Watch: Three Bigfoots Captured On Video By Bart Cutino


Back in January, Parabreakdown's Phil Poling was asked by Bart Cutino to do a breakdown of the thermal footage that was filmed in the Sierras last summer. Four months later, Phil blows everyone away with this incredible breakdown video:



For more info on Bart's thermal footage, visit the Sierra Site Project's website: www.sierrasiteproject.com

Comments

  1. Why not walk towards it? Throw rocks towards it? Do something! Or would that have given the game away?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt Moneymaker would have chased it down. Probably would have given it a pretty thorough sniffing as well.

      That's why he's the king and all these other guys are showing blobs to each other.

      Delete
  2. Why are these blurry blobsquatches better than any of the4 other garbage these guys expect us to swallow?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The thorough follow up investigation make these blobs taste better.

      Delete
    2. The hula hoop girl in booty shorts would go a very long way towards making me actually sit through 15 minutes of these clowns rationalizing why they're frittering their lives away.

      What's dumber than a picture of a blobsquatch? A thermal image of one.

      Delete
    3. What's dumber than a skeptard? Nothing.

      Delete
  3. My science teacher says we need more proof. She said the proof of a giant ape in the world is word of mouth and foot prints from hoaxers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tell your teacher if she gets some action maybe she will have a different view on about everything

      Delete
    2. Nuh uh man. There's a lot of proof. Bigfoot is on those beef jerky commercials. How can anyone deny that?

      Delete
  4. I just keep coming here but I never manage to get firsty. When will be my day?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When you don't have a job and you live in your parents basement

      Delete
    2. I will do it then. This is a good cause to do that.

      Delete
  5. This is so bullshit. He obviously filmed the dudes at his camp site. So fucking gay.....


    and this is from one of the "most respected" researchers? There is no bigfoot. This is all a sham.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. You're gay as they conclusively proved they couldn't be guys at the campsite because what he filmed is much taller and there's more of them? How do you account for the heights of the things as you could see the re-creations are plainly obvious? are you stupid or just lazy?

      Best investigation I've ever seen in bigfooting (good job bart and phil) and every negative comment I've seen thus far is taken apart in their videos and reports. I'm only halfway through all the stuff provided and got answers to all my questions.

      We need more investigations like this, how anyone in the world, believer or skeptic could not give a thumbs up to this effort is very telling about the kind of people this subject draws in

      J.D>

      Delete
    2. they conclusively proved f*ck all.

      still no monkey.

      Delete
    3. They are not monkeys. They are apes. Idiot.

      Delete
    4. The naive might fall for this.

      Delete
    5. jd

      if they canstand on top of logs to make themselvves taller. it surely stands to reason, even for retaded prick like u, that any man can

      show us the monkey and we will gladly believe. heat seeking footage of other campers having a laugh at the BF hunters expense is hardly proof.


      8-9ft 800pd apemen and their families in their thousands ambling about north american national parks,backyards etc undetected .mhmmmm

      wakey wakey my special friend.

      ps do u believe in nessie too. is he a pleasasaur stuck in a 13 mle by 1 mile loch. he would have to be part of a family though since hehas been reprorted for over a hundred years.


      what an eciting world

      Delete
  6. just another "project" brought to you by some dudes running a website....

    it's FB/FB all over again

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ro and the gang desperately needed their own 'sighting' to be in the club. Funny how on their very first time out ever they stumbled upon two or three of them. How convenient for everyone involved.

      Here's a question: If these people are so convinced in what they captured on thermal, why the hell are they spending so much time trying to legitimize this lousy footage and not actually there trying to get real evidence?

      Reminds me of MK Davis' M.O.

      Delete
    2. true dat true dat

      Delete
    3. wow, are you dumb

      this investigation is a homerun and I thought footage was very compelling.

      Bart has been at it for over a decade and goes hard man I was out with him in CA in 08.This wasn't his second night out it was probably his 1000th. he also had like 5-6 yrs between thermal sightings and got this one.be willing to bet you didn't even look at more than the breakdown video. some of you haters are pathetic and Bart and crew just destroyed your arguments about these being guys from camp. did you even listen to the audio for god's sake?

      god help this field.

      way to go BC! cool footage, even better investigation

      Delete
    4. Two or three of em? JESUS!

