‪Watch: The Bigfoot Report - Melba Ketchum finally releases long awaited DNA Study


Melba Ketchum announces that she has proven the Bigfoot species through her DNA study, "Novel North American Hominins" published in the DeNovo Scientific Journal. Is this what we've been waiting for?

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. I will review thoroughly and be back to bash her and you believers later today.

      There is NO WAY that Sasquatch exists no way.....

      Delete
    2. Fake picture of melba next to the fake PGF to accompany the fake DNA study.

      Delete
    3. Shut up and quit your whining! ^

      Delete
    4. Shut up and show me the monkey! ^

      Delete
    5. Hey Shaun, anon3:59 said a real bad word, what about it?

      Delete
    6. Everything in life is fake. NOTHING is real. Even im a hoax. Shit, i think im disap-

      Delete
    7. Bigfoot is BS, if the data is solid and her and the TEN other co-authors are right, I want you to come back and help us weed through the HUGE flood of videos and pictures that will come in.

      All the people who didn't release pics and such out of fear of being called crazy, can do it freely. So we need people who are on both sides to sort out the junk from the good. You have a good, although very closed, mind. Hopefully your eyes are good too.

      Delete
    8. The paper is up to "buy now". I bet Mulder buys it.

      Delete
    9. @Big Jim: IF it turns out that Melba's study/paper/methods are sound, and accepted by the rest of the scientific community in general, I will be back to apologize profusely to members of this board. However for obvious reasons I have my doubts, and for the moment she is just another George Adamski.

      Will Jeff Meldrum or Todd Disotell or Bryan Sykes back her up? We'll see...until then its no different than Dyer, Smeja, etc.

      Delete
    10. So all you have to do is make a claim, then make up a scientific journal and post it. Now I know what to do with my unicorn study!!!!!!

      Delete
    11. Bigfoot is BS, I don't care about an apology. There will be a mass exodus of skeptics from the sites if the paper is verified. If we have hundreds or thousands of vids, pics, calls, etc only be looked at by us believers, too many bad ones will be accepted as real.

      We need people of both sides to sort them. There will be some who stay, but most won't. I want as many intelligent ones as possible. Like Mark UK, you, rumfer, and others. Hopefully Timmy returns too. Maybe Stank Ape.

      Everyone seems to miss the fact that now that her data is out, it does not matter where it was published. It will be tested, challenged, poked and prodded. If it is solid, she wins. Period. Game over.

      The data will sink or swim. Any other studies will be icing on the cake if her's and co-writers is solid.

      Delete
    12. I can't believe that Bigfoot came down to the barn last night and braided my horses hair.

      Delete
    13. Some of the guys here will wait for Meldrum, Sykes and the entire scientific COMMUNITY to back her up before they make up THEIR mind and accept the results.
      Well that illustrates perfectly how science works - it has nothing to do with anything you do and the way you do it, it's only about the politics.
      Yet they never wait for no one to spit on somebody's work.

      Delete
    14. I couldn't pass peer review so I'll invent a new journal.

      Delete
    15. Is Peer Review what makes science real?
      If so then why do people against ID say it doesn't.
      I agree with Big Jim.
      She put it out. People want to read it and then analyze her science they are more than able to do it.
      CMcmillan

      Delete
    16. Holy Hybrid Humans, Batman!

      Delete
    17. 7:51

      Bat shit crazy lady alert!
      Do not respond to her or you will be sorry.

      Oops, I'm sorry already!

      Delete
    18. Hold on here, Bigfoot is BS just referenced Meldrum as a respectable scientist. Since when did Bigfoot is BS ever acknowledge that? Never!

      Bigfoot is BS is backpeddling like crazy on her invisible bicycle which she bleeves in.

      Anon 4:10, there is plenty of good evidence in the PGF. Try studying it instead of commenting on it.

      Big Jim Jr I wish you were right about the paper sinking or swimming according to the science, but that won't occur. Instead, we will be barraged by The Dueling Experts, with interested people stuck between the duelists.

      This always happens in every controversy, The Dueling Experts Syndrome. Some will be paid to attack, others will have other motives. There will be endless attacks no matter how solid her methods were in testing. It will go on and on.

      The only method to pick your way through the attacks and insults of the the dueling experts is to become as expert as you can in the subject and study the results and methods on your own, and decide for yourself. Eventually you will see which of the dueling experts is lying.

      Mark my words.

      Delete
    19. Arla here - I have translated the DNA paper into Bigfoot language. I'm sending it out to all bigfoots, by way of mindspeak.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Real or fake, I still hope that a bunch of smelly bikers take a communal dump in your retarded gifting basket.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. LONG LIVE MUCKLEGRUNT!!!
      LONG LIVE PooP IN A JAR GUY!!!
      LONG LIVE BIGFOOT EVIDENCE!!!

