I've seen and heard every single claim and analyzation of the film, I've listened to what Gimlin and those associated with the film have said, I've witnessed the actions of the family, the community, and those truly obsessed with it...
And it still looks like a man in a damn monkey suit. Couple tht with the fact the film subject looks nothin like what I saw in the same geographical area and it makes it even more obvious of a hoax.
Again, I'm not going to debate this! Only thing I will say is Some of the Squatch vids that are out there that I believe are authentic do not look like Patty! But that doesn't change my opinion that Patty is the real deal! There are a bunch of different Squatch types. These differences include color, shape, head shape, muscle build, etc!
Delete4:36...
DeleteFirstly, I will ask you this... If you can describe exactly what you saw, I will do my very best to help you with your concern. There are more than one type of Sasquatch... Some experienced researchers even refrain from calling the other type Sasquatch, because they have human faces and limbs in proportion. Sasquatch also use quadrupedal motion very frequently, especially juveniles.
When you look at the PGF, you feel it's a human, because that's exactly what it is; a type of human. This is a concept that even very experienced people in this subject struggle with. You also have to remember that nearly every shady aspect of the back story regarding the footage, was perpetuated by someone in Greg Long, who fabricated interviews to sell books.
Now... I am very curious to know about exactly what you saw, if you share that, then we might piece together a reason for the difference between the subject in the PGF and your experience.
Peace.
Also... You only have to look at the matching specimen in Leaping Russian Yeti and Prince Edward Island, to know that something within the range of what Patty looks like can achieve the stealth that is widely reported by eyewitnesses.
DeleteListen, I've been in the field for nearly 20 years now. I've had a Class A sighting in broad daylight, less than 40 yards away. I had this sighting less than 100 miles from where this film was produced.
DeleteWhen I see the PGF, I don't think human, I think human in a modified suit. Bigfoot is not a human, what I saw was not human. Homo Sapien Sapien is a rigid definition, not flexible.
Just because something MAY fall under the Homo genus does not make it human.
My opinion of PGF, it's characters, timelines, whatever have absolutely nothing to do with Greg Long, his book, or his research. It comes from my own and has not changed. My opinion was formed prior to Greg Long's book being released.
Pardon my frankness but where did I exactly ask for your help? I don't recall asking for anything, especially help. Have you ever experienced a Squatch? Have you ever led an expedition into the woods? Have you ever hunted? Do you own your own land? What gives you any experience in this field to even believe that your help is necessary or warranted?
And for future purposes, I find the LRY to be a hoax and PEI to also be incredibly suspect.
A type of human is flexible though. We know that hominids like Neaderthal had culture, and if Sasquatch bury their dead (which is ridiculously plausible considering the anthropological studies that have uncovered giant skeletons), then that would put these subjects into an intelligence bracket roughly as equal to us and therefore my labeling them as a type of human is totally justified... Sir.
DeleteThe PGF 'characters' have been molded to suit an attempt at making money from it. The timeline is not a suspect as people think, and there are clear explanations for the editing of that footage to be achieved... Again, this idea molded to suit an attempt at making money from it. It begs the question... How could you possibly have devised an theory based on the necessity to have key information devised by Long in the first place?
You didn't ask for my help, you are posting on a Bigfoot blog, and forgive me for sounding frank, but I have as much right to be here as you... Regardless of your apparent experience that I very much respect and would like to ascertain on a seemingly more civil manner than what your comments seem to convey. I think you'll find the place I reside extremely unlikely to have any of the amazing attributes your great country enjoys, but that doesn't mean I am not in close affiliation with some of the very best researchers in your country, who have twice the experience as you and three times the accounts.
I think you'll find an old Russian man and his kid hoaxing a subject that jumps feet in the air transitioning into both bipedal and quadrupedal motion with the limb girth, speed and muscle tone all achieved... A greater leap of faith to be a hoax. Whilst if you can find me a the para-Olympian that achieved that speed across that piece of awkward, long grassed terrain, then I might share your suspicious sentiment.
