Munns’ Erickson Project photos are from Munns himself?


Here's the deal: The image above is a fake Bigfoot. The "Matilda" footage, however, is a video of a real Bigfoot. How do we know this? Because researchers like Dr. John Bindernagel, Dennis Pfohl and Dr. Leila Hadj-Chikh have seen the creatures with their very own eyes. Robert Lindsay explains this in a new blog post titled, Bigfoot News March 4, 2013:

I have now learned that Bill Munns photos from the EP’s Crittenden, Kentucky site were from Munns himself, not from someone else.

According to Richard Stubstad, Munns was given only one video from the Kentucky site. That was the video that the EP suspected might have been faked by the owners. Munns stated that this video was probably a fake using a “modified Wookie mask.” This video was sent around to other experts, and they also thought it might be fake. The EP decided not to use the videos in their project. However, there were 4-5 other videos from Crittenden that the EP thought were genuine. Stubstad did not think that Munns had seen any of those videos.

Therefore, it appears that Munns’ photos may well be from the video that was rejected from the project and not from the ones that were accepted.

The usual gang of morons is ranting and raving about this new evidence, saying that Munns photo is evidence that there never were any Bigfoots at Crittenden. However, evidence seems to indicate that there were indeed Bigfoots at that site.

Dennis Pfohl and Dr. Leila Hadj-Chikh lived at the site for a while as part of a study. They reportedly saw the Bigfoots there on numerous occasions and also videotaped them on multiple occasions. I understand that they also had many opportunities to kill or tranquilize the Bigfoots at this location. Both were discussed. Killing was ruled out, as the EP wanted to be a no-kill organization. Tranquilizing was also ruled out as too impractical for a variety of reasons. In addition, John Bindernagel saw either a Bigfoot or a man in a Bigfoot costume in the woods at Crittenden.

A food plate was seeded with glass shards and left out for the Bigfoots. Matilda came to eat the food and she cut her finger on the food plate. Dr. Melba Ketchum analyzed the blood from this food plate and decided that it was from a Bigfoot. The study has been called into question, but that was Melba’s determination. In addition, the EP footage of Matilda is described thus:


  • Nose similar to ours (but with larger nostrils)
  • Slightly chapped, rosy lips
  • Pink mouth, blackish tongue
  • Pointed teeth, like fangs
  • Deep set eyes that dart around and don’t blink
  • Her head is round, shaped more like ours than a gorilla’s, but her brow is much more prominent
  • She has lots of fine, flowing hair on her head (dark reddish brown) and soft short hair on her face
  • When she walks away, she moves just like the female in the Patterson Film


If the footage was hoaxed, it would have been done by the Crittenden couple, a low rent, unsophisticated couple in their late 20′s. They faked a black tongue on the Bigfoot?! No way. They faked wild, feral eyes that dart and never blink? No. They faked Patty’s walk down to the T. Nope. They faked a pink mouth? How did they do that? They faked a prominent browridge? The Wookie mask has no browridge.

The owners were running around in Bigfoot costumes the whole time hoaxing the EP and even Bindernagel? No. Forget it.



[via Robert Lindsay]

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Looney toon "habituators" involved.

      Case closed.

      Delete
    2. I'll soon be posting my great ideas for goodies to put in your easter gifting baskets...stay tuned.

      Delete
    3. The next book put out by the bigfoot community should be "The Footers Diet". It will be written by Henry May, edited by Moneymaker, with recipes from Bobo and Munns included.

      Delete
    4. First chapter: The many ways to prepare crow.

      Delete
    5. I saw a Bigfoot last week. I managed to snap a picture of him, but he was so huge, all that could be seen, was his furry chest.

      Delete
    6. Was it because you were on your knees hob knobbing the Bigfoot?

      Delete
    7. Robert Lindsay always talks fucking shit. Piss off Robert Lindsay, you've already burnt your bridges!!!

      Delete
  2. SOOOO TIRED OF THE Drama. Just release the damn videos already.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No shit. Show us the damn vids. I will pay to watch the documentary. Just release it.