      Delete
    2. You forgot Long live Anonymous.

      Delete
  4. Ok Melva, looks like you did it. Just what you did I'm not sure about YET,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't believe my business has a Grade "F" with the BBB.

      Delete
    2. ^ get your story right before you bring up that crap about the BBB.

      Delete
    3. The fat lady is singing her heart out.



      But she's off key and the lyrics make no sense.



      Delete
  5. what about the erickson film now?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just checked out their site and can't find reference to the article, or any article. It appears to be a brand new "science journal".

    http://www.denovojournal.com/#

    Gerry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually look a little more. It's been around for awhile. It's not new . Many other things published.

      Delete
    2. No dumb ass that's not true. this is the first edition first volume. lol. Ketchum started her own journal to bypass scrutiny from the established scientists.

      Delete
    3. The DeNovo website was set up on February 4, 2013. This is self-publishing, while trying to look like a peer-reviewed journal. The paper couldn't pass peer review, so she set up this pretend journal to try to fool stupid footers.

      Delete
    4. It has nothing to do with peer review anymore. She is throwing her data in everyones face and saying "prove us wrong". The data will be the pivot point. Either they prove her wrong or she owns them and rockets to top.

      Delete
    5. Remember that she must provide samples for independent study.

      Delete
    6. Actually it is on her, to prove she is right. She is the one making fantastic claims based on work that has been rejected by other journals and scientist. This self publishing is nothing more than her trying to cover up the fact that she has wasted everyone’s time and money.

      She must prove her facts, not the other way around! And I’m sure her results and conclusions will be found lacking greatly by many scientific sources once she puts it out.

      Just another endless circle of debate and deceit created by a questionable character in a questionable field.

      Delete
    7. Big Jim that's not how how the real scientific community operates. You don't get to say whatever you want and then publish it in a fake journal. Imagine what would happen to people doing research in say cancer studies or birth defects. Or even individuals doing research in engineering. We have checks and balances for a very very good reason.

      Delete
    8. Didn't Cutino and Huggins already proove her wrong?

      Delete
    9. And guess who is DeNovo's editor? That's right. Robin Lynne Forestpeople.

      Delete
    10. I can't believe I get to commune with a family of 5 Bigfoots on a routine basis.

      Delete
    11. Take a look at these three articles on peer reviews. You will be very surprised as people are tired of long peer reviews and egos. The second is very good.

      http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/07/11/scholarly-publishing-broken-guerrilla-self-publishing/

      http://m.guardiannews.com/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science

      http://www.genomesunzipped.org/2011/07/why-publish-science-in-peer-reviewed-journals.php

      Delete
    12. It is not up to her anymore. Her data is now there for anyone to see. Or test. I don't know about the samples being availible for testing but if her stuff is solid, proven by others, and still solid, then it is up to the rest dispute it or accept it. I am sure some samples will be availible to big name studies.

      Delete
    13. Cutino and Higgins attempted to cast doubt on the study by producing a fraudulent parallel study that was alleged to have used the same samples. The fraud could either have been with Smeja, with Cutino and Higgins, with the Canadian lab, or with MM in perhaps giving instructions to falsify results. Take your choice and provide the evidence on your own.

      Delete
    14. She is not the only author. Some of those are very reputable. Take your blinders off. A couple of those other authors would not associate with this unless it was on the up and up.

      I'm glad it's out there. Everyone is forgetting all the blind studies that came back with the same results.

      She would have had much better luck getting it published in another country. Other countries know a lot more about what's going on here in the USA than we do.

      I'm glad it's out there now where's Sykes results? Sykes and his supporters where's his results?

      Delete
    15. Big Jim Those were good articles on peer review and getting journals to publish. It's ridiculous. Thanks for the links.

      Delete
    16. Da nada. They kept me busy looking for stuff while waiting for more to release.

      Delete
    17. When's the press conference? Bwaaaaahahaaaaaaaa!

      Delete
    18. Right before Dick Ryders press conference.

      Delete
    19. Bart cutino and Tyler did nosuch thing. They vetted the sierras sample and then released the results. Ive heard they did this because Ketchum told Smeja point blank to destroy his sample in turn making him believe she was fraudulent. If true they deserve praise for moving on that information in my opinion

      Delete
    20. Yes Big Jim Jr, I've been saying for months that this peer review process (how I loathe the term) is corrupt.

      All of these science people are on their knees in deference to Peer Review.

      Christ it's corrupt. Get off of your knees and wake up.

      Delete
    21. Scientists-BAD!
      Pseudoscientists-gooood.

      Delete
  7. She said "buckle up" because you all are going to get takin for a ride again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wake up people there's still a few seats left on the Dyer train, at least it's going somewhere=straight to a bigfoot body, yea.