      I wonder if they heard the brush poppin' and stuff

      Delete
    5. Travis you have slightly redeemed yourself from being a bleever

      I feel there is hope for you yet

      Delete
    6. I believe bigfoot exists, I just seriously question a lot of the evidence that is presented. I guess I consider myself a skeptic about everything (aliens, ghosts, chupacabra, etc), who happens to believe in bigfoot because I've seen one.

      Delete
  7. bigfoots wearing thermal underwear in the woods discussing how they will raid the camp and make the humans their playthings. It's the squatch version of deliverance.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This, actually, is pretty exciting. Thank you for supporting real research. Whether the subjects filmed were actually "bigfoots" or not, this whole endeavor is setting the bar for how field research SHOULD be conducted. Thorough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. should be conducted?

      you mean ending up with zero evidence like all other attempts at proving a mythical creature is real

      Delete
    2. Was anyone blown away by this footage?

      The most blowing was probably done by viewers going Pfft as they were watching the video.

      Delete
  9. A question for bart:

    Why not use the same version firmware on the camera when doing the recreation so it is at the same level of focus?

    ReplyDelete
  10. A rock was in a different place to where I left it, therefore bigfoot is real derp derp

    ReplyDelete
  11. Looks like his boys from the campsite.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. true dat true dat

      Delete
    2. I've been going through their analysis report and I'm absolutely convinced these were NOT guys from their campsite. Not possible as the numbers and heights rule that out.
      I haven't ruled out people but am having a hard time with it because these guys crossed their T's and dotted their I's.

      I wasn't expecting much and feel foolish because my expectations have been exceeded and I'm not easily impressed, then again I'm not one for blurting out accusations that make me look stupid like 10:57.

      Delete
    3. They accounted for everyone in their groups whereabouts, which is necessary with thermal. What I haven't read, yet, is if they tried to rule out other people in the area: visitor logs, interviews with rangers(I guess)....

      Delete
  12. Just herd Someone in northern Ontario shot a sasqwatch and it's going on display in a small local town there this week anyone now about this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Was it a French guy that shot it I just read a article about this guy in ontario who killed a Bigfoot and has it hanging in his garage

      Delete
  13. because you are bigfoot hunters you say its bigfoot

    if you were alien hunters you would say its aliens

    it proves nothing and youll like

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hunt turkeys but I would say it was not a turkey.

      Delete
  14. If This is the one north of wawa I just got a text from a friend of mine sounds like its a monster in size can't wait to see it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd believe it, that's some wild country up there!

      Delete
  15. My guess is hoax. It is not possible for large ape/cavemen to exist and no body or bones currently.

    I also asked a local PHD. in zoology and he said..nope its a circus out there of hoaxers and suckers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, well that's just, like, his opinion, man

      Delete
    2. I can understand not being sold on bigfoots being real but the last thing this is is a hoax as if it wasn't for Bart I might've suspected that. However I was blown away by the audio, the reports and what they covered, the indep investigation, the approach. The only people throwing out hoax here are seeing what they think is ambiguous footage and caring about the work these guys did and have provided here. This is my opinion is the gold standard, maybe not best footage (though it looks good the more you watch) but of investigation.

      Personally I haven't seen better and am glad I've taken the time to loo at what these gents have provided. for free no less

      Delete
    3. Have you ever heard the word con man? Con is short for confidence. They fool you by gaining your confidence. The bigfoot world is rife with con men. Even the serial bigfoot hoaxing jackasses still fool people.

      Delete
    4. That actually is really good analysis of most of bigfootery!

      Delete
    5. Yeah, hoaxing jackasses and those who fall for their BS.

      Delete
  16. I'd say some pretty interesting evidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree and this investigation was crazy good and detailed

      so stoked to hear audio with therm footage synched

      Bartman.... first helping take down that sham with ketchum and now this.....you da MAN!!!

      Delete
  17. There is no honest or reasonable basis to declare this to be bigfoots.

    You can say you think it might be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 100% correct. A skeptic or someone who is on the fence regarding the existence of bigfoot will not be swayed by this, at all.

      Delete
  18. The only thing that this video is evidence of is that Cutino is nowhere near the serious, respectable bigfoot "witness" that I had thought.

