World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog: Encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence and arguments.
^agreed... Salt Fork is a small area as well, he is delusional.
Parnassh*le/Timmy/Bigfoot is BS/Sharon Shill, are they back? Oh delight.
You better believe it mulder
What do you mean "WTF?" Its quite simple, bigfoot don't exist.
Anon 1:51 it's obvious from your blatant grammatical errors that your little brain couldn't grasp the possibility of an undiscovered primate.
Hahaha^ keep telling yourself that. Aint gonna make your monkey man fantasy real.
Hmmmmm, interesting. Is there any chance that this could be recognised as any other creature? Peace.
I know you're just a troll but I'll humor you. Telling myself what? That there is a possibility of the existence of bigfoot? In my opinion bigfoot has neither been proven nor disproven so that leaves us with a possibility. That means we need to at least discuss the possibility and put in the time and do the research to find out.
Anon 2:02...Sykes will make it real for you and all your little closed minded, ignorant, stupid, scared little cancerous clowns.Oh... And no monkeys, just giant hairy people. Peace.
Top, according to your logic unicorns, leprechauns, santa clause, flying spaghetti monster and a tea pot in orbit around the sun are all possibilities. Schooled.
topnotch,is that your best comment. pick up someone on their grammar on a blog.ffs,get a personality and formulate an opinionu belive in bf,good for you. is that a feeling you've got? or can you point us to proof? id sure like to see this proof. what is it thep/g film[takin by 2cowboys in every sense of the term!]eyewitness accounts-then youd have to belive in mermaids,nessie,gogman etc etc,,,as theres hundreds of eyewitness accounts to all kinds of other crazinessfootprints-ye cause they cant be hoaxed. You should you tube the guy who shows you how he does g8 footprints with dermal ridges and scar tissueHow about this convincing suatchmaster effort,another known hoaxer,hardly compelling.it could and is another animal in the forest.if you've ever caped you hear all kinds o strange animal noises.ive camped next to cows and heard some crazy noises youd never belive cows could makeill await your evidence links!!!fuckin a hole
Joe got hoaxed. And maybe even impregnated.
You cannot explain prints so you label them hoaxed as it is so easy for you to do; it masks the real obstacle you have in trying to explain them. You offer absolutely no explanation other than cynicism and what you fail to see is these footprint a are attained 40-50 miles into the interiors of wilderness areas. Explain that... Explain how a 'hoaxer' could calculate to the exact metre out of tens thousands of thousands of square acres to the exact moment a researcher is going to be there... Hoaxers? Why should we believe your bullshit point of view over professionals and experts?? You cannot explain them so you label them hoaxed as it is so easy for you to do; it masks the real obstacle you have in trying to explain them. If you are referring to the technique Sarmiento is referring to; his technique does not account for prints that have been cast over the past few decades and prior to this being aired on a notoriously skeptical Nat Geo documentary. Sarmiento is no longer a skeptic, I wonder why that is? Stamping dermals is cheap and does not account for the same complex pattern that is found consistently in a number of different tracks, attained decades apart from different part of the country.Explain footprints that are attained 40-50 miles into the interiors of wilderness areas, explain a transcribed dialect, explain 100 years of printed news media, explain ten thousand years of native culture, explain the best forensic artist in the country's enthusiasm, explain a wildlife biologist and former adviser to the UN's enthusiasm (amongst others), explain a costume and special effects expert of 30 years' enthusiasm, explain multiple person eye witnesses, explain sequenced DNA... Explain those things, without just claiming it's not there, you won't cause you can't. Here's a question for you... How about you bring me an expert that has evidence that this creature doesn't exist?I'll be waiting and I can promise you... With the sheer lack of professional analysis your theory group has invested into this subject (purely cause anyone who has, has come to the conclusion this creature is real), coupled with your apparent terrible grammar and questionable interllect... I won't be holding my breath.Now that... Is a schooling.Peace.
Anon 2:18. Good for you. You're starting to understand. The world is full of possibilities. Who knows what is going on in the multiverse inside of another multiverse. The world of quantum physics is full of possibilities and since the confirmation of the higg boson particle in march who knows what we'll discover next. Oh and I never said I believe is bigfoot just the possibility of. Open your mind troll and the world will open up to you. You should start with a basic education though. I know its not your fault mommy didn't give you the support you needed growing up but it's never to late to start.if you need a boost don't hesitate to ask I may be able to help. I won't hold it against you that you're a troll
This comment has been removed by the author.