      Delete
    2. Wow. Another announcement! She is not going to release any paper, and there is no study. That the people still believe her, or that idiot Lindsay, is simply astonishing.

      This is a great hoax, and am very impressed.

      Delete
    3. Umn, the paper is out. That is all the uproar. Have you not had any coffee yet? Eyes and brain not fully in connection yet? I know it takes me a little to get going in the morning.

      Delete
    4. The data is beautiful and amazing. I've seen it with my own two eyes.

      Delete
  8. Actually the paper was peer reviewed and published in Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in Zoology Jan 11, 2013. It was a peer reviewed journal.

    ReplyDelete
  9. embargo lifted now on http://www.denovojournal.com......

    ReplyDelete
  10. Replies
    1. If you order now, you'll also receive a copy of the classic Bigfoot habituation book: Enoch.

      Delete
  11. These are interesting

    Sasquatchgenomeproject.org

    Melbaketchum.org

    ReplyDelete
  12. This was timed to coincide with New York Fashion Week. Can't wait to see her line of Squatchwear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I want underwear that says, "I think there is a squatch in these woods" on the front and "it smells squatchy" on the rear.

      Delete
    2. I've got atramp stamp that says 'Entry only,no exit'.

      Delete
  13. Yada yada yada! Patterson save us all!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Makes perfect sense to me. Its not a valid scientific study so it's not necessary to have a valid scientific journal!

    ReplyDelete
  15. buckle up is right- we are away on another fanatasy ride. the very fact she couldnt get an established journel to reiew it is enugh for me to know its utter nonsense . Making your own jpurnal so itcan at least be seen so all those years and thousands of dollars dont seem completely wasted. utr sham,mythical apeman will remain that, A MYTH!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lest us not forget the long list of KNOW IT ALLS, who confidently predicted that the DNA Study was not only a hoax, but that it will never pass peer review and never be published in scientific journal. Starting out with Matt Moneymaker, Bart Cutino, and various Team Tazer representatives.

      Delete
    2. The study could easily still be a hoax, and it didn't pass peer-review and it's not published in a scientific journal. It's published in a journal of Melba's own creation, with Forestpeople being the editor.

      Delete
    3. It's self-published, bye a self-reviewed, self-owned, online made-up journal.

      I better get ready for my bowl of crow soup.

      Delete
  16. '13 could finally be the year of the squatch!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Who is going to buy it for $30, WTF is the video?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can think of at least 3 people that will buy it.

      Delete
  18. The paper is now there if you want to pay $30 for it! Really?!

    ReplyDelete
  19. http://www.denovojournal.com/#!special-issue/crrc

    Click Buy Now LOL

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hello.

    I will be submitting my manuscript proving the existance of Manbearpig to Denovo Scientific Journal soon. I have sequenced the dna genome of manbearpig and discovered he is in fact another human hybrid. Half man, half bear, and half pig.

    I have gathered multiple samples from the field over the course of 10 years. I will not tell you how I got them because I know children read this blog. The results are amazing and absolutely TERRIFYING!

    This will be without a doubt the BIGGEST news story of the MILLENIUM! Super DUPER serial.

    Once I have finally proven manbearpigs existance to all the skeptarded bureaucrats in Washington they will have no choice but to give me the unlimited funding I need to once and for all rid the world of the single biggest threat to mankind.

    Then everyone will say "Thank you AlGore! You are SUPER awesome!"

    The End

    EXCELSIOR!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Al you need to cut down on the fried foods.

      Delete
    2. But what about the Crab People?

      Delete
    3. Excellent EXCELSIOR!

      This is a coincidence, because I too have a paper. I recently finished a five year study, where I sequenced the DNA from 100 different Lizard man samples. My data is amazing and beautiful and I will also be publishing in this wonderful new journal. I have no doubt that my paper will pass review.

      Delete
    4. Al,how's it going with Tipper?

      Delete
    5. DAMN YOU MANBEARPIG! You leave Tipper out of this! Shawn can you please send me the IP adress of 7:27? I need to investigate something...

      7:13- How DARE you refer to Tipper in that way! That is a serial medical condition!

      6:39- If Tipper couldn't keep me from the foods I love what chance do you think you have?

      Thank you.

      EXCELSIOR!

      Delete
    6. Slow your roll Al. Tipper and I have been in cahoots against you since you had your encounter with me in the woods. Actually she was with me that eventful day. Man,what a time we had. Rolling around in the dirt and then you had to mess things up by walking by when we were in the throes of Man Bear Pig on Human Female love. We were going to invite you for a threesome but you ran off hollering and screaming and I quote "Man Bear Pig,Man Bear Pig,someone shoot him". After that blatant show of someone that is scared of his own shadow,Tipper and I continued with our beast love snickering the whole time. You Sir are a fat bastard with the intent of wanting to kill anything you don't comprehend, Mister 'I invented the www'. So just go back to eating your Ding Dongs and please leave Tipper and I alone............ Man Bear Pig

      Delete
    7. Lies lies lies.
      Yeah right. The man who singlehandedly killed Manbearpig is a loser.