      Delete
    2. The footage is junk, that's why no tv channels want to show it. If it's a great as they say they could have released it and not bothered with the nonsense DNA study.

      Footers who claim "video will never prove it" are deluded. They say this because they know damn well there is never going to be good video of a mythical creature. This is one of the ways they keep the fantasy alive.

      Delete
    3. ^ we do it just to keep morons like you coming back to waste your time on purpose - ha ha. What you missed juniors hockey game again? LMFAO!

      Delete
    4. 2:06 It annoys me that "people don't accept blobsquatches as proof" morphed into "people will never accept video". Everyone will recognize genuine footage from a credible source when they see it...

      Delete
    5. Can someone explain why the EP documentry hasn't been scooped up by national geoghrapic, animal planet, science channel, the list goes on. If this was so credible, real footage of a BF and not just all talk, the footage and the documentry would have been immediately bought up. Again, PUT UP OR SHUT UP!!!

      Delete
    6. ^ why don't you ask Erickson yourself??????

      Delete
    7. I live in the city of Detroit so there are no close places for me to go every day and have my encounters. So every encounter i have i charish as a good memory cause it could very well be my last.I have made many mistakes and have learned from them and can understand the value of a encounter with these creatures.Taking photographs is not an option i am willing to take if i value their presence with them.Recording is an option that I have done but some times it is difficult to catch them in the act. But i am working on that as well as trying to get video of interaction. they have a keen sence of their enviorerment and some how seem to know when i am around ad they do seem to be pranksters. Where they like to show domonace over me and i can understand why . Since the area that they are in is such a small track of land covered with hard wood and corn fields with lots of deer.The one thing that we have observed is that they have a nack to follow the creeks and rivers so there is some thing that that they are connected to that . There is another pattern to them that has come to light but I am not one to know that much about this.The ridges seem to be their favorite hunt and i seem to find tracks their the most .

      I like walking the forest when it rains and that is when they seem to throw things at me and i usually yell back at them .It seems like they get off on me yelling at them and keep throwing things at me. Like it is a game to them and i usually end getting frustrated and loosing the game. If I leave something unitended they will take it when i am not looking .They have taken my hiking stick ,compass and something else that has happen that was strange . when i tried to take a picture of this tree formation of an x my camera would black out and my cell phone would not work and the GPS would not work either,once i moved away from the area everything would work. Yes ,i would have the feeling of being watched . normal thing well i am not sure.very strange . Oh and when I would hunt they would come around and ruin my hunt and that would **** me off cause i would nver see a deer . In my head i would always say to them if i see you guys within range of my bow I am going to shoot. Thats when i would hear three to four knocks from different directions.Talk about being fearsom well thats what they are and i give them respect.

      Delete
    8. Oh, come on! This cut/paste from bigfoot forum is ridiculous. I bet whoever posts this crap over there is messing with BFF members' heads.
      Those dumb asses don't believe these posts are legit do they?

      Delete
    9. ^^Absolutely...there's a whole flock of these freaks. The BFF does nothing to reign them in, so apparently, it's condoned.

      Delete
    10. It's hilarious, trolls being trolled by other trolls

      Delete
    11. ^^^^I agree with you about the BFF. But there are even bigger freak idiots on this site that are never reigned in either. I am left with no where to go because of the pukes here and there.

      Delete
  3. So then why did Melba Ketchum previously call her "beautiful" and act as if this was the exact footage she saw before she made a stink about taking the images down?

    D-D-D-Damage Control.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its just Robert's public display of wishful thinking. The clip Munn's examined was to be the centerpiece. The distinct sleeping rug footage is probably just what we have seen, and the doc would have given us lame excuses why the clip ends abruptly. They ran out of film?...lol....

      Delete
    2. Melba is beautiful ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

      Delete
    3. Yes she is, And she knows how to pull of a Hoax, Well you have to give her Credit for trying .

      Delete
    4. ...and making some cash, to boot.