Now that was a schooling!! Peace.
" Here's a question for you... How about you bring me an expert that has evidence that this creature doesn't exist?" Joe, that is the response of a 5 yr old. It shows a complete failure of critical thinking 101. Please try to do better.
Not really Joe. I just hate narrow minded ignorant people who spew negativity. If you don't believe in bigfoot great I respect that. I lean towards no big man myself but I'm open to discuss in an intelligent manner. For someone to come on here just to try to taunt people who believe is ridiculous in so many ways. If that's how they get off that's just plain sad and I truly feel bad for them. Oh well what can you do...
The discovery of the Higgs boson required a multi billion dollar multi national collaboration and a machine miles in circumference. All I want is one good close up photo of a bigfoot taken with a nice camera. Is that too much to ask? The tiolets the scientists at cern crap in probably cost enough to finiance a real national geographic quality expedition. J.D.
JD that's a fair question. Unfortunately for the believers of bigfoot the burden of proof is on them. I think it will take a body. People will find fault with photos or even DNA studies. With technology finally catching up with the "hunters" out there if bigfoot is real I think a body will be coming in the near future
Come on then Don... How about you show me an expert to back up your claims instead of suggesting anyone else has the critical thinking of a five year old... Didn't you run off last time before you could respond to any of my questions?Let me guess... You'll reel off about 'negatives' and call people five year olds for the next couple of hours, offer nothing to back up your claims except cynicism and the suggestion that people are mentally ill, and then her off for another couple of months? Peace.
I did not run off Joe. I told you that I don't post here very often and invited you to come join discussions at the BFF, or even better, JREF.I come here for laughs. If you think you are something because you splash around here, what is easily the very, very shallow pool of Bigfoot discussion, well I can't help you with that.Maybe it's time to step out of this quagmire and discuss this with the big boys?I don't imagine you are going to do that now are you?
Hey Don what are the other sites you mentioned? I'd love a real discussion on the matter. I'm new to this site an am quite disappointed with all the nonsense. I like when people disagree so it can lead to new things but the only thing I hear on this site is yo mama and bleevers r stoopid. Sigh...
Top Squatch, I would recommend the BFF or JREF. The BFF is a Bigfoot site so it is understandably proponent heavy. But there are skeptical voices there and decent discussion does occur. The JREF is a skeptical board. Many topics are discussed there with Bigfoot being in a small minority of topics, but there at any given time several active Bigfoot threads.
DMaker. I think you give BFF far too much credit.It's loggerheads. No more. No less. In your mind you have DWA 'pwned' to use the troll vernacular and he will think likewise.BFE was riddled with skeptic trolls posting misinformation about this subject and that problem had to be addressed.Addressed it has been.If you think that inviting someone onto the BFF is similar to asking a guy to 'step outside' then I suggest you gain a firmer grip on reality.MMG
... I'm only winding you up Don...Like we established last time, I doubt that I'll visit any other blog to be honest. I just about manage this between my social life and work circumstances, don't take myself too seriously and I have regular blogging friends here that tick all the boxes for me... Plus I really enjoy the news Shawn posts. Plus... I really don't think I'll be able to handle it with all you 'big boys' on a regular basis.Peace.
If you go to JREF, though, be prepared for heavy opposition to unfounded claims. You will not find many allies in that arena if you do not come prepared to defend claims with real evidence. The BFF, well it has no such tone. Anyone can say anything over there and some will eat it up without scrutiny, but not everyone.
But Don... I have to say, MMG's comment was right on the dot.Peace.
MMG, your point is well taken. Particularly the loggerheads comment. I have to agree. But it is miles ahead of any discussion that I have seen here. Wading through "firsts" and "your momma" are amusing to me, but does not really add anything to the debate.
Don... I do believe that denying evidence does not make no evidence. That isn't the scientific method and to deny that ten thousand years of acknowledgment warrants scientific investigation and grouping it with subjects like the paranormal for example... Is simply trying to shut something down and is not even the true 'skeptical' method either.Peace.
I never mentioned paranormal. But please tell me what exactly you think has been acknowledged for ten thousand years?
Don, just think as me and MMG as street fighting cheetahs.And as for acknowledgement, look no further than Dr Sykes... At least there is one person, with few being as significant, that are willing to ask the questions. Peace.
