We Now Know Who's Creating These Life-Like Images of Bigfoot
'Project Sasquatch' creator Joe Mastroianni is claiming credit for these awesome renditions of Bigfoot. According to Joe, he starts with a real photograph of a person, and then photoshops the hell out of it to produce these fine quality images. If you haven't seen some of it yet, here are ones we posted here last week:
Joe has been working on a media website. You can check it out here: wavlite.com
First!!
ReplyDeletethe newest picture looks like Ro, ha ha ha ha.
DeleteOMG !!!
DeleteIt's Gerry Garcia !!!!
LONG LIVE MUCKLEGRUNT!!!
DeleteLONG LIVE ANONY!!!
LONG LIVE POOP IN A JAR GUY!!!
LONG LIVE BIGFOOT EVIDENCE!!!
ALL HAIL TROLLANDIA!!!
Hail, hail Trollandia, and it's blessed leader, Poop in a Jay Guy!
DeleteJoe fitz got smoked
ReplyDeleteLooks like a bunch of extras from an attempt to remake "Island of Dr. Moreau"...Complete wastes of time- the original will never be topped...Charles Laughton pwns all...
ReplyDeleteGo fuck yourself troll,this site is for believers.
Delete3:37 how DARE you.
DeleteYou don't get to do that here.
Scientists really annoy me because they won't let my fantasy monkey man be real. Even though I know there is no actual bigfoot they are being really mean and won't let us fulfill our fantasies.
^ Hi Mr. Joe Black! Welcome to the comment section of BFE!
Delete3:37.. if this site was only for believers that would eliminate deniers, skeptics, fence-sitters,trolls and con men..That would leave 3 retards like yourself that 'know' bigfoot exists...
DeleteGo start your own blog and stop trying to dictate how Shawn runs his you lazy leach...lol..
It would also exclude the mentally ill, the socially inept, the terrified and the down right dumb. Lucky for you it's not eh?
Delete4:03. I'm proud to be among the "retard" believers. Tell ya what. Why don't you and I exchange a few view. You pick three subjects. I'll discuss all three topics of your choice for 5 minutes. We can let everyone else decide who is really "retarded". I suggest it's the dip shit you see when you brush your tooth in the morning.
DeleteHey bro!!
DeleteRelax Joe, I was just trolling the guy who told me to eff myself..lol..Btw, what probability do you assign to the existence of bigfoot? Surely, you are not 100% certain(who truely is?) but you sound like you'd go as high as 90-99%...
DeleteIn a bad mood Joe. Was trying to look at Kelly Shaws content and Timbergiants and all I saw were the same ridiculous arguments from these fucking pillow biters. Joe. I'm quite prepared to smoke em. You up for it?
DeleteJoe is 100% and will never admit to being wrong
DeletePerhaps. Perhaps. I'm more interested in you. I want you to educate me today. Tell me why I should accept PGF as fake. Deny the existence of Bigfoot and just give up. Science IS searching for answers and this isn't the intro to MonsterQuest.
DeleteScience isnt searching for answers. We already know the answer. No monkey. Scientists spend their time more wisely solving relevant real problems, not chasing magical monkeys round America
DeleteOn 7:33. Maybe you are bored. Certainly you are boring. But in either case, we have a grainy, shaky film proving Bryan Sykes exists. Can't you tag out to a quasi intelligent partner?
DeleteSounds like you got smoked mike and are walking away from the argument.
DeleteNever in this thread or any other. Rarely if ever in my life. The only thing that has smoked me is high quality THC. Certainly not you. Not here. Not now. Not ever.
Delete7:13...
DeleteSorry bro, I'm a little too defensive these days! Not the first time I have apologised to you either!! HA! I am 100% sure that these creatures exist bro.
7:24...
I have been wrong, I will be wrong again, and on the grander scheme of things I know nothing about Bigfoot... But one thing I am not wrong about is that Bigfoot is real and Sykes is coming.
7:33...
Science is asking the questions, Sykes' study would confirm that (Duh?) Oh, and no monkey just giant hairy people.
Mike!!
Got a little busy suddenly, but I'll be keeping an eye out and yes! Let's get at them, bro!!
7:49...
You've never smoked anyone... But you've certainly 'smoked' someone before.
Peace.
Joe. Signing out. Sorry I was chippy. I was just looking for the smart skeptic to say something new, fresh or credible. Turns out that we discovered the real cryptozoological creature that doesn't exist. The creative skeptic. Have a good day.
DeleteJOE, why do you have to come ruin ALL the fun of TROLLANDIA? Wait. You ARE the biggest troll of all.
DeleteYou'll never win here. Nevernevernever.
Mulder went a bit quiet after ketchum self published didn't he?
