Friday, March 7, 2014

Bigfoot In Snowy Background?


This is pretty strange and apparently, it's from a "non-Bigfooter". The Squatchers Lounge member Sommer Anne shared this photograph supposedly taken during a photo shoot in the mountains. She writes:

A non-Bigfooty friend of mine sent this to me the other day... Her friend was doing a photo shoot in the mountains near Solitude and captured something interesting in the background. Just thought I would share it with you all and see what you thought. Have a great day!

Zoomed:
Bigfoot, or person?

230 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Taking bets now! Who will make Joe look stupid today? Will it be...

      A) Dmaker
      B) Daniel Campbell
      C) the "fish in a barrel" guy
      D) the anonymous Oregon forest ranger who stops by once a week

      Have all wagers in by 6 AM PST. Good luck to all!

      Delete
    2. I got 5 says he makes himself luck dumb by flipping out over trolls

      Delete
    3. The bloke in a suit guy!

      Delete
    4. A or c, never heard of d. Is he new?

      Delete
    5. ^hes the anon that trys to explain to joe in detail how the forestry department works and joe just bites his head off so he leaves.

      Anon1:29 sorry, I should have included the bloke in a suit guy. Haha!

      Delete
    6. Oh the forestry dude used to have a name but he only posts as anon now.

      Delete
    7. DC is the man!

      This is our blog now!

      ALL HAIL TROLLANDIA!!

      Delete
    8. Where's the all of the above option?

      Delete
    9. Gonna be an entertaining day for the trolls and the footers, it looks like

      Delete
    10. I chose all of the above. Coonbo will have many meltdowns if he posts any today. He seemed to let the Joe account lay dormant most of yesterday, and he used his other accounts and posted anon. All of the above make Coonbo look like a flaming reject from Alf. Even the forestry guy schools him hard enough to induce liftoff. Heck, total strangers obliterate Joe, and they dont even have to type a reply. Just by reading Coonbos comments, they obliterate him, b/c they have common sense and just laugh at his stupidity. Although yesterday coonbo was going crazy with the copy and pastes. Especially the troll chart. I think he still thinks it bothers us.

      All Hail Trollandia, we own this blog, not no Coonbo

      Delete
    11. Got monkey suit? Got mental health??

      Looks like it's another morning baby sitting this idiot...

      (Sigh)

      Delete
    12. The forestry guy ran off angry again, Daniel never wins any debate around here, Dmaker suggesting that the requirement of footage presented with scientists is to be tested is negative is actually suppressing evidence whilst his argument that Munns and Medlrum ruled their own work out as a hoax is the most childish thing I've seen, and the fish in a barrel guy is easily the easiest most embarrassing troll after you.

      That about covers it.

      Delete
    13. It's getting hot in here

      Delete
    14. ... Not really this is child's play, like I said... I'm happy to baby sit.

      Delete
    15. Hope you brought in some padded helmets for them Joe so they don't further injure themselves thrashing around in fits of tardation.

      WOW, LOOK AT HOW I WENT LOWER CASE AND THEN UPPERCASE! SO CONFUSING FOR YOU. WHO ELSE COULD I BE? MORONS!

      Delete
    16. Joe's right,Daniel never wins a debate on Joes watch,Daniel is an arrogant lying loser who tells me he doesn't want to be my friend,what on earth made him think i would want him as a friend,he claims he works for one of Americas biggest publishing companies but can't afford to get his computer fixed,before posting as Honcho he posted using around 20 different accounts and then tried to ruin this blog with his MMG senior and fake Joe account along with his nieces and nephew trolls just as his blog was formed which it seems has failed before it even took off,why was that again?oh yeah here it is xx
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOdjCb4LwQY

      Delete
    17. NICE OF YOU TO ANNOUNCE YOURSELF^

      Delete
    18. Eva just can't get Dan off her mind. Goodness. Looks like she has a high school crush!!

      Delete
    19. TROLLS WITH THE SAME TIRED SH*T

      WHO FRICKEN CARES?

      Delete
    20. TROLLS TASTE LIKE CHICKEN.... ROTTEN CHICKEN

      BITING OFF THE HEADS AND SPITTING THEM OUT

      Delete
    21. ... Actually, I think you'll find that it is the trolls that can't get their hero Danny of their minds; Eva was responding in relevance to your posts.

      And nailed it I might add!