My point was... This subject as physical evidence that seperates it from other debates, such as the paranormal for example. Peace.
Don it's great we have someone with alternative view we can debate and discuss with. Ultimately there will be no winners or losers but we enjoy the mental gymnastics of attempting to outwit our opponents.You are correct. BFE is a low brow blog, but it's fun and light hearted and we'll do the footer and skeptard thing but no one gets hurt. Mostly.On BFF my stance is a million miles from where I am here. The habituators and the psychic squatch guys are my prime targets. Indeed We've found ourselves on the same side of the argument many times.Hope you'll drop by more often DM. Sure beats that 'your momma' shit.MMG
Don, what do you mean the "shallow pool"? You underestimate Trollandia.."I'm smart, not dumb like everyone says..Smart!! I could run things! I was passed over Mikey!!""Thats not the way Pop wanted it Fredo...."..lol.
People are willing to ask the questions Joe. Simply asking does not advance anything until the answers arrive. Look at all the people that proclaimed the Ketchum study as the end of the Bigfoot debate and the harbinger of the skeptic crow banquet. We all know what happened with that now don't we?Why don't you just wait until Sykes actually publishes something before you get all hyper over results that are not even in. You would think Footers would learn not to do that.
I'll second that... I've told you before to drop in more often Don, I enjoyed our debate last time.Peace.
I'm just saying that Footers love to double down on every new study, Daisy in a box, or Erickson, or whatever is going to prove to the world. But in the end, the house always takes the chips.
No... That's another effort of your's to lessen what I was implying and dodge the fact that science is asking the questions... I big difference. Ketchum didn't stand a chance and the way she went about herself afterwards left as many enthusiasts asking for her head as there were skeptics. You cannot get more respected and more credible than Sykes and the signs are there for it ending in favour for us. I can get all 'hyper' because I can see all the idiots on this blog get all nervous about becoming that little more creative in a few weeks time. Peace.
U guys Shure you now what your talking about? A lot of it isn't really adding up here ??????
Don great to see you over here, great posts as always.Joe I would pay good money to see you try to "school" people on the jref.
Good God, Don is recommending the JREF? It's a negative. It's an organization of skeptards founded by a skeptard. They aren't skeptics. They are skeptards; knee-jerk reject-all-at-all-costs skeptards.No one intelligent would willingly join the Jolly Rectum Enthusiast's Fellowship.To be a skeptarding JREFer is to live in a state of negativity. A philosophy of negativity. Their attempts to explain away bigfoot and other phenomenon create howling hysterical laughter.An example is a skeptarding website devoted to attempts to debunk phenomena. Repeatedly, in example after example, this person's claim of successful debunking was based on hearsay from people who claimed to be involved and "came forward" and said it was faked. This included bigfoot.This person was basing debunking on hearsay. The debunking was based on weaker evidence than the phenomenon itself was based on. As soon as any stranger "came forward" and claimed to be involved and claimed it was hoaxed, this skeptard seized on it, wrote on it, posted it, and classified it as debunked.All of this palaver about burden of proof, evidence. Frankly, the creature in the PGF is obviously "real", and is fairly obviously not a homo sapiens. Even Andre the Giant didn't quite fit Patty's proportions in the $6 Million Man. Really, the evidence is there, the evidence in the film is excellent, Hilarious and Hackham both violently flunked in tryiing to duplicate the creature, and Hackham with a BBC budget.You really hardly say more. The BBC was unable to duplicate the creature. Unable. There are reasons for that inability. The reasons are in the PGF.Hilarious' and Hackham's attempts are hilarious and the work of hacks. They are nothing close to Patty.You can distinguish the skeptards from the skeptics a mile away. The skeptards, fearing that Sykes has something, are already trying to fit the man with a tin foil cap before any results are released. They are attempting to preempt the results with propaganda and smear.A skeptic will accept the good evidence in the PGF. Rejecting the PGF is the act of a skeptard. It's a foolish act, learned in Fool School, taught in the JREF.
And I think you are confusing out and out hoaxing with researchers that have been hoaxed to the detriment of their work. Daisy in the box - that was called out by footers before any of you even knew about it.Adrian Erickson - hoaxed at an embarrassing level by land owners he trusted. Peace.