ReplyDeleteFor the munns work to be scientific he would have to release full scans of every frame in the film. But he won't of course not while rogers wife is still getting royalties from the film.
ReplyDeleteAlso he wouldn't want anyone to be able to see the diaper butt and obvious suit artifacts in high detail would he?
Also he says the skeleton that fits inside patty is not human. A lie of course. Patty does not have human proportions because patty is not a naked human. It is a human in a suit. A suit designed to change those proportions. The proportions are not even that far off human anyway but the footers will wildly exaggerate having patty as some big old quadropedal ape. Its a bloke in a suit. A bad suit. No amount of filming a womans breast will change that.
Munns should move on to aliens or something.
The proportions are supported by finger bending and extended toes... Those aren't lies; those are obstacles for you to negotiate. Man up and deal with it.
DeleteG-g-g-got monkey suit??
Peace.
You can not prove the fingers bend. The angle the camera is looking at on the hand certainly changes but the film is not clear enough to show individual finger movement.
DeleteEven if the fingers do move it is not important. The "extended" arm length is added at the top of the arms by shoulder pads. A human fits those arm proportions just fine.
I can prove the finger bend... Because the fingers bend in the footage. If the fingers move, then the creature's proportions are what we suggest they are and therefore the creature is organic tissue and therefore real. The video is clear enough to see it, denying that is not confronting it and therefore an admittance of not being able to explain it and a win for us.
DeleteIf the fingers bend, laughably, it is important, because the arm length, when paired with the leg length, is not achievable even with these imaginary shoulder pads of yours. A human does not fit those proportions.
Peace.
Joe you are aware that a human in a suit will have different proportions to the same human without the suit on? That is the idea of a suit. Costume making 101.
DeleteCould a human fit in the pgf suit? Yep
Does bigfoot exist? Nope
What is the logical, rational, reasonable, probable, scientific solution to the pgf? Man in a suit.
Schooled.
It's none of those things. It cannot be determined what it is. But by negative inference we can virtually eliminate a man in a suit. That argument is totally unsupported, Find one costume expert capable at that time. They don't exist. It's simply physically impossible to replicate the gate and the limb proportions are all wrong. You guys need to regroup.
DeleteBy bigfoot not existing we can eliminate it being a bigfoot
DeleteBy you offering only your opinion to make that supposition while real experts are examining that question as I type this we can eliminate your opinion as being credible or relevant.
DeleteAnon 6:23...
DeleteNow that was a schooling.
Opinion? Its a fact that no shred of evidence of a bigfoot exists ever.
DeleteNow here is where you simply implode. My God. Don't you realize a blanket denial only covers your own logic. Kelly Shaw has a great looking 18+ inch looking footprint on the next post over and you are typing ridiculous absurdities. Is Kelly Shaw hoaxing?
DeleteDenial? There is nothing to deny. Its not like you've dropped a dead bigfoot on my doorstep and I've gone "nope bigfoot don't exist".
DeleteIs Kelly shaw hoaxing? Who cares. Show us the monkey already. Shouldn't be too hard if we are to believe thousands of people are seeing these things.
You just stated there wasn't one single shred of evidence so I directed your waning attention all the way over to the neighboring post. Now you have ignored our entire prior conversation and are challenging me to deliver to Anonymous you a Dead Bigfoot. Well. Since you can't follow out your own evidence argument without jumping to the end game allow me. Dr Sykes will identify his DNA. There will be no denying it. And then someone will truly begin looking for a type specimen with a real budget. And they won't look like Jim Lebus. And they won't think like you.
DeleteYou don't know what sykes results are.
DeleteNo. But I bet a much smarter skeptic than you I could guess. Stay tuned. In the mean time read a book. For you I would suggest, "Are you there God, it's me Margret?" It's a Judy Blume classic about a young girl getting her first period. She's scared and confused. Pay attention now. Could help ya
DeleteSykes is coming... Scared?
DeleteJudas, the PGF is evidence, and is far more than a "shred." Get a grip, please, skepfools. Can you not evolve to the level of skeptic at least?
Delete5:41, I can prove that Patty's fingers bend, move, curl, flex, are prehensile:
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lze64cwcbLs
Try watching the damned thing, less than 3 minutes of your time.
5:41, that is hopeless confusion on your part re shoulder pads explaining arm length.
DeleteI don't care how high shoulder pads could be, you will not LOWER the hands to the knees by adding shoulder pads!!!
Have you come from the JREF or what?
Do you claim MENSA membership?
Seriously, that is one fat wet dense statement and inability to understand simplicity on your part.
Excuse me while I fall on the floor in howling hysterics over your shoulder-pads-explain-arm-length-theory.