      Delete
    22. Lol@you kids still doing this.

      Delete
    23. Joe has a soft spot for trannys. And as usual, Coonbo is getting destroyed early in the morning

      Delete
    24. Wow, the tranny named Eva had her first meltdown over Daniel. Obviously Dans comments to the tranny really upset her. Poor little tranny

      Delete
    25. Hey Eva, when Dan crushed your self esteem, did you still cross dress that night?

      Delete
    26. ^ Would your momma approve of you defending trannys on a bigfoot blog?

      Delete
    27. HAS NO MOMMA SPAWNED OUT FROM UNDER AN ELEPHANT TURD^

      Delete
    28. Has no momma? lol. That was a great elephant turd comment too. Very original. Keep trying Coonbo, keep trying

      Delete
    29. ATE THE ELEPHANT TURD AFTER^

      EXPLAINS THE BREATH

      Delete
    30. ^ CHRISTOPHER CRANKSHAFT

      WOOOOOO!!!!

      Delete
    31. NOPE WRONG AGAIN

      ORDER ANOTHER LOAD OF ROCKS AND TRY AGAIN LATER

      Delete
    32. ^ CHRISTOPHER CRANKSHAFT

      WOOOOOO!!!!

      Delete
    33. NO NO NO YOUR ECHOING EMPTY CANYON OF A SKULL NEEDS A COUPLE MORE LOADS OF GRAVEL

      FOR GRAVEL DELIVERY DIAL 1800 EAT SH*T^

      Delete
    34. FOR CHRISTOPER CRANKSHFT JUST GO TO GOOGLE PLUS. HE CAN TELL YOU ABOUT GHOST HUNTING AND MAYBE TAKE YOUR PICTURE.

      WONDER WHAT HIS FRIENDS AND WIFE WOULD SAY IF THEY KNEW HE WAS TROLLING ON A BIGFOOT BLOG.

      Delete
    35. 5:36&5:45.a meltdown over Daniel?Daniel crushing my self esteem?you are kidding me right?I'm not the one with insecurity issues here,Let me see,someone calls Dan short and fat hes posts a picture of his nuts,someone calls him a fag and makes a point of saying just how much he loves women,if that's not low self esteem i don't know what is and as for you dippy trolls,tranny this tranny that,is that really supposed to bother me,yes dippy trolls i'm Transsexual and proud of it,i swear if you lot had a brain cell it would die of loneliness xx





      Oh and whats next?i know

      Tranny alert
      Eva's having a meltdown

      Try and think of something new xx

      Delete
    36. SO NOW I BREAK IT DOWN FOR YOU SAD LITTLE HEADLESS CHICKEN

      YOU CALL ME:
      KENT
      COONBO
      ALL CAPS
      CRANKSHAFT

      WRONG X 4

      NOW BACK INTO THE CLOSET TO EAT MORE TOENAILS

      Delete
    37. 5:36&5:45.a meltdown over Daniel?Daniel crushing my self esteem?you are kidding me right?I'm not the one with insecurity issues here,Let me see,someone calls Dan short and fat hes posts a picture of his nuts,someone calls him a f*g and makes a point of saying just how much he loves women,if that's not low self esteem i don't know what is and as for you dippy trolls,tranny this tranny that,is that really supposed to bother me,yes dippy trolls i'm Transsexual and proud of it,i swear if you lot had a brain cell it would die of loneliness xx





      Oh and whats next?i know

      Tranny alert
      Eva's having a meltdown

      Try and think of something new xx

      Delete
    38. NOT POSSIBLE FOR THEM TO THINK OF SOMETHING NEW THEY ARE WORKING OFF A SCRIPT

      Delete
    39. Butthurt post op tranny ^

      Delete
    40. NICE ATTEMPT AT BEING CREATIVE BUT:

      NOPE WRONG AGAIN

      ORDER ANOTHER LOAD OF ROCKS AND TRY AGAIN LATER

      Delete
    41. Wasn't talking to you homo.

      Delete
    42. ^WATCH WHERE YOU POINT YOUR ARROWS FREAK

      I WAS TALKING TO YOU

      Delete
    43. AH HAHAHA, The tranny had another meltdown over Dan campbell. Why dont you write some more paragraphs about how much you dont care about him tranny. You got so butt hurt that im surprised you remembered to tuck this morning. You are now just like Joe. Destroyed by Dan Campbell.