Anon 3:57...How about you try and have a pop at schooling yourself properly before acting like a teeny-bop ten year old at the presence of one of your obvious heroes. Peace.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=just-a-theory-7-misused-science-words&page=2"Simply denying mainstream science based on flimsy, invalid and too-often agenda-driven critiques of science is not skepticism at all. It is contrarianism ... or denial," Mann told LiveScience.Instead, true skeptics are open to scientific evidence and are willing to evenly assess it."All scientists should be skeptics. True skepticism is, as [Carl] Sagan described it, the 'self-correcting machinery' of science," Mann said. Peace.
Its probably easier if everyone from the JREF and BFF hang out here...You can pass around a hat and we can hire ginger to be a mod...She's a nice, pleasant looking woman....
Wha? Daisy in the box had footers befuddled from coast to coast. It was the death knell for that bigfoot chick.
You are deluded joe.You think if an actual bigfoot was put on a table a skeptic would deny it?Of course not you dumb ass.A true skeptic is skeptical of bigfoots existence due to the complete lack of verifiable evidence and because the probability of such a species existing undetected is pretty much zero.
"This person was basing debunking on hearsay."Oh, and Bigfoot is based on....? A giant pile of anecdotal evidence coupled with hoaxes upon hoaxes. Joe, I applaud your enthusiasm for the Sykes study. I'm curious, but skeptical of course. But if he delivers the goods, then so be it. I will make a prediction that you can pretty much take to the bank though. His results will not scientifically prove anything and will leave enough doubt that Footers can claim it was not a complete failure and go on believing. Sound familiar?
Well Coast to Coast AM... Though I have been known to listen in a couple of times, does tend to have some idiots hooked, but everyone in my circle could saw it a mile off and so did all the top researchers, anyone with common sense could.No... If you read my reference from a proper, logical scientific thinker... You will realise that denying evidence does not make evidence go away. There is evidence, if there wasn't then you wouldn't have institutions like Oxford and Lausanne Universities; two of the best in the world, asking the questions.Schooled.
There is a difference between denying evidence, as you put it, and examining evidence and treating it for what it is. No one denies that the reports exist. But they are simply reports. They cannot ever prove anything. That is a simple fact. They are not acceptable as scientific evidence as proof of anything, be it Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster. Next we have what has been offered as physical evidence. Footprints? So many have been proven to be fake, even after people like Meldrum and Krantz have "verified" them that they are just poisoned fruit from the same tree. They are tainted by their own history of hoaxing. And other evidence has been examined more than once. Each and every time samples come back as bear, dog, carpet, or human. That is just a simple fact. The only thing being denied is that they came from an unclassified primate.
Don...You will have mutiple person sightings, condemned by the word of one person, for example. You will have tracks attained in remote places of the planet, condemned by someone questioning the characters of the people who have attained them. Bigfoot isn't just based on hearsay, but it's hearsay that appears to keep it censored quite successfully. As for Sykes... The footers can't really lose. Sykes is as only good as his samples Don, there will be more DNA testing regardless of his results... If they continue if he posts bad news, then it'll mean pursuing 'genuine' samples, if it happens after he posts positive news; then you have your repetitive scientific evidence that scientists require for legitimacy. Peace .
History is not on Bigfoot's side here. Every time something does not pan out, and more and more time passes without a single piece of verifiable evidence, the Bigfoot hypothesis just seems more and more ridiculous.
Riiiiight. So you are saying that if Sykes posts bad news, then it is only because he wasn't given genuine Bigfoot samples? Do you understand how utterly ridiculous that sounds?? OK, maybe the next study will actually include real BF samples? Or can one safely conclude that the reason none of these studies confirm unknown primate dna is because no one is providing any because such a thing simply does not exist?
Trying to confirm the existence of Bigfoot on stories and tracks is just not going to cut it.It's time to pony up some real samples, or better yet a specimen, or just admit the whole thing is a myth.
Well I would agree with you in one respect, there have been many queries with regards to prints because of the actions of some hoaxers, yes... But it is the efforts of people to deny footprints with credible attainment that is the biggest issue we have in making the wider scientific world listen, which is dogma considering wildlife biologists conduct so much of their research on tracks. Now... To treat evidence for what it is, would be to look at many of Medrum's tracks for example and acknowledge these factors and trust the people with professional and expert opinion that attained them; would it not?Also, DNA has been sequenced. Now I understand that there are even enthusiasts that would disagree with me here, but Melba must have done something right to get the attention of Sykes, who literally wrote the book on DNA.There are existing scientists who actually consider her work believe it or not...http://bf-field-journal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/dna-study-update-david-h-swenson-phd.html?m=1There have been plenty of sequences that have determined known animals, yes... But there is now going to be a successful sequencing that mimics the results of Melba's that confirms what many new school theorists feel this creature is; a type of human. This would be in line with ten thousand years of native culture that have always considered these creatures as another tribe of humans. Peace.