      Delete
    5. That looks nothing like a rug, skeptards. No shag rug has that kind of texture shown in the hair.

      Delete

    6. Ya those one they used to put in the customs Van's in the 70's looked like that.

      Delete
    7. Yeah, Anon 9:13, nobody has ever made a fake bear rug, or a fake buffalo robe, or a fake gorilla suit, or fake fur for upholstering sofas. Man, those textile manufacturers sure are silly for missing out on all that business!

      Bizarre little universe some of y'all inhabit.

      Delete
  4. Totally absurd. Why would these melon ranchers fake one monkey if they had the real magilla on 4 other vids??

    The DNA study laid an egg so show the frickin vids already! I won't pay $30 to read some jive but I would pay $30 to see the footage just so I could size it up.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Uh-huh. Because somebody, or a group of people said so?

    It doesn't matter if Melba has been sucking Bigfoot DNA straight from the hose.

    It wouldn't matter if friggin Aliens showed up and said bigfoot was real.

    It don't matter WHO or how many people say so.

    Body, or nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Witness reports and footprints won't do?

      Delete
    2. Big or small, shoot'em all!! Bring the body back with you in the pickup. if it has a rubber mask, try, try again.

      Delete
    3. What if I shoot a stump and bring it back, does that count?

      Delete
    4. Tricky Ricky has the body in las Vegas...right????

      Delete
    5. Dyer is probably just a guy who likes a good laugh.

      Delete
    6. No.
      Witness reports and footprints will NOT do because anyone can make up a story, fake a video or footprints, and regardless the statistical probabilities anyone wants to wave around like a little flag on the possibility of any small or large percentage of reports being true, it's still just circumstantial, and often subjectively interpretive, and essentially worthless.

      Until there's a body, dead or alive, bigfoot, for most, will remain a joke.
      Until there's a body, all other evidence pointing to the existence of a real animal (or whatever it is) will also remain a joke.

      When a body happens, any and all evidence in collections will then suddenly become interesting.


      Delete
    7. Gulp.....you guys cool with Wookiee's??

      Delete
    8. Hell yeah! I'd take a Wookiee to a brawl anyday! Good back-up!

      rr

      Delete
    9. Oh really, "Alix"? HIllbillies are expertly carving dermal ridges into phony feet and fooling the experts?

      Wow, thanks for that clue-in! What a relief.

      Boy you IZ smart, ain't ya?

      It sure is strange how the moment Bigfoot is BS disappears "Alix" appears.

      Hmmmm.

      Delete
    10. Who are You Druscilla Alix ?? Maybe Dr. Ketchem ?? Just Kidding, I dont think finding a Body would be what it takes. I was going to say DNA, foget That idea Lol.
      I'm trying to think how someone could fake dermal ridges.Have to ask a specail effects makeup person,
      I just find it hard to believe that no one has ever found a Body of a Bigfoot so far.

      How we my find one:

      Shot by Hunter
      Hit by Car
      Died from fall
      Died of natural causes.
      Forest Fire.
      Think of the ways other animal are found in the woods.
      And yes we have all found dead animals in the woods before. So there is a chance.(So why none so far).
      Hardcore Bigfoot people dont tell me Bigfoots bury there dead
      How many Large unknown Land Animals have been Found in the US in the Last 100 years. So what are the odds of finding a Bigfoot by accident.


      Delete
    11. omg how many hundred times are you gonna blather about people "carving dermal ridges"? Every thread on the site? It seems like it. Nobody has ever accused anybody of doing that (straw man). Dermal ridges are easily hoaxed using other techniques, so can you SHUT THE HELL UP with your "oh yeah, hoaxers spend hundreds of hours carving dermal ridges" lameass sarcasm that makes you sound like a grade-A idiot.

      Delete
    12. Who effing cares about all this circumstantial, maybe, possibly, hopefully, could be so called evidence?

      And where have I disappeared? Suck it troll.

      All the evidence matters absolutely effing ZERO, except as speculation, and fuel for mouth breathing gawkers to fill up their fantasies.