      Delete
    44. And the tranny comes forward and identifies herself as the imposter all caps. You cant fool us tranny

      Delete
    45. I never post Anon,just ask your boyfriend Daniel,he knows i don't xx

      Delete
    46. God Eva. You're so mean today.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. It's Joe's wife stumbling around looking for some one to pay attention to her.

      Delete
  3. Joe could not come up with a reasonable explanation for why patty is standing still at the start of the film.

    Also after 7 days he still has not provided a single link to a published paper that proves bigfoot.

    If that's not a schooling I don't know what is.

    Fish in a barrel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No doubt. But Coonbo wont see it like a normal person. He is one of 2 things. The most likely in my expert opinion is that Coonbo is a troll himself. He is either American or Canadian and far from Welsh. And probably run by a mod or mod friend. And of course he has numerous other accounts. The stupidity in the bigfoot world is prfound, but Coonbo takes it to another level. Even the stupidest of enthusiasts dont rehash the same crap over and over, while never really gaining any knowledge on the subject all together. I think Coonbo is troll bait. But i love it, so he can suck my ginger cookies anytime.

      The other option is that Coonbo is the most pathetic excuse for a bigfoot enthusiast thats ever lived. His lack of knowledge and idiocy know no bounds. There are people out there that stupid, and Coonbo could be one, but i think hes just a paid troll.

      One time Coonbo ran his hands over my chesapeake whiskers and then smeared egg string all over my body. What you think about that Coonbo?? In your face

      Delete
    2. "Patterson said "it turned a total of I think three times," the first time therefore being before the filming began."

      After 7 days, you have not presented a counter argument to the points that were put to you here;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/really-interesting-how-river-log-drive.html

      ... Not one of them, and you even disappear on the said thread after my comment obliterated you.

      You definitely enjoy patting your self on the back, tip for you though; actually win an argument first. I think you're the type to scream your own name in the mirror whilst naked.

      Something about fish?

      Delete
    3. And the winner is...

      FISH IN A BARREL GUY!!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. TROLLS SLEEPING IN THIS MORNING

      I KEPT THEM UP LATE LAST NIGHT CHASING THEM AROUND

      POOR SICK LITTLE FUC#S

      Delete
    5. Still waiting on that link joe.

      You can't even acknowledge that the link doesn't exist.

      Do you accept that there are no published papers proving bigfoot is real?

      Can you at least acknowledge this fact?

      Can you show enough maturity to admit that fact rather than diverting the subject?

      Delete
    6. ... No, you are maintaining a rhetorical argument that you know the answer to, that I know the answer to, in an effort to avoid answering what was presented to you as an explanation for your rhetorical rubbish.

      You with me?

      It's not about me acknowledging an obvious answer to a Bigfoot peer review that doesn't exist, it is now down to you to acknowledge the reasons why and you haven't the intelligence or the guts to even try and respond to what I put to you 7 days ago.

      Maturity? Man up and respond to whats's been put top you and not maintain a question you know the answer to like child.

      Delete
    7. Coonbo getting schooled as normal and has no defense, so he sticks to the same old copy and pastes

      Delete
    8. Respond to what? As far as I know you haven't offered up an actual bigfoot, only wild conspiracy theories.

      You get schooled here daily with your lack of a bigfoot. You are defending something which you can not even prove exists to start with.

      Delete
    9. Coonbo doesnt care at all. He is a paid troll or mod to be here and spam the blog and act as troll bait. Its either that or he is the stupidest most pathetic bigfoot enthusiast to ever live. Coonbo is a super troll himself to bring in other trolls and blog hits. Coonbo is the ultimate mod/paid troll

      Delete
    10. ... And why no offered Bigfoot?

      This is what was presented to you here;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/really-interesting-how-river-log-drive.html

      ... And you haven't presented a counter argument not to consider the reasons believed in that thread. Therefore; what is implied by presenting you that thread, is my answer.

      You dig?

      Delete
    11. DId I ggive you ,, permission to use YOU DIG?? You dig!!??,,,,

      ..thieves!!!,,,,

      BD

      Delete
    12. My counter argument: bigfoot don't exist.

      Obliterated.

      Delete
    13. What, you didnt know BD?? Coonbo not only blames all his shortcumming on others, but he also steals what he can from everyone else. He then adds that to his copy/paste library

      Delete
    14. ... My counter argument is that institutions retract involvement in results that confirm this creature is real.