" To treat evidence for what it is, would be to look at many of Medrum's tracks for example and acknowledge these factors and trust the people with professional and expert opinion that attained them; would it not?"Well, as pointed out, they have been wrong on more than one occasion in regard to prints. Joe, you seem to pin most of your argument on the Sykes study. Great. But that is not complete and the results not published. So to harp on about that really does not help anything. Why not wait until the results finally come out before you do your victory jig? Pay attention to history here, it might provide you with a baffle to your enthusiasm that may be in your best interests to heed.
Joe: "tribe" does not equal "species". Unless you are suggesting that Bigfoot is just a hairy version of Homo Sapiens Sapiens? In which case, why all the fuss? We're only talking about a tribe of hairy hobos after all...
History has not been on Bigfoot's side because for 46 years people have been looking for a gorilla that isn't there Don. It's the development of the Internet, the linking of world research groups and peolpe's experiences that mean the understanding of this creature is evolved and we in recent times have an acknowledgment in science. As science has developed, it is no closer to debunking this creature; why is that?Ha! It is really not ridiculous to suggest that Sykes is as only good as his samples. 30 samples has no baring on the coultless prints, other successfully sequenced DNA, tens of thousands of witnesses, etc, etc, over a ridiculously long period of time. Bigfoot prints stand up for what they are Don, and it's down to whether your cup is half empty of half full for credibility concerning these. Unfortunately for us, the majority of mainstream science has an agenda that means the cup isn't even used. Peace.
If Sykes is only as good as his samples, as you claim you believe, then why are you putting so much faith in the outcome? Do you have secret knowledge that all the samples are genuine?Or are you simple creating a back door for yourself when the study fails to deliver the goods?
I really don't think that Medrum being wrong on something has any baring on his entire research that spans decades. Scientists are wrong frequently and it is how they fine tune their method and evolve theory. Medrum has been exposed to such tracks and over time has not changed from his stance; why is that? When you are trying to work through people that are trying to make fake prints then it makes your job all the harder and he is no doubt learned from those experiences. I have seen Medrum on many ocassions call out mistaken prints. The number of supposed hoaxed prints he has (remember the majority of enthusiasts haven't seen these, though sketpics maintain they are there), has no baring on the countless amounts of other prints that there are with toe bending, scar tissue, complex dermals that are characteristic of a species pattern. He has samples from both Russia and the US (apparently quite a few from Russia) and these consist of nails, hair, scat... Possibly half eaten things, stuff like that. Also, it had leaked a month of two ago that he had isolated what was in his opinion 'Bigfoot/Almasti/Yeti DNA', and that he required an extension to find just one more positive sample to verify his findings...http://youtu.be/VApv_wyANuo... Fast forward to 29 minutes and check out what Ro Sahebi says about the current situation (at the time) regarding Sykes' research. Ro knows this, becuse his close friend Justine Smeja was contacted by Sykes to inform him that a sample he gave Sykes for testing (a bloody boot), yielded no positive DNA, to which Sykes then informed him of the situation. This extension, has recently been cut short with Sykes stating that the paper will be published in the next couple of weeks.I might add, that Sykes is an active member of Bigfootology, has visited two well known research sites in the last year, has had a personal 'experience' that he will not comment about yet and has had the BBC involved to make a three part documentary to document his findings.A tribe of hairy, 'very tall' hobos is fine with me!Peace.
I take your point on Meldrum and Krantz when it comes to fake prints. No one is perfect. No problem with that one. But please understand how prints as a body of evidence is not without blemish. The fact that Sykes is a member of Bigfootology is of zero importance. It's just a fancy bauble on this tale. It has no scientific bearing whatsoever. Neither does his "experience" when it comes third hand through the Internet. As I have said repeatedly, the results of his study are the only thing that matters. Not whatever Bigfoot club he has decided to join.