      All that 'evidence' is essentially worthless, UNTIL a Species Type is pulled either limp and bloody, or kicking and screaming from the forest as undeniable unambiguous proof for the existence of the animal (or whatever it is).

      Only then do your precious dermal ridges, scat collections, and fur balls gain potential value.

      Do I need to write this in crayon for some people to understand it?

      Body, dead or alive, or nothing.

      Delete
  6. No credibility the bigfoot community is nothing but a big stinking brown stain!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There a kind of people. Gift them often, I do.

      Delete
    2. Skeptards are a kind of people, apparently. A dim, slow-witted, mentally-gradually-dawning constantly bewildered kind of people.

      Delete
  7. So their story is: "Well they faked one video but we're sure that the other videos (which we're not going to show you) are the real deal."

    Riiiiiiiight.

    I'll believe it when I see it but I'm not going to get my hopes up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is the thing I don't get. It has been said that this couple had created one fake video; if that is the case then the remaining videos lose all credibilty as far as I am concerned. I would love for bigfoot to be real, but right now this field is losing all credibility. You have a video that is not a blob squatch and rivals the PGF film, then just show it for God sake. Like many said, I'll pay $30 to see that.

      Delete
    2. What may have happened is that everything the homeowners gave them is hoaxed. Then when the project failed to get any genuine footage, participants created the rug hoax. The wookie stills look older and the pancake video was out before...

      Delete
    3. Don't hold out hope for the pancake video, it's the worst of them all.

      Delete
    4. It doesn't make sense that in one line the homeowners are low rent and unsophisticated so they couldn't hoax the black tongue and the walk yet at the beginning he said they may have hoaxed and modified he wookie mask.

      Delete
    5. There is a Native American woman on YouTube that says that these guys are not always good. I believe her. With this level of intelligence, individual behavior is likely to be more varied based upon thier past personal experiences as well as natural demeanor. Whenever possible, I try to be with the wife and shorties when ever they are out after dark. I doubt very much, our nocternal neighbors here would hurt them, but some things you just can't risk. Who knows, some strangers may travel through that are not friendly toward us.

      Delete
  8. If those images aren't from an Erickson video then why did Ketchum say she had to remove them from her Facebook page because they were copyrighted to Erickson?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because the bigfoot community us hemorrhaging and they are getting desperate to keep the lemmings strung on the line.

      Delete
    2. Aren't you Footers getting tired of nothing but talk? I use to be a Footer and after the last 6 months I have finally called BS on all this talk, pay for evidence, hoaxes and no show. I'm just flat out done with this crap!

      Delete
    3. No, the die-hard footers will hang on forever.

      Delete
    4. i would agree with 5.07 sentiments exatly. there is simpply no proof and all this hoaxes and lies . then reportedly cad sxcience in Ketchum paper etc etc you do think exactly what is it i believe in here

      a pattersson film thats 50 years old and a plethary of hoaxes and blobsquatches ever since

      Its quite clear there is no such creature. Its a myth

      Delete
    5. Me too 5:07, if not for the internet age, many more people would believe in BF's existence. The internet has taught me that it all seems very unlikely that bigfoot exists. I went from 90% believer, down to 10% in about 1 year.

      Delete
    6. ^^On the Jenny Craig Bigfoot diet.

      Delete
    7. The age of the PGF doesn't account for anything, 5:56. The individual in the film is not a myth. Spend some time studying the stabilized versions of the footage, and you'll find some evidence.

      Delete
    8. ^ I love the condescension that if you don't bleeve in BF you mustn't have done your homework and studied the PGF closely enough. I studied it and saw diaper butt. Now what?

      Delete
    9. ^ I read enough about the players and circumstances to conclude a bigfoot showman by the name of Roger Patterson hoaxed some footage and entertained people with it in movie theaters. No one entered or left thinking it was real, but they probably had fun and got a kick out of Roger...