      Turd.

      Delete
    15. Self corrected after multiple tests showed nothing of merit.

      Delete
    16. Hah!

      Big Doris called you out on stealing catch phrases!

      Delete
    17. ... A statement you can't back up with any source what so ever.

      Too easy.

      Delete
    18. ^ Case proved. After Coonbo was called out, he got mad and now blamed his stealing of catch phrases on others. Poor little Coonbo, thats a sign of meltdown

      Delete
    19. My previous comment was aimed at 6:11... Turd.

      Delete
    20. ^ Here we have Coonbo admitting he was posting anonymously at 6:14 tryin to make himself look better. This is one for the books. You better delete that comment real quick Coonbo. You pathetic little pansy

      Delete
    21. This joke in a suit sermonizing atheist sure is a whiner.

      Delete
  4. If you ask Coonbo Joe, he will tell you that that is definetly a bigfoot. Because its the opinion of Meldrum. CAn i get a copy and paste. lord have mercy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks just like Leaping Russian Yeti.

      Delete
    2. IT LOOKS LIKE YOU SUCK BACK TO THE CLOSET

      Delete
    3. ^ Coonbo getting destroyed as per

      Delete
    4. YOU TOO LAME-O CLOSET TIME WITH YOUR FREAKY FRIEND

      Delete
    5. I CANT STAND YOU TROLLS, YOU HAVE RUINED THIS BLOG!! SHAWN, PLEASE MODERATE!!!

      ALL CAPS

      Delete
  5. People are photoshopped onto the still photo. Nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Afraid of girls. And park rangers.

      Delete
    2. My wife would have an issue with that and I admire the work that the forestry commission in the States do... The information block is not down to them, but down to the top 15 people in charge.

      Delete
    3. Coonbo Joe trying to fool people into thinking he has ever been kissed

      Delete
    4. 15? Is that an exact number? Why not another number? Are you just making up more stuff?

      Delete
    5. While you spend every waking moment on a bigfoot blog, I wonder who your wife spends her every waking moment on? I hope a park ranger. The irony would be too much, don't you think?

      Delete
    6. Coonbo has no idea what number it is. He is just making up numbers. He must be confused from all the copy and pasting. Poor little Coonbo, the paid troll

      Delete
    7. If he doesn't get off the computer and "paste" his wife soon, she's going to call up Bobo for a little" investigation" of her own.

      Delete
    8. 5:38... Because that's the estimation Paulides gives and he's made that estimation out of respect for the hard work rangers do.

      Delete
    9. Joe knows this b/c he read it in Paulides book. That means it must be true........solid Coonbo logic there

      Delete
    10. ^ Back peddling on " Park Rangers are the American Waffen SS".

      Delete
    11. So...it's just some bullcrap made up number. Just what I figured. Estimation guesstimation. Al Gore estimated he created the Internet, G.W. Bush estimated American won the war in Iraq before he left presidency.

      Delete
    12. Of course its just made up. Coonbo has no idea what he is talking about. He just scans the net, finds some figures he likes, saves them, and then copies and pastes them randomly. This is one thing that has made the mod/paid troll who runs his account so effective. Its perfect troll bait. Long live the king troll, Coonbo himself

      Delete
    13. Not really... The cooperation that Paulides has had in his research from forestry rangers speaks for itself, you just remember that it was down to a ranger coming to him that his research into missing people began. The cooperation he's had stops at various stages that would imply a select few restraining the process of disclosing information, now that could be 15, 20, 100... The point is it's not the fault of the forestry commissioners, but the forestry commission... If that makes sense.

      Delete
    14. So you admit Coonbo that you just made up the number. Notice how once Coonbo was called out on it, he tries to change the subject. Next he will be blaming him making up that number on someone else.

      Delete
    15. Nope, it's a direct quote;

      http://youtu.be/Q1BK_1xfvK8

      ... From 13 minutes on you will hear it from Paulides.

      Who's changing the subject? Bro, you so dense it's hilarious.

      Delete
    16. Ambiguous language..check

      Special pleading..check

      Tripping over his words..check

      All that's missing in this meltdown recipe is some copy paste off topic stuff.

      Delete
    17. ... I don't think making an statement on information being withheld is open to any other interpretation because the only estimation is of the number of people who are withholding that information, not that information is being withheld.