Don, I'm gonna call it a night I think bro... Don't be a stranger, drop in more often. If you did then the trolls would subside and people like you wouldn't have the opinion they have of the discussion content. You only have to look at how little trolling has happened since we have been talking for evidence of that.There are some of us that are quite capable of being grown ups.Goodnight Don, goodnight all.
Good night, don't let the Bigfoots bite.
And lastly, my point was to not imply that those things about Sykes were contributing to authenticity but to suggest where his intent and opinion lies.Goodnight Don.
I understood Joe. Putting intent before results, though, is not terribly scientific. That what Bill Munns does..
^BOR-ING...more taterhole less everything else please
Welcome, Don. I give PJ a lot of shit for the same reasons you do. Although, you have been more precise and refined with your verbiage. PJ goes from "Sykes is coming and your sweating" TO "Even if Sykes study yields nothing....blah blah blah." You're exactly right with everything you say. PJ, I'm sure you're a good guy and I'm sure we'd get along well over a beer or 6. But, in the end, you'll get nothing and like it, bro.YGNALI
YGNALI...I'm sure we'd get on like a house on fire, but the truth is that vulturizing on the thread of someone who is 90% more articulated that 99.9% of the skeptics around here, does mean that the points made in counter to mine hold any more weight, or yours at that.By the time Sykes comes along in a couple of weeks; you will get quite a lot, it's down to you if you like it... or not.Peace.
Missed the first, damn. I was teaching a bull how to head butt.
Me too with the sheep. Except the mother fucker kept turning around. But I do know what animal that is making that noise...Giant Crickets!!Hey Joe and co.
I resent that sir! I think the sheep was on the receiving end. Plus it was a female numb nuts. And does your mom know you talk with that fucking blowhole!
Back at joe!
Yeah, I missed it too..The headline caught the corner of my eye-slowed; me down. I thought it said "Bigfoot wails as Squatchmaster gets all Queerie"..lol..
footers really need to shun tools like squatchmaster,a known admitted hoaxer,so anything he shows is nonsense. all these films of figures in the woods[when filing beind him as he claims,yet gets the bf right in the film,a lot of times,lol]once one even knocked him over,there was leaves all ove the forest floor yet a bf walks up on his tip toes and knocks him oer and just runs away.none of which is captured on a camera that's rolling. no thunderous noise from a 60pd beast,no film of it,no growl.what a fuckin joker this tool is!his films receive hundreds,which is crap 4 the subject matter on you tube. hes a well known tbeso why hes allowed to post his usual nonsense here,which shows nothing,shows how desperate this site is for anything. the whole scene has died a death after hetchum/ericksonn debacle. it was an exciting time in the lead u to science proving bigfoot and ketchum having HD films of bigfoot theyd been'filming for years',all we got was bad science which was laughed at by her peers. the ericksonn film nonsense was themost disappointing,as it was an out and out LIE. all we got was a carpet with a pump under it. then nothing!time to move on. we need to look to the ocean for crypto finds. the universe holds nothing ,imo. ufos are nonsense too,theres nothing there,if there were beings with that technology we d have much better evidence and theyd have made obvious contact youd think by now. what are they doing playing peek a boo. showing themselves above a city for 3mins then flies off,ye right,utter shite and easily hoaxedikow im a boring prick,a troll.a least im not 'squatchmasterbater'-[see what I did there]
^^ It's just a mess. No idea what is going on here.MMG
I think he could be drunk. I would usually reel off on the probability of Erickson being hoaxed with the Matilda footage... But I'm concerend he'll do another drunken rant.Peace.
Haha yeah a mess. I feel bad for the guy...
Hahahaha footers getting pwned by some drunk guy rambling. Still makes footers look like fucking morons.
I think a lot of people agree that the oceans and seas are the best bet for finding cryptids...As for the Erickson\Ketchum let downs, red flags were flying all over the place for 2 years. Failure was no surprise if you read them. For example, Bill Munns said back in Feb 2012 that a clip associated with the Erickson doc was a fool in a Wookie mask...
Anon 2:21 so just curious does it make you feel better to spout off negative comments as you hide behind anonymity? Did you not get enough attention growing up? It's ok little guy we don't blame you
The trolls on this site are so repetitive spouting the same crap day in day joe ,mike and MMG hand their arses to them on a plate on a daily basis skeptics don't bother me I used to be one c'mon trolls get some new material.