      Delete
  9. Still looks like a modified Wookie costume to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Still looks like facepalm to me.

      Delete
    2. The Kentucky "Bigfoots" in the EP film are %100 fake.

      Delete
    3. As are all other "Bigfoots"

      Delete
  10. textbookFooting(string[] evidence) {
    if (evidence = 'nothing') {
    System.out.println ('you'll like it')
    }
    }

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ..lol...is that a C function?

      Delete
    2. Textbook skeptardism is atheistic approach:

      Avoid and Ignore

      Ignore and Avoid

      Deny

      Deny

      Skepticism is agnostic approach

      Skeptards are atheistic fundamentalist extremists.

      Skeptards are not skeptical.

      Gobbling up spoonfed panda DNA does not demonstrate skepticism, but gullibility.

      Delete
  11. Of course they're a no kill orginization. If the were pro kill, the debate would be over. By being no kill, they can perpetrate the hoax like other no kill orginizations out there.

    ReplyDelete
  12. hope this is true.what i dont understand is why Munns is inviting people to take court ction if he is wriong! why did he do that!

    That isnt the action of someone who is faking themselves! Maybe is a huge bluff but its a dangerous one to do

    I do hope the erickson project film prove to show what is claimed.I am,what many on here,call a skeptic,yeti want to be wrong and for bogfoot to be real

    lets hope ericksons' film shows are real livingf nimal/type of human. It would be the most amazing thing in my lifetime

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True? Footers will hang on to any little bit of hope they can find, no matter how unreliable the source.

      Delete
    2. ^ ahh no. Stop speaking for Footers skeptard! You try to keep the dream alive that we believe everything. Keep living in your fantasy world Tard!

      Delete
    3. ^^No gifting basket for you!

      Delete
  13. Replies
    1. I have been known to go to town on a lamp except when the lamp light bulb gets really hot I have to hop off.
      Squatch Nuts
      Furniture Lover

      Delete
  14. I agree if the footage was worth anything, a major network would have bought it, promoted it, sold shit loads of advertising, and the EP whatever they were asking. This is effectively Plan D for these people. - lepomis M.S. Environmental Biology

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ye,surely thats true,the owners of a video containing a bigfoot would surely be able to sell it to any major TV company in the world,CCNN,BBC,SKY etc etc...would all be falling over themselves to get the rights to what would be the biggest stroyy ffor decades,maybe even ever, you have to ask why thuis isnt happening.the only place I hear of this film is on Bigfoot relaqted sites which doesnt fill u with confidence

      Lets hope we are wrong and they simply want to do it right,protect the animal, maybe even are the process of doing this[hence the hold up in showing it and giving us a 4sec teaser]. You can be sure every TV editor in the world is aware of this .Its down to credibility. if they see it and it shows no signs of a hoax etc...passes all the right tests ,then it would be worldwide news for months
      we'll see

      Delete
  15. These videos will never see the light of day because they're all fake. I would imagine the only reason EP still has his website up is to save face in his home town.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "a low rent, unsophisticated couple"....well that's one way to say thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A low rent, unsophisticated couple who managed to milk Erickson and fool Bindernagle!

      Delete
    2. heh, Timbergiant couldn't fool Bindernagel, but these guys could...go figure...

      Delete
  17. George Knapp has just announced that David Paulides will be on his Coast to Coast Program on March 17 for the entire four hours discussing his "Missing 411" books. David has stated that there will be a major announcement during the show!! Mark your calendars!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yawn. No one cares what Paulides has to say. He's got about as much credibility as does Dyer.

      Delete
    2. When will he be on c2c to discuss the Melba's great bigfoot discovery. He's been promoting it for years, seems like he'd be dying to talk about this monumental achievement.

      Delete
    3. He was doing research years befor he met the cat vet. If you read his 4 books you'll find out what he's done.

      Delete
    4. ^^After he got fired from the police department?

      Delete
    5. A few commentators seem to be reading me as “anti-this-or-that,” or “pro-such-and-such.” But most of the time, I am merely an observer and chronicler, trying to share insights along this journey.