Yes people, if you add shoulder pads, you will stretch and lengthen the arms so that they reach the knees!!! It's like magic!!!
Hi im joe fitz and welcome to jackass
ReplyDeleteHi jackass
DeleteHey Mike...
DeleteGot a week off work next week, will put everything together and start the ball rolling again. Been bogged down with work a bit.
Hope all is well bro.
It is. But they aren't getting off easy today Joe. They just aren't I need one skeptic to prove they can argue without absurdities or its going to ruin it for me. It will be simply ignorant fanaticism Hell I feel like reviving the "Skeptic Mike" persona to help these dipshits out. Where's Honcho? At least he seems like a worthy adversary.
DeleteJoe's starring in a new show called I'm a Dick. It's directed by his mom.
Deletethis ^^^^ is why we know your loosing the argument. You resort to 12 year old comments. If you don't believe, you can leave!
DeleteHi im joe fitz and this is the beehive limo
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and this is the aligator tightrope
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and this is golf course airhorn
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and this is urban kayak
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and this is medieval shopping carts
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and this is ice barrel jumping
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and this is blindfold skateboarding
ReplyDeleteHi im joe fitz and this is the poo cocktail
ReplyDeleteArss-winker...
ReplyDeleteHow about we now focus on your apparent fear of being wrong? Let's...
What type of person would accuse anyone else for bottling out of a 'loser leaves town' bet, whilst he himself is under anonimaty? Would it it be the type of person, who, now that the time is nearing; is backtracking and talking about small percentages of possibilities of Bigfoot being out there?
You see, if this old man really was so sure of where Sykes' study was going to land... He wouldn't be so concerned with having a fake avatar and name would he? He is so, so, so self absorbed and so scared of actually being wrong, that even under anonimaty, the old man can't just stick by his guns and maintain what he initially claimed are no Bigfoot, without having to contradict himself now that the time is getting close in fear of looking like a complete clown... Only someone who isn't so sure of his standing would do something like that.
So I say this... Yellow belly arss-winker... Tired old man, it is now time for you to put your money where YOUR mouth is; let's see your identity. Let's see how sure you are that you have nothing to fear from this study. Let's see that you're not just some big fake that will merely slime back into the background once this study hits you to the gut like a hog with a fire cracker up it's arss.
You are a fake and a coward, nothing more arss-winker. A contradictive old man, bitter at the subject because your bipedal gorilla didn't show and made you look silly; and you don't like looking silly do you? Perversely obsessed comes to mind.
The ball is now in your court... And I won't let this go. Yellow belly old man. I'll be waiting for your excuses.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
Two words:
DeleteGot monkey?
Three; Got monkey suit?
DeleteYep.
DeleteMonkey suits can and indeed have been made. Hard for simple minds like you to understand but yep monkey suits exist in this world.
Got "THE' monkey suit anon 6:14?
DeleteNo? Why would I? Do you have something that is the property of someone else? What an absurd question.
Delete"No? Why would I?"
Delete"Yep.
"Monkey suits can and indeed have been made. Hard for simple minds like you to understand but yep monkey suits exist in this world."
"No? Why would I? Do you have something that is the property of someone else? What an absurd question."
Anon 6:14- You contradicted yourself in less than 30 minutes.
Which is it?
First you say "Yep".Then you so "No? Why would I?"
Do you or don't you have "THE" monkey suit?
No contradictions there you jackass.
DeleteYep monkey suits exists.
No I do not have a monkey suit that someone else owns.
Get a grip.
Anon 6:14-Resorting to name calling is the first dead give away that you're frustrated and that you've burnt your Hot Pocket in the microwave.
DeleteJoe asked you,'got monkey suit',and you answered 'YEP'.
So,which is it?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!! The 'Jackass guy' looks rather the Jackass!!
DeleteHA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!
Jackass...
DeleteHi I'm Jackass... This is getting my arss getting handed to me.
HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
Love the burnt hot pocket reference!!!lol
DeleteYes. They do. Monkey Suits exist. Congratulations. You get a fucking D. No PGF suit. No suit maker. Not supportable at all anymore. If you desire credibility. If you want any sentient human to take you seriously. Choose a new angle. Or support your fucking argument you imbecile.
ReplyDeleteSo you still haven't got monkey and you still have no valid argument for why you have no monkey yet it is a stretch for you to believe that someone made the suit we see in the pgf? Wow just wow.
DeleteI have one of the leading geneticist in the world writing up his findings for publication now. Wow just wow will be your reaction when he publishes. It's no longer a ridicukous argument. We are waaay past that. For you to act shocked is funny. You know. Modern science has made many advances you might marvel at this am. I suggest you go stand, mouth agape, at your toaster.