And to your experience that you avoid? Is there an 'experience'? why should anyone listen to someone anonymously who states his done this and that?? You could be anyone????
6:01 I'll back joe on the leaping yeti video, I'd like to see any person or athlete try to replicate that movement ! Anyone who try's to run threw the bush at full speed and never mind jumping at the same time, good luck! Lol ie been a hunter, trapper for 40 years and own hundreds of acres of forested land, seen lots of different animals. I got a simple question for u cause u were saying u been researching the subject for 20 years and had a very close incounter with a sasqwatch. When u were 40 yards away from one in broad daylight which was basically the same thing that happen to me years back, what did u do after u realized what u were looking at?? Did u stand there a observe the subject ? What were your feelings toward what was happening? And what type of sasqwatch did u see? Also what was it doing, it must of been doing something to be there at tht time during the day???? It be nice if u could answer these questions I'd really like to compare them to what happen to me that's sir!! Have a good day TTL also there's enough good info for the everyday smart person to research these animals from home if they can't get in the feild themselves for whatever there reason might be! Ttl
DeleteJoe, I voiced my opinion. I did not ask for anything. You specifically stated "I will do my very best to help you with your concern." Joe, I have no concerns regarding the incident or what I saw. I don't want nor need your assistance with anything.
DeleteHad you made a simple passing comment or question, you would have recieved a completely different response in tone and subject. You didn't, however, you passed off that post in a bad tone and silently inferred questionable thoughts.
Hominids are not human, nor were they roughly as intelligent as us. There is a reason we measure brain size and use it as a litmus for classification. They may have been intelligent in relation but not nearly as intelligent as us.
I said it earlier and I'll say it now; I find PGF to be fake, LRY to be hoaxed, and PEI to be fake. The only footage I've ever seen on the Internet that I think may possibly be real is Freeman but it's even too blurry and short to tell.
There is absolutely nothing you can say to convince me otherwise. I really don't care about it, I don't hang my hat on these clips to be evidence of bigfoot. You may as well save yourself the time and words.
Delete'Helping you with your concern' is a figure of speech.. In this case I used to it converse/'help you' with your concern regarding the PGF, which is undeniably negative compared to what I percieved as accurate; you're on a blog. I think your tone has been evident through this thread to first Squatchin' before me... If you are offended it seems it's not something hard to do.
DeleteClassifications; interesting details, I often wonder what they'll be classified as, but we know the earliest scholars came up with homo trogliditis in complete conjunction with that of homo sapien. You seem to be of the dated and quite frankly boring mindset that these subjects are animals, a theory that I'm not afraid to counter as mere BS. Having the relevant social structures and close bonds in what has helped them be so evasive, as is the requirement to bury their dead; this outlines culture and steers well clear of any dated idea that these are mere animals, because something not half as intelligent as us would have been found by now. You also have the inumerable native belief systems that have maintained for ten thousand years; they were another tribe, sometimes canniblistic. Lastly... You have a hominid study in full swing at the moment, that is investigating the claims of living human hybrids.
All this points to a tyoe of human as close to us that it can interbreed with us, paired with points up top... To me, that's a type of people.
Your opinion is respected, and I like the Freeman footage. Hasn't that got an equally suspect background though?
TL;DR
DeleteYou are also aware of their ability to use very complex, layered language?
DeleteCulture.
No??
DeleteOk... Your post at 9:30 says a lot. My comment is there for when you're mature enough to maintain an adult conversation without throwing your toys about.
20 years?
(Sigh)
The Anon claiming he had a class A sighting is so obviously full of garbage. Won't even describe what he saw. Just another skeptic trying to debunk. Next.
DeleteThere goes PJ's "got magic monkey suit" "comeback"
ReplyDeleteNot really when you're up against clear photoshopping.