      Delete
    6. Has Mr.Paulides changed his view on the ridiculous "Bluff Creek Massacre" theory? I have to question the judgement, if not the credibility, of any researcher who thinks the theory may be correct.

      Delete
    7. I like to picture Bigfoot as a figure skater. He wears like a white outfit, and He does interpretive ice dances of my life's journey.

      Delete
  18. Just about had it with all this. So little integrity around this whole subject now. It's all 'look at me and my latest announcement.'

    It is embarrassing and the ratio of anything substantial to hype is an embarrassment.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anything is possible, if you believe and have faith.

      Delete
    2. Welcome to 50 years ago bro. Nothing has changed and nothing will. This is exactly what happens when promoting mythical creatures.

      Delete
    3. I agree with Anon 5:45.
      It seems to be getting worse every day

      I cant even trust the so called experts anymore.

      Delete
    4. Anon 5:57

      Your exactly right! All this BS is only for the promotion of a myth. The myth itself has become big money and makes an easy living for those promoting it. In almost 50yrs there has been no substantial evidence, peoples stories, foot prints and blurry video and photos don't account for anything substantia. ln the last 200 plus years the forested lands of North America have had millions upon millions of acears cleared for housing, business and farm lands, yet nothing had been found that would let a normal person conclued there was any kind of 9ft 800lb primate living here, past or pressent.

      Delete
    5. Go and reproduce the PGF and creature exactly, with 1967 technology, and then come back and gripe. Until then, eat your gigantic bowl of shut up, 8:25, 5:57.

      We will be waiting 50 years for you to do that, and you will fail.

      Delete
    6. No one has to reproduce anything. All anyone ask is just produce a video of BF that is clear and not a rubber mask. The BF community has had near 50yrs to get a video and nothing but hoaxes. Yes, you will be waiting another 50yrs and still have nothing.

      Have fun footards

      Delete
    7. We dont even have anything as good As the PGF film to date

      Delete
    8. I started this particular thread. Ironically I do think there is Bigfoot around etc bla bla bla not even worth debating any longer.

      However, there is also the bigfoot BS by the ton. Now, today after having seen this video on this website I have simply had enough and have lost interest in the subject.

      And this website is simply part of the Bigfoot B.S. So little humility, so little credibility just 'look at me with my latest announcement' trying to seek attention, trying to be famous

      Delete
  19. one big mess and who knows what is true. Id think it will finish dossapointingly for us who want there to be a real creature in the EP films. If one was faked[the Munns one] then all have to be in question surely.If they were living in a 'Habituation site' where 'they saw them on numerouse occassions' as well as being able to waljk up to 1 meter of a sleeping one. why would they need to fake anything.

    the wholle thing is typical of footery,in thatits never balck in white,they were either at a real bigfot site and living vreatures were there or they wernt! So to fake even 1 strikes me as one huge red flag!

    another hoax on its way! Why the hold up is te other obvious question!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^Go read some BFRO reports. That will bring you back to where you need to be.

      Delete
    2. ok, 5:58 I will try, my faith in this subject is fading by the hour

      Delete
    3. 5:52,you said it all and i agree with you 100%. Thank you.And i'm a so-called 'believer'.

      Delete
  20. Hi got here a little Late, This things just gets going and going.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Dianetics, buy it read it use it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C'mon now, these people are crazy enough already.

      Delete
    2. My god drives a spaceship.

      Delete
    3. My neighbor drivers a volvo

      Delete
  22. I guess one wy to solve this is to follow the Money.
    Money is the root of all Hoaxes.
    As long as there is a stage the Act goes on and on.
    As you all know this is not only in the Bigfoot world, its also in the UFO world ect.
    As I get older, I finding out there is just nothing there at all. So I just have fun with it.

    The internet is this new stage to make it all possible.
    How did this stuff happen before the Internet?
    Newspapers I guess, There was a filter throw the news.
    I think the problem is there are no filters anymore
    Good or Bad evidence just gets out there.
    No one is saying this evidence is junk lets not put out there.So there maybe somthing good, but we cant tell anymore becuase its mixed in with the junk.