Sorry about the poor grammar and punctuation had a couple of beers :)
Adrian Erickson was hoaxed by the land owners of his habituation area. This was after he attained a real red Bigfoot hair sample to which the land owners them gave him a hoaxed video for money. This hair was then taken to Melba to which was sequenced successfully as DNA, Melba trusting Adrian was willing to back up the footage with the DNA sample, then tarnishing the whole thing. Since then... Adrian has realised that the footage is ridiculous, realised the whole project could not be taken seriously anymore and left the field completely. Peace.
Alright my welsh friend how's tricks ? i see you've been doing plenty of schooling today.
Hey Graeme bro!! Much respect!!
Graeme buddy... It's like shooting fish in a barrel!! Peace bro.
Greetings Joe & MMG, Thanx for the comment mmg on my posting on the essential's posting yesterday. It means a lot when it comes from ones who knows how to use their intelligence wisely.I seen that mmg had comment on the Brown thermal footage. I believe it's is in the top three thermals of all times, if not first.May I suggest you visit Mr. Barackman and his extensive re-creation on this. Here's the link if interested..Thanks friends and I see mmg is going footing in Dublin. And I see MJA and friends left you some interesting tips>ha! sshttp://cliffbarackman.com/?s=Brown+thermal+footage&searchsubmit=
Steeeeeeeeeeve!!!!!How are you my friend!! I noticed your comment esrlier today; awesome to see you expressing your experience bro, it's really important and there are a lot of people who would have appreciated that comment. How are you buddy?Thanks for that link, I'll check that out straight away!!Much love bro!!
Hi SS! Hope things are starting to come together man.Not seen the Barackman recreation before so I'll save that for the weekend.Stacey's thermal footage is ace. It's all in the shin rise right? :)Stacey is also about to release an interview with a retired Florida park ranger who claims to have run over a BF. Should be interesting...Yeah tracking down that 'Paddy' squatch in the old home country! Worst troll fail EVER! Lolz!Have a good weekend SS. I'm on vacation next week so should have more time to spend on here.MMG
Looking forward to it MMG :)
Yes sir that's so right. I know this story well. at the present, I am handling the SW,Fla. investigations with the Browns and his great team(thesaquachhunters.com). Mostly Myakka, but headed out to Ft. Myers for an interesting interview. When this story(Mr.Brown'sinterview) comes out, without giving away much, I will say that it will be without controversy. He has stated already(Mr. Brown) that the Forestry Ranger will remain Anon. Due to possible repercussion of losing work related benefits . And I can surely relate working with municipalities in my past occupation .This will solely on subject credibility and like Mr. Brown and team, I surely believe from people who have to deal with credibility and honesty and Believe this story.Not since Charles Branson, has their been a Ranger to come out and speak what he believes is the truth..Once again I thank all with my recent fire problems and send love to all and you will like it! Peace always my brother joe,mmg & friends.
Love ya Steve... Been taking to Don so much that only now I'm seeing your comment. AND WHAT A COMMENT IT WAS!!! Buddy, when you speak, people listen and it is always profound!So, so pleased you have started commenting again bro.The blog was a lesser place without your input. Gonna go to bed soon, I'll drop you an email tomorrow bro. Peace my brother.
Greatly appreciated Joe.!!I think I will go plug in and make some noise that some call music!
First mutha fuckas!
Joe Fitzgerald, I believe it might also be a bear. Their sounds are not always like all the recorded sounds you can find on internet or on TV. The problem is that animals can make such a wide range of noises that it's impossible to tell what made the vocalization without seeing it or knowing it was around. As for Bigfoot making a sound? Creatures that need to hide are not going to vocalize knowing there are humans in or near their territory. Most supposed Bigfoot vocalizations can easily be attributed to something else. The only time I would think that one would vocalize is in warning. I'm not saying they do or don't vocalize. It seems to me that being intelligent enough to avoid man would make them intelligent enough to avoid man's curiosity.
Excellent, that's good enough for me... I have to rely on experience with these things cause I can't claim to know anything about wilderness sounds.Cheers, your input is very much appreciated bro.Peace.
... And 'relying on experience', I obviously meant the experience of others.Peace.
I agree with you Dave. The sound a mother raccoon makes to her kittens can almost sound like a sort of language. But when 2 raccoons fight it sounds like two huge animals going at it. Once the match is won the coon on the loosing end sounds exactly like a puppy dog getting beat whipering and whining as the winner runs it off. Sound is also changed by the nature of the woods as well trees gullys etc. It is not very often I hear a noise that does not at least sound familiar to me. J.D.