Delete; )
Well joe did u enjoy the video? How's things today? Any new interweb findings? Ttl
DeleteHello my friend!
DeleteGot busy late on last night but it's ready to go on my laptop! Looks really professionally made, I can't wait!! How are you buddy???
The guys that my friend took out were younger doing this video for a film festival completion I belive! Myself, well this is going to be one of the biggest days of my life I have a lot going on, I've found out in the past here there are some really bad people out there and I really don't now how they sleep at night doing some of the things they do to people. I'm sticking to the truth and it will prove right in the end of this mess! I still have months ahead of me to get this all sorted out and I can move on with my life it's nice to come on here once in a while and get your mind of things. Have a good day joe! Ttl
DeleteJoe ! Ttl I'm a person who thinks what's right is right and what's wrong is wrong, nothing to hide on my end life is to short but there are some people out there that I just don't understand how they were brought up in life! When I ever get this email sorted will talk, I got some pretty crazy stories, trialled lots, seen some pretty crazy things in my life! Cheers ttl
DeleteTTL!! I hope you're not having too much of a hard time, you're a good man and I'm very much looking forward to those email chats!!
DeleteYou have a friend in me buddy.
Joe that fella above is testy. I didn't know you had to be a gentrified land owner to have an opinion on Bigfoot. Why speaking of Bigfoot Joe I was downloading Fancybooklearnin the other day and there was my kid better brain Michael Merchant. And boy did he let it rip on the community. But I digress. To me the Subject in this video has some very thin ankles. Back in the 80s calling somebody "bird. legs" was quite the insult. Mark Anders is such a guilty pleasure. I've never said once I believe in his videos. But they make me smile.
DeleteTtl I've been thinking of people we can consult to solve your email problem. Alexander Graham Bell, Jennna Jameson, perhaps Dan Campbell. I look forward to getting it worked out. We night not have the best equipment, but we do know how to use it. ;).
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!
DeleteHey mike! TTL! This is a big enough step in computer land for me a the moment. Lol The email will be comin soon though I'm just dreading the typing and spellcheck meltdown the computer is going to have when it recognizes that its worst nightmare is back in email/ interweb land, it's hard enough on here when your spelling is so bad the spellcheck gives u the wrong words, lol ttl in time, look out interweb !!
DeleteHa ha ha ha!!!
Delete"Footage". I just saw a picture. That's not "footage"...did I miss something.
ReplyDeleteAnd these guys narrating are - um...silly (to be nice).
And that's why it's so suspect and obviously photo-shopped.
Delete^^Jeez, yes. I thought Shawn posted this the other day, unless this is another one. They're all the same hoaxing BS. This @sshat needs to be ruthlessly ignored.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYet, these people seem to get the attention they crave.
DeleteFrustrating.
Well, Shawn posts the crap.
DeleteLOL. It's all fake. Patty was a suit, too. Yes, it was!
ReplyDeleteGot monkey suit?
DeleteMore monkey suits exist than bigfoot, regardless of the veracity of witness sightings.
DeleteBut none that can't be replicated from a time when such materials weren't even available.
DeleteNo monkey suits deduct proportion and none present such obvious organic detail as the PGF.
Hey Anonymous 4:36:00 check out this video not to beat a dead horse but here is a link of what someone thinks about if patty is a suit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ORhKm7wD10
ReplyDeleteShes fat, I like er
ReplyDeleteBany got back
DeleteBaby got back
DeleteOooops
silicone squatches are on the rise in Los Angeles.
ReplyDeleteThis looks like a baby attached to the front of the bigfoot. What you said looks like a breast actually looks like a head of a baby bigfoot. I've seen other photos and videos of babies attached to the front and they blend in very well with the mother, I've also seen pictures of them on the back which looks like a bigfoot with a hunch back but it's actually a baby
ReplyDeleteReally? Where are all these pictures?
Deleteshave it and cover it in KY Jelly...
ReplyDeletethat be a Rumtifusel critter
Delete