    Does that make sense??




    ReplyDelete
  23. Dr. John Bindernagel, Dennis Pfohl and Dr. Leila Hadj-Chikh have seen the creatures with their very own eyes. Hmm a coulpe of Docters have seen it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And they're shouting it from the mountain tops, right?

      Delete
  24. (Ken) When real proof,you know the kind that can't be debated by anyone, comes out all this becomes fodder for the fields. Until then, this is all there is to discuss. I think Matilda isn't even a good Hoax. Much better suits exist and are being shown almost daily. She's a worn out rug, go back to sleep Matilda, forever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bottom line: Still no proof, just talk.

      Delete
    2. a body Ken, a body. Your correct, all this is about people trying to stay relevant until something real peaks it's head out so to speak. I hope some regular Joe finds a body beside a public hwy, or in his backyard and makes a mill. All these so called experts would eat each other's asses to become part of it. That would be the show, watching them kill each other to become the first friend of Joe's lol. Good to see you on again Brother Ken, keep on keeping on.

      Delete
    3. hey ken, no Grand child yet? I hope all is ok. The bigfoot thing is got it's share of jokes, but I'm a fence straddler too. Maybe someday brother, someday. Good hunting my country friend,lol

      Delete
    4. Anon 7:39,



      Who is Ken? I don't see anyone here going by that name here.

      Delete
  25. Hi Ken,

    Yes you are correct, we take the good along with the Bad.
    Matilda seems to be the Bait Hoax to keep us interested.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (Ken) yea, it's something to keep people thinking about the big guy. I'm ready for something that is so cool, we all have to set up and think. I like the skeptics, they keep it honest, and hell, most of the things they say is spot on. I'm kinda on the fence, but I want to believe.

      Delete
    2. (Ken) Got to go check on the Daughter, have a great one guys, hope something comes out for you all to argue about, ha ha. I shall talk to you all later friends.

      Delete
    3. Bigfoot is total bullshit, but that's the nicest guy ever, I wish he was my Grand father. Only a low life from hell would screw with him. Good luck BROTHER KEN, My COUNTRY FRIEND.

      Delete
  26. Yes, lets all listen to the pedophile ...

    when do the necrophiliacs get to weigh in?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yes Anon 8:27

    I'm Still not happy about the Lindsay pedophile thing,
    Was waiting to bring that topic up again ,
    Yet his name is still being be mentioned and still getting attention. That just confirms for me that anyone can and will come along and say take a look at this and all the Hardcore believers will fall all over themselves to get there next Bigfoot fix.
    Wow is all I can say

    ReplyDelete
  28. yES BITCHES i AM FIRSTY.



    1STTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

    ReplyDelete
  29. Shaun Evidence makes sense for once.

    ReplyDelete
  30. "Dr. Melba Ketchum analyzed the blood from this food plate and decided that it was from a Bigfoot."

    lol yeah she decided alright. Not a scientific conclusion, but a decision.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I like the conclusions: 'They' said it looked fake, based on the pictures.
    Where is the Wookiee mask used?
    Who made the Wookiee mask--backwoods Yokels?
    Why fake a video when you have other videos that are deemed real? This would call into question your money train.
    Show me the monkey mask!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. This article is pure horseshit.....Ketchum has already stated that Matilda was beautiful when she released those images. This entire article is nothing but an obvious lie made in a weak ass attempt at damage control. Morons, you'll see, I WILL have the last laugh, just WATCH.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course its horse shit. If it wasnt Erickson would already be a famous man. Its total horse shit and I agree, nothing but damage control. The only trouble is, this is blatantly obvious to those with an IQ above room temperature.

      Delete
  33. Meldrum was shown these supposed "real" videos and said at the time that they looked very familiar. When he saw the Munns breakdown it dawned on him that what he was looking at was Chewbacca. -- dew177

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story