      Missing woman and children is not special pleading.

      The only tripping is you thinking your existence is justified.

      Delete
    18. ^ Wants to have Dave Paulides love child.

      Delete
    19. Penalized for believing something Paulides wrote?

      Why? You bleeve all that Long, Bob H, Pate say.

      Delete
  6. It's this dudes ex-boyfriend jeez

    ReplyDelete
  7. Absolute fabulous new sighting report on the BFRO from Fulton County, Ark. It involves a witness that had to stop 10 feet away in the road as a juvenille bigfoot was on the road. A patty size female with breasts comes out of the woods and scoops it up and places the young one on her back, which then grabs the mother around the short neck, and they go to the woods. Witness then gets out of car after the go into the woods, only to have a rock land on the top of his car. He turns and six feet behind the car is the massive, over 8 foot tall, barrel chested male looking at him with piercing eyes. The male then screams a thunderous roar at the witness who immediately climbs in and drives away. Artist Sybilla Irwin paints two pictures of the male one with mouth open and they are good, and human looking face again. Best Bfro report I have read in a long time.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats cool Chuck! Could you link us up?

      Delete
    2. Go away Chuck, you stupid sped, we dont want your kind here.

      Delete
    3. I like the part where he put the broad in a head lock. It has Arkansas written all over it. Come to think of it, so does a baby sitting in the middle of the street.

      Delete
    4. 5 41. Just go to bfro.net. Click on reports recently added. It is the third one down Jan. 2008, Arkansas, Fulton County.

      Chuck

      Delete
    5. Bigfoot must carry rocks in their pockets for occasions just like this.

      Delete
    6. ^ It's an Arkansas thing. Hilary Clinton still does it to this day. That's why she always wears Kevlar pant suits. A skirt could never hold up 35 lbs of gravel and stones.

      Delete
    7. Chuck!!

      Thanks for that, I'll check it out now...

      Delete
    8. Chuck, Joe wants to give you his Coonbo in the mouth, any questions?

      Delete
    9. UNLIKE YOUR EMPTY HEAD WHICH CAN HOLD TONS OF ROCKS AND GRAVEL^^^

      Delete
    10. ^ Coonbo is in a fuss this morning, switching between anon accounts and his Coonbo account. Hey Coonbo, how much do you get paid to troll here? Or do you do it b/c you owe Shawn favors?

      Delete
    11. You did get destroyed there didnt you Coonbo, i can understand why that hurt. So how much do you get paid to troll here Coonbo?

      Delete
    12. MORE PARANOID IMAGININGS^

      Delete
    13. ... Bro... You do realize that it's blatantly obvious to everyone why you do what you do.

      Can tou remember when you expected everyone to believe that you were being paid in drugs for trolling?

      AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 2:38:00 PM PST
      When I said , I will smash the faces of all bigfoot believers and Coonbo Joe, I men't it. You think im just a fat little geek that cant get hot women,, Nope ,,IM 6-5 260lbs of muscle and a14"johnson..soo when I say I will smash your faces, I Mean it. and I dont live in a basement...

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/watch-breakdown-of-bigfoot-caught-from.html?m=0

      ... What a loser! Ha ha!!

      Delete
    14. 6:08 has clearly never saw how much 1 ton of chert rock is.

      Delete
    15. CLEARLY UNAWARE OF HOW LARGE AND CAVERNOUS HIS EMPTY HEAD IS^

      Delete
    16. Different ppl jizzle. Weed is a physically harmless drug and used by the majority of bigfooters.

      Delete
    17. 6:39...

      So you maintain that you were offered weed to troll this blog?

      Delete
    18. The largest man in the worlds cubic feet size still isn't remotely close to the cubic feet of that much rock.

      Boy the trolls have all caps super butthurt today.

      Delete
    19. TROLL CURRENTLY TRYING TO SEW UP HIS OWN ASS

      NOT ALL CAPS FOOL DO THE MATH

      Delete
    20. It was a joke...jesus

      Delete
    21. STICK A BANDAID ON IT AND HAVE A LOLLIPOP

      Delete
    22. Let me clear this up a little bit...

      ME NOT TROLL POSTING YOU THINK POSTING.

      TROLL YOU THINK POSTING NOT SAME TROLL YOU REPOSTING COMMENT.

      JOE REPOST MORE TROLL THAN 1.