DeleteMike, you guys are expecting too much of this study..It is not the Ketchum project where the goal is to prove bigfoots or yetis exist. He is testing anything that may have come from any hominid at anytime(presumably some of the samples are from fossils)..All we can say is that he included samples from the crypto community and those submitters believe their samples came from extant hominids...
DeleteYes! And that would be a result, would it not? And I will be using this as evidence, along with one of the biggest names in science, to promote this species.
DeletePeace.
Ok 8:03. I like that post. Well thought out and rational. Please allow me to respond. Perhaps I am. I never got on the Ketchum bandwagon. And I was around back then. I reserved judgment. Now I'm just sad for all those involved. The submitters, Wally, the public. I have a possible DNA sample. I may just chunk it in the trash. Better that than have folks bashing each other like I read the other night. I look to Sykes as the threshold Is there something to look for? If so what the hell is it? If he doesn't find novel DNA or relict DNA of a living fossil heretofore undetected I'm outta here. But I saw enough and heard enough this summer to justify seeing this through.
DeleteAnd yes we do know that. And I'm glad you brought that up. Who are the submitters? It would be great to know that wouldn't it
Delete7:41, "the suit we see in the pgf." Hmmmm, interesting.
DeleteLet's watch the whole PGF.
OK I'm done now.
I have looked all over the place in that film hundreds of times and I don't see any suit.
Do you mean a business suit? A jumpsuit? A skirt suit? A law suit?
I don't see any such suits lying around, hanging on trees, or on the ground. Most interesting.
I don't see the film subject wearing a suit, business or ape or otherwise. She's not carrying a briefcase either, or a roll of blueprints or a cup of coffee.
"The suit we see in the pgf." Hmmmm.
Since the film subject isn't wearing a suit of any sort, do you see a law suit in the PGF? Do you see a suit of armour discarded on the creek bank? An Armani suit hanging on a tree branch while the owner takes a dip?
Since there is no suit visible in the PGF, then you are mistaken on a few counts:
"The suit we see in the pgf":
1. "suit" is an error
2. "see" is an error
3. "we" is an error (who are these delusional "we" who have this fantasy?)
4: "pgf" is an error, you've got the wrong film
Yes Joe, I guess that is one possible result-that samples from the crypto crowd had primate dna that matches no known species...Good questions Mike that no one really knows the answer to. There is not much precedent for this kind of thing. As for the samples, we know about Justin's boots and that some samples came from museum collections...
DeleteSo again, it is a broad study. That is why you should not give up or leave the blog if he does not find anything in the purported crypto samples. He never said "I will find out whether or not bigfoot exists". A possible result is that he managed to extract dna from some fossil ala his denisova study..We just don't know.
Sorry about the late response guys. I had to get work..
Really, these are lifelike images of bigfoot? Based on what evidence?
ReplyDeleteI know, i does ge boring, fantasy as fact.
DeleteFantasise about your safe little world all you want... It'll require an injection of creativity soon to save it. You'll have all the evidence you require.
DeleteAnon. Keep the gangsta fact stater. It is the personality that most accurately reflects your intellect. I miss Honcho terribly At least he's witty. And I do enjoy watching he and Joe go at each other. But anyone reading this thread today will at worst pity the skeptics who serviced it and at best find their logic foolish and fundamentally flawed. I do not know whom this other individual is that defends the film and Sasquatch in general but let me just say that if any of you were half as good at attacking the film as he/she is defending it, it might level the playing field. I'll be trouncing you fools throughout the day. You guys better call Honcho or get some of your super nerds over at BFF to help the cause. As Joe says "Goebbels would have you shot in shame. "
Deletewhat happened tohoncho
Deletewhat happened tohoncho
DeleteHey MJA. I dunno. He's vanished. Hope you're doing well my brother.
Deleteyea i doing good looks like joe defeated honcho
DeleteJust for one moment can't you guy's all get together and have a big group hug?
ReplyDeleteYa, While most of ya all are crying fake this and name calling; another possible siting has happen near my town again. It may be a mythical apeman to Nature; but, I know the truth. So lie cry and be against the true cause of this site. Yes, most of you want evidance; which, is noble. The problem is these creatures hide for a reason and it is no wonder the sceptics have not seen one. Yet, I NEVER asked to witness this creature and personally it would be best that you hard core disbelievers don't see one. It would shatter your reality. You also may then have the evidance that there may just be a cover up, Nature included. I have my reasons for being anon just like you know who.
DeleteWhatever your reasons are. I respect them and thank you for sharing this.
Deletehey mike did you guys beat honcho
Deletetotally look like trolls from Scandinavian myths
ReplyDelete