    This is Hoveyesque in its cheesiness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don;t know if Cutino or the other guys caught this but I did...listen to the audio back at camp. I'm actually convinced he is a great witness observer by that audio they provided as as he clearly describes what he filmed very accurately to the other guys asking him left and right, right after it happened and is right on the mark by saying the footage is distant and not clear. matter of fact, he describes it to a tee.
      listen to it if you don't believe me. based on that and the investigation I give all those guys who lended a hand working on this a big A+++

      Pat L

      Delete
    2. Pat-

      I heard this to! You weren't the only one as I think it's Ro and Sanh (don't know what this Todd guy sounds like)who ask bart mutliple times about what he was filming and I'll be damned if he if bart didn't clearly describe the footage exactly like what we see. That told me alot about him and I'm blown away by this investigation. I agree with some others here that every assumption that's negative is covered in these reports and I'm reading bart's question/answer one right now as I post this.
      How anyone could say these are guys from camp, a hoax is a travesty as that audio says a lot in my humble opinion. The haters arguments are weak and these people who I assume are skeptics complain about researchers not following protocol as these ones did and the skeptics won't even read stinking reports these guys must've took a long time to write.

      Big thumbs up to barty and the boys on this one!!!

      Delete
  19. Thermal imaging is 100% useless as evidence for bigfoot. It's easier to fake than footage made with a regular camera and a costume.

    No one will be convinced by thermal images, except perhaps those who already believe that bigfoot exist.

    ReplyDelete
  20. So 3 of the most elusive animals in the world are hanging around 100 feet from a campsite for a half an hour? And a "respected" researcher knowingly brought a defective camera on an investigation? And they didnt attempt to get closer? Another BS blobsquatch. Next.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The camera defect is minor according to Bart and he explained it on the BFF pretty clearly. I agree with him as it's clear its minor when I went back in the report and the clarity wasn't that far off imo.

      Total cop out to avoid reading imo as how due do you explain the height of the bipeds he filmed? the reenactment stuff was pretty clear to me you should check it out before passing judgement and these researchers proved you wrong and worked off the assumption they weren't bigfoots by the way they did biz.
      also that guy kip wasn't part of their party only for the reenactments as the tallest guy they had there according to Lietermans report was Bart and he held the camera and would still be short by quite a bit. how do you explain that? I guess it's easier to not try.

      Delete
    2. I'm sorry, but a thermal image of an ambiguous blog will never ever convince me that bigfoot is real. I don't care if its 20 feet tall. It's far more plausible that somebody made a suit that's producing a heat signature than the idea that we are looking at a 7 foot gorilla. All thermal is worthless evidence. If you can't understand that it's no wonder you believe in magic monkeys.

      Delete
    3. I understand you're an idiot by your comments

      Delete
    4. Yup. Thermal imaging is absolutely useles when it comes to bigfoot. It should not be used. If you are trying to show evidence of bigfoot using a thermal imaging camera, you are wasting your time.

      Delete
  21. Great job guys! that biped in the treegap that crosses is pretty impressive as I've watched it repeatedly. These things do not move like people whatsoever

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think this footage is pretty incredible. The investigation is obviously first rate stuff.

    Funny I haven't seen any of the naysayers challenge the reports analysis provided by this team of researchers. I've only heard "blobsquatches," must be camp members, must be a hoax. where's the challenge to their data? why hasn't anyone attacking vid addressing flaws in the investigation? it's either a) there aren't any or b) they aren't going through the material. I think it's a little of both personally

    DanY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ummm... Multiple posts before yours do an excellent job of discrediting this footage. It's blobby thermal. I don't care if the frickin CIA did a two month follow up investigation. There is no evidence here.

      Delete
  23. Wow!

    my eyes are killing me as it was alot but just finished reading Cutino and Leitermans reports and I must say this is the best follow up I've ever seen bar none!It's about time, this is how real research is done and very refreshing to see!

    ReplyDelete
  24. From what I have seen and I trust these guys and the follow up reenactment is good, I will conclude they filmed actual bigfoots. The behavior is typical of a campsite setting.

    However the filmed subjects are nowhere close to the images that Stacy Brown was able to obtain. It just goes to show how damn difficult it it to obtain good evidence of these creatures, (if those had been bears at night we also would not be able to tell), and how lucky Stacy was.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What? They filmed actual bigfoots? They filmed actual humans.

      Delete
    2. don' think it's a matter of "trust," I think they proved it to those who bothered looking at their investigation. I don't think trust is needed anywhere from what I saw.

      Delete
  25. Did I read it right that one of these guys is the dude who supposedly shot bigfoot?! Holy shit that's funny! This guy is being harassed by these magic apes! Wow, what a bunch of horse shit.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Your style is unique compared to other people I have read stuff from.

    Thanks for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I'll just book mark this site.

    Visit my webpage - waist height ratio

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story