      JOE THINK ALL TROLL ONE TROLL BUT JOE MISTAKE.

      MANY TROLL.

      WEED FROM BOBO GUD.

      BUTTHURT FOOTER MAD.

      Delete
    23. WHAT A STUPID FRICKEN DIATRIBE OF CRAP

      UNIMPRESSED YOU ASSWIPE

      ASK FOR A LICK OF HIS LOLLIPOP

      Delete
    24. CHRISTOPHER CRANKSHAFT IS ON A ROLL TODAY WOOOOO!!!!

      Delete
    25. NOPE WRONG AGAIN

      ORDER ANOTHER LOAD OF ROCKS AND TRY AGAIN LATER

      Delete
    26. ^ Somebody has has little feelings hurt. Poor Coonbo supporter. Poor baby

      Delete
    27. "SIMPLY REPEATING YOURSELF OVER AND OVER AGAIN DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE"

      NOW GO AND GET SOME STITCHES, YOUR MESSING UP THE FLOOR

      Delete
  8. This is awesome! Best evidence ever!

    ReplyDelete
  9. The bigfoot hypothesis is tested daily. And every day it fails. Something joes mind can not comprehend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. logic doesnt come into play for Coonbo. That probably is b/c he is a paid troll or mod though

      Delete
    2. HANGING ON THE ASS END LIKE THE DINGLE BERRY OF COMMENTS^

      Delete
    3. ... No it's not, for example; to test a piece of footage that is backed by credible scientists, you would have to prove that their claim of the creature being organic is false.

      How do you prove that?

      That's just one example.

      Delete
    4. "How do you do that?"

      By referencing that those scientists preface their own paper by stating they cannot rule out a hoax.

      Therefore, it's not conclusive proof of an organic creature. It's the musings of one overly attached former prop master and one associate professor from ISU.

      Simple as that. No more no less.

      Delete
    5. No... Child...

      That doesn't render their research as nothing to answer, and they firmly stand by their work. It's not conclusive proof once it's tested and shown not to be... Not because of an unbiased reflection.

      Delete
    6. Don't get testy at me just because they preface their own work with that statement.

      Take it up with them. If they were 100% then they wouldn't feel the need to put it on their work. Melba didn't put a preface on her Denovo publication saying anything like that nor does anyone else putting in for serious publication.

      So yes, it renders their work as musings, not scientific proof.

      Bubble -> burst.

      Sorry.

      Delete
    7. Test it, then it's not scientific proof... It says it all when you have to snake out of your biggest obstacle, to then consolidate on something like that. I never realized that 'got monkey suit' held so much weight for you to resort to something so embarrassing... Especially from you of all people. A preface on something as radical as this subject would be totally natural; an honest reflection, and if Melba came across so sure then it was because she had to be considering the way her work was treated.

      Show me that preface and I'll show you inumerable statements to the contrary.

      Got monkey suit? No?? Didn't think so...

      Delete
    8. So Melba was so sure she didn't include an asterisk but the publication in RHI on ISU's server by Munns-Meldrum isn't "so sure" so they added the asterisk to the first page of the paper.

      Statement this, statement that. Don't be upset at me because they use it on their own publication. In fact, Meldrum's talked on many occasions about not being 100%. He says it on many of his televised appearances and even on the JRE Podcast.

      He's gone so far as to address the fact that every cast in his possession could potentially be hoaxed or misidentified.

      Munns isn't a scientist anyway, he's a mediocre puppeteer who hasn't worked in the movie business since the very early 1980s.

      Monkey or bust.

      Delete
    9. You still haven't provided that preface.

      Stop worming like a child... The plain and simple fact is, that to test the hypothesis that the creature in that footage is organic, is to present a case that it's not organic. It was put to you yesterday and the day before, that it is the appropriate manner in which any scientist should present unbiased work, because until it is tested, then how can they be 100% sure? I expect that they are also aware of his radical this subject is.

      I myself am 100% sure and I'm not relaxing on a childish avenue that avoids drawing attention to the fact that this work has not been tested.

      Munns isn't a scientist, he's a costume expert of 30 years. Since the 80's he's also lectured and studied in computer special effects. He's an expert... To go with him we have a primatologist, an anthropologist and a wildlife biologist. How do you test that hypothesis? By manning up and not focussing on a moment of unbiased reflectance.

      Got monkey suit Danny?