How do you answer this. Several years ago, me and 2 buddies (were all very experienced hunters and have hunted all over the U.S. Canada. we've bagged Dall sheep, brown and black bears, Moose etc). We were sheep hunting at an elevation of 6-8,000 feet high. We were being helicopter in to a remote mountain top by our guide, but at the last moment we spotted 3 nice Bulls in a very remote valley area,This area is so remote and never was explored. Even our guide never been there. No civilization around for hundreds of miles. So reluctantly our guide changed course to this valley.There was pack hard snow on the ground. It was so hard we could skate on it, making for a difficult hunt. It was so dangerous our guide wanted to turn back. But we had 3 big beautiful bulls only a couple of thousand yards away.As we got closer, we notice the snow was broken up ahead of us. When we came upon this area, their were a set of tracks that look exactly like Big foot tracks we had all seen on the internet or books.This Bigfoot was so heavy, with each step, his feet went through. It headed up a very rocky ridge, that us humans couldn't walk on without breaking a leg. But the tracks easily went further up the mountain.Now you nonbelievers (Which we all were before seeing the tracks) will say we were hoaxed! How? Who in the right mind would fake a track way where the odds are no humans would show up, and how (with a set of fake bigfoot prints could he even walk on this type of terrain, and he must of weight 800 lbs to boot! Tell me how we were punked!Write here on this blog, how this could of been done, with mature answers/arguments only!
Cool story bro...sounds like every other Bigfoot story I have ever heard...
Who says you were hoaxed? Are you an expert in primate footprints? I understand you have seen pictures on the Internet, but really that is not a very impressive factor. Even the famous yeti prints were later considered to be tracks made by a common animal that had been altered by time and melt. This comment made by the very same person who reported them in the first place.
Probably a rabbit or similar sized animal hopping along in the snow
Cynical rubbish... Anon 3:37... If you are indeed as experienced as you say you are, then I would be inclined to suggest that your story is believable. However, like Don suggested... Some Yeti tracks have been the result of the sun melting parts of known animal tracks throughout the day, Meldrum has a great example of this. Can you remember the weather that time?Peace .
joe have you listened to the audio on the other post man would like to hear your thoughts on them man;)
I'll check it out quickly before I call it a night... Thanks Graeme bro.Peace.
As we stated we are very experienced hunters, and therefore we know our animal tracks. At this treeless elevation, the only animal living up there are Sheep. sheep have hooves and weren't heavy enough to breakthrough the ice layer.And no it was not a rabbit1 the only rabbits are snowshoe hare, and they easily run over the top of 12 feet of snow.This snow was wind-packed hard, for us to break through we would have to tamp down very hard. These tracks were very distinct, like a human foot with distinct toes. Size estimated at 16' inches. Whatever walk there when he pulled his foot out, small bits of frozen snow and ice littered around each track. There was no melting effect or distortion. the small bits of frozen and snow and ice, moved easily around. they were not frozen down yet.Whatever made these tracks, made them just before landed. Other words they were a fresh set of tracks.it also walked over sharp icy rocks with ease. never jumping, but a smooth large stride.Of course we were stumped! Of course we thought about what typical animal in this region would make them. Our very experienced hunting guide of 30 years flying hunters into remote regions like this to hunt sheep, never ever saw tracks like these.After we got home from that hunt, we look up everything we could on Big foot tracks and any other animal.These were Big foot tracks we all are 100% certain! This is no mis-identification. You had to see them to believe it. Like I said before this hunt, we use to laugh, be skeptical of all those Big foot stories. Now add us to the growing list of believers. Give me an intelligent answer (and Mature) to this.Reply here please. I am not dumb enough to give out my E mail with the amount of retards on this sute.
RELAX.....it's just an Ape -
An ape with mobile meth labs in the woods!Haven't you ever been so high you just had to growl yell whoop and wail?Oh hell it's probably just me!
....Bandini ain't never been the same since going down to look for a Florida Skunk Ape that never was. What happened, man?
I don't know
Squatchmaster is a joke
Bigfoot whaling peaked in the early part of the 19th century when blubber was prized for its fuel capabilities and ability to ward off dingleberry biting flies.
All the cool 'footers are habituating. Moneymaker was the first researcher to discover habituation when he spied on Morgan way back in the 90's in Ohio.