This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
1st
ReplyDeleteIt has to be said... These pictures are excellent, every single time!
DeleteGet the caulks outta yer mouth when you post here, boy.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteMan,, Joe is already taking a spanking
DeleteIt doesnt take much hes almost too easy. I didnt even have to mention his mums aids
DeleteHe likes spankings. He also likes little boys peters in his mouth.
DeleteIm spankin ya joe.
DeleteAsk shawn....
DeleteWhere is ernie? A.k.a. Joe's little man friend.
DeleteJoes busy smoking ernies muppet caulk
DeleteBloke in a suit joe. Bloke in a suit.
DeleteYoure not funny. Go away.
Why do I know that you know what's coming next?
DeleteSilly boy.
Anyway... See ya later, psychos!
DeleteThe Canadian psychologists would have a field day studying your pitiful little cyber worlds.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!
Well, because all your emails to shawn yesterday went unanswered. The blog got hacked and now all the trolls are back. Is that correct? Its going to be a fun day!
Delete:) thanks joe.
Deleterun along to mum joe dont forget her azt meds.
Deleteyoure overplaying your hand and revealing too much.
Long Live Mucklegrunt!
DeleteLong Live Poop In A Jar Guy!
Long Live Bigfoot Evidence!
All Hail Trollandia!
I just trolled Joes 1:11 link
DeleteNow thats a smoking an a pwning all in one.
Joe, like I told shawn, when you start being respectful, the trolls will leave and this will be a decent blog again. What say you? Ha! Don't say anything.
DeleteJoe's mother is a whore.
DeleteJoe's mother is a wh ore.
DeleteTell us again but do it with spaces between your letters 1:48. I can't break through the html's.
DeleteJoe must have had an episode, he has started deleting comments again. Which as we all know, immediately follows a meltdown.
DeleteHuge obsessions with Joe here ^
DeleteWasn't Ragin Cajun Kent Skeptards name in high school?
ReplyDelete....THIRD!!!!
DeleteJoe got pwned like mulder in the dark
ReplyDeleteTrue dat
DeleteAll those calculations are based on calculations based on calculations based on assumptions.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't make them facts.
I can go to a zoo and see a tarsier. I could find a specimen of an onager if I really wanted to.
I can't go to an Astrorarium and see a "black hole."
There is, in fact, much more tangible, testable evidence for sasquatch than there is for most astronomical "facts."
But you aren't used to thinking about this.
Most of what we know is what we think we know because someone else fed it to us.
Show me an astronomer's slide show of his visit to that black hole and I'll shut up.
I mean, please.
Wow, very well said.
DeleteBy my own standards I cannot go to a zoo to see a bigfoot.
Delete^^^ Kent Skeptard
DeleteIts just too easy.
ReplyDeleteBloke in a suit.
Show us the verified evidence of bigfoot? We can do it no problem for every other species. Why not bigfoot? Too easy. Cos it don't exist.
Royally smoked.
The funniest thing is the footers will attempt to shoehorn anything they can to be "evidence" of bigfoot. None of it is scientificly acceptable of course but it sure does give us a hilarious circus show to watch. No complaints here.
Let's go back to the packham bigfoot suit that joe and the resident butthurt footer and poster boy for footer stupidity were talking about earlier. Do you really look at that and think that was a recreation of the pgf? Of course it wasn't. If it was an actual recreation attempt you'd think they would at least get the colour right. The bbc just got a costume company to make them a bigfoot suit and that is what they got. This is a classic example of one of many failed arguments put forth by the footers. If we want to look at a patty recreation how about we actually look at one rather than using one that clearly wasnt meant to be a patty recreation.
We have 2 examples of these. We have the dfoot recreation and the blevins recreation. Both excellent examples. Blevins recreated the arm proportions perfectly but his budget was too low to get a similar style fur. Dfoots recreation showed identical "muscle" and bulk, quite excellent really. This is the same guy that made patty bleevers on the bff look like fools when he photoshopped patty onto a different background and all the bleevers said it was an obvious suit. He embarrassed them so bad they banned him and swept the whole thing under the giant footers rug of ignorance. Also lets not forget that side by side shot of a gemora butt with the patty butt. Identical.
And anyway the whole notion of requiring an identical replication is nonsense anyway. The footers know this which is why they use it, instead of doing something like, oh I dont know, find a real life specimen that matches patty.
Its just too easy.
Fish in a barrel.
Joe has now been smoked once and for all. Watch as he will squirm to try and find something to copy and paste. Joe, enjoy this ultimate pwning you pathetic blowhard.
DeleteGot monkey suit?
DeleteToo easy.
Man they got you on strings, Joe.
ReplyDeleteGRAYs doing DNA testing - they been doing it for years
ReplyDelete