      Delete
    10. Got bigfoot?

      No?

      Game set and match.

      Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

      Delete
    11. It's on ISU's RHI publication. Go find it yourself, should take .15 seconds.

      Sincerely,

      Not Danny.

      Delete
    12. Got monkey suit?

      No?

      There's your Bigfoot.

      No, no... The pleasure's all mine.

      Delete
    13. Man, Joe and Eva dream about Daniel. Goodness gracious. He's on their thoughts and tongues all day!

      Delete
    14. ... Consider it manners, you address who you know you're talking to, and I know when I'm talking to Daniel.

      Delete
    15. The joke in a suit nut seems to have morphed into Sharon Shill in this string of comments. The comments don't have some of the Campz characteristics.

      Delete
  10. I concur this photo is photoshopped - shame they didn't fix that guys hair. Not brilliant evidence. But I'm sure the search will continue. Fascinating comments thread as always - hats off to Joe for keeping things logical, respectful and informative :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pants off for the tall chick before Joe starts flirting!!!

      Delete
    2. WHAT THE HELL DOES IS MATTER, ALL YOU TROLLS DO IS TALK ABOUT ANAL SEX WITH EACH OTHER

      Delete
    3. NOPE WRONG AGAIN

      ORDER ANOTHER LOAD OF ROCKS AND TRY AGAIN LATER

      Delete
    4. I wonder if this is the transvestite eva posting under an alias.

      Delete
    5. HAHAHAHAHA WRONG X 5 PARANOID IDIOT

      Delete
    6. Who cares about being right? It's all about dragging discussion to the trash. Someone tosses out a name, you just continue the cycle of dragging it into the gutter.

      You don't want to talk about bigfoot that bad or you would just ignore it like normal people, troll.

      Delete
  11. Looks like Bigfoot is doing the hokey pokey behind the photo-shopped people.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sometimes you just have to shove your marbles up your anus and shout BINGO!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. ^Don't say that at the nursing home. Nothing good will come of it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If she is referring to Solitude Ski Resort In Utah, I would say its a skier, snowboarder... That Place is packed with snow-bound adventure seekers this time of year, and as a person who is up big Cottonwood canyon ALOT (summer and winter) I have never heard of any BF sightings.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Joe, you should really spend more time at the BFF. They have a whole section devoted to the PGF. You can go and talk about it all day if you wish rather than turn every thread here into a discussion about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe suffers from perceived big fish little pond syndrome. He feels he cannot post on different mediums, as it would be some type of indication he was losing some fictitious battle.

      He would rather huff and puff to a bunch of trolls and occasional people looking for "bigfoot evidence" than have legitimate discussions with real researchers and habituaters on a moderated forum.

      I think it might be an image issue or he may be afraid that if he digs too deep he may not like what he reads.

      Bottom line: There's a reason they call him Big Jim Rennie for a reason.

      Delete
    2. If he was genuinely a guy from wales with an interest in bigfoot he would be there.

      The reason he isn't is because joe is just a persona that he uses. He likely already has an account on the BFF or has done previously and been banned. Hence why he can't sign up.

      He knows way too much about the ins and outs of footery to be just some guy from Wales who started posting on this blog one day.

      He exhibits all the traits of a textbook indoctrinated bff footer. He is either that or a jrefer playing the role of a footer. If thats the case then hats off to the guy because he plays the role superbly.

      Delete
    3. I read the threads regularly thank you Don, and I enjoy it around here.

      I think you'll find I don't initiate the PGF talk around here, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to respond.

      And anyway... What else is there to read otherwise; "Coonbo Joe" comments?

      Delete
    4. 8:32...

      Thank you for the compliment of overthinking my knowledge for someone across the pond. The truth is you don't have to be American to have an interest in cryptozoology.

      ; )

      Delete
    5. I tend to agree with the analysis by 8:29/8:32. I don't really believe that Joe is some random dude in Wales. I don't really care that much either. But if he was someone who was keenly interested in discussing this topic, this is really, really not the place to do it.

      BFF would be a much better venue for discussion. There are plenty of loonies there too, but the threads are pinned and you can avoid topics that are obviously crap like the new one about whether the Dogman and Bigfoot are buddies.

      I don't see why anyone who wants to learn more and have anything close to a decent discuss would limit themselves entirely to this site. I suspect Joe might be a banned BFF member as well possibly. These are not ad hominem attacks, just my own personal speculation and ultimately has no direct bearing on claims made by anyone. Claims stand or fall with evidence. Not whether someone lives in Wales and fears the BFF or not.

      Delete
    6. Quite a lot of speel there Don, I'm fine schooling you right here thanks.

      Siolen.

      Delete
    7. Joe is a textbook case of wanting something to argue about.

      He doesn't like civil moderated discussion. I assume he was banned from BFF for his attitude and he can't sign up.

      He enjoys muppets, anonymous posters with no accountability, yelling, and relating everything to PGF and MK Davis.

      He wouldn't last a day in Dmakers world on BFF.

      Delete
    8. ... Oh, and... thanks for the compliment Don, I do know my stuff.

      I was obviously worth all that thought... I suspect you stew on what I get you on quite nicely.

      ; )

      Delete
    9. You're right 8:55... Such am example of how to conduct one's self isn't he... Our Dmaker?

      http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/37621-bigfoot-research-still-no-evidence-continued/

      ... At the end of the day, I don't take myself too seriously and it's fun being able to use my obnoxious wit around you ego-makers.

      Delete
    10. LOL. Joe, no I don't stew about anything to do with you. I'm not sure what you think that link is supposed to demonstrate. ( though I do find it a bit creepy that you have a link to a thread that I participated in so handy)


      Delete
    11. Code for: Banned from BFF and doesn't actually are for mature discussion.

      I suspect he must have been shamed from the BFF and takes out his pent up frustrations here because he can't post with proper etiquette.

      Delete
    12. Don...

      I just came across it and thought it would be wonderful to see you flap your way off your pedestal. You're as ill mannered as anyone here and no more intelligent as anyone else and you wouldn't come back if I didn't make you think about what I've got you on.

      9:10...

      Again, thank you for the complement, I do know my stuff. However, it seems your paranoia is now transcending forums instead of threads.

      Delete
    13. 9:21 Prime example of sniffing his own farts.

      F*ch yeah.

      Delete
    14. Folks, this series of meltdowns was one for the books. Coonbo has been obliterated once again today.

      Delete
    15. Well, at least we know why Joe doesn't post at BFF too.

      He was banned.

      Poor fella seekin' vengeance and retribution.

      Delete
    16. Joe, I've never said that I couldn't be ill mannered. I've probably had more warning points than anyone in the history of the BFF. Where did you get that I said or implied otherwise?

      Let me give you a tip. When you referee your own debate you look like a petulant child. You might want to stop proclaiming what you have "got" people on. Why not let others draw their own conclusions? Pretty sure they don't require you to do that for them.

      Delete
    17. Also, simply repeating something over and over again does not make it true. Where did I say that you "know your stuff?"

      Delete
    18. Don't look so clever now do you Don? My conclusion is your angry and stewed too long, after suggesting I'm an idiot and petulant. Aren't you lowering the tone of the thread there, old boy?

      Yor suggestion that I'm not from Wales ("coo-coo"), suggests that I would then be someone from your end to know the stuff I do about this subject, whilst your suggestion that I am someone who used to post on the BFF, would suggest you find me knowledgable enough.

      Oh... And I can assure you I've never even posted a comment on a blog until the last 10-12 months or whatever I've been here.

      Paranoia on folks!

      Delete
    19. Joe, try taking a ride on the reality train once in a while. I'm not angry at all. I never once suggested that I find you knowledgeable one way or another. Stop putting words in my mouth. That is some twisted logic you got going there.

      I really don't care how much you think you know about this topic. It's really not much to brag about. There are probably people out there proud of how much they know about the Tooth Fairy or Santa Clause.

      Your demonstration of your knowledge of this topic is to copy and paste other people's thoughts. Gee, how impressive...

      Delete
    20. Since when has there been some kind of intelligence prerequisite to post at BFF?

      There are some straight morons that post there...

      Seems to me that Joe is just making up more garbage.

      Delete
    21. What's the matter Don?! Anyone think you're getting a little upset there!!

      Seems to me you're overthinking there 9:57... Go and have a lay down.

      Delete
    22. You are the only person thinking that, Joe.

      And you said "knowledgeable enough" in context to posting at BFF. -- implying one must be intelligent on the subject to post there. Nothing could be further from the truth.

      Delete
  16. Or snow-shoer, maybe x-country skier

    ReplyDelete