      Delete
  21. It passed peer review. Her latest post.

    Melba Ketchum 6 minutes ago ·

    It has been a long and tedious battle to prove that Sasquatch exists. We have had the proof for nearly 5 years but building enough data to convince mainstream science has taken a lot of time. Trying to publish has taken almost two years. It seems mainstream science just can’t seem to tolerate something controversial, especially from a group of primarily forensic scientists and not “famous academians” aligned with large universities, even though most of our sequencing and analysis was performed at just such facilities. We encountered the worst scientific bias in the peer review process in recent history. I am calling it the “Galileo Effect”. Several journals wouldn’t even read our manuscript when we sent them a pre-submission inquiry. Another one leaked our peer reviews. We were even mocked by one reviewer in his peer review. We did finally pass peer review with a relatively new journal. It took a fresh outlook on the part of the editors and their careful selection of reviewers with knowledge of next generation whole genome sequencing in order to pass. I have no idea who the reviewers were though I have the reviews. That was kept confidential as is the way journals handle peer reviews. That was only part of the delay and problems associated with publication though. After this journal agreed to publish the manuscript, their legal counsel advised them not to publish a manuscript on such a controversial subject as it would destroy the editors’ reputations (as it has already done to mine). I have documentation on all of this drama. So, rather than spend another five years just trying to find a journal to publish and hoping that decent, open minded reviewers would be chosen, we acquired the rights to this journal and renamed it so we would not lose the passing peer reviews that are expected by the public and the scientific community. Denovo, the new journal is aimed at offering not only more choices and better service to scientists wanting to submit a manuscript, but also reviewers and editors that will be fair, unlike the treatment we have received. We furthermore have adhered to all of the standards set here in the link below, especially since the entire review and agreement to publish was done at the previous journal: http://publicationethics.org/case/editor-author-ow n-journal

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pseudoscience speaks for itself.

      Delete
    2. Dude, they self released it. so dumb = bleevers.

      Delete
    3. If you just ignore that one little thing, the science is good.

      Delete
    4. Good work Big Jim Jr. I am glad you are doing the digging, I just do not have the time for it. I also appreciate the post you have made concerning this and the other non biased bloggers that line up with you and there are many, I have come to find out. I have read many good posts since this broke and I guess there have been others that have not been caught up in the trash talk frenzy the past couple of years, but instead have taken my position of patience and see what is in the journal and let that stand on its own. We now know of the other DNA doctors and institutions that have signed on and I hope they will speak soon as to what the findings mean.

      I am also glad Dr. Ketchum has started to speak about the past five year process and it lines up with what I had thought all along. I never believed the main stream journals would ever look at her work for the obvious reasons and have stated that in the past. Some form of self publishing would have to be done and she had the guts and determination to do it, instead of just giving up when most of the deck was stacked against her. I also understand what George Knapp was talking about in his Dec. 2012 article. Academia can be a harsh foe when you go against the grain. Dr. Bindernagle and myself had a talk about this last spring and his frustration too is self evident.

      You are right in that it is now out there for the scientific and layman world to read. I will not understand the DNA jargon and few will so we will need help in understanding it.

      Get ready for the ride. One way or other it will be awesome.

      Chuck

      Delete
    5. Is it any wonder that my mind's on fire?

      Delete
    6. I really have to find a way to make money off these fools like Melba, Shawn, Ricky Boy, etc have been doing. They are just begging for it.

      Delete
  22. It is now up to main stream to disprove her. I said this all night. She has co-authors, a peer review and apparently proof of being shot down. She is calling out main stream and saying "SUCK THIS".

    Now main stream will have to prove her wrong or nut up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! Now the work is out there to be scrutinized and built upon. Now the basis of the science has been started and I'm sure there will opinions and changes, but we finally have a firm start of something bigger ! Great Work Melba and contributors . Thanks for getting the ball rolling and doing the hard work! Now let the scientific and intellectual community build on this!

      Delete
    2. Lol. She is playing right into the mulderesque conspiracy fantasies hands. Your buying it hook line and sinker.

      Delete
    3. She is full of crap and the reason her paper wasn’t published by a real journal is because it was full of sketchy procedures and conclusions. Ask yourself, why a main stream journal or scientist would not want to be part of something this fantastic? The notoriety and money is tempting enough for anyone. The problem lies with the lack of repeatable and provable procedures and conclusions. She will continue to make excuses as will all of her gullible supports as to why (real science) won’t accept her paper as fact.

      Bottom line she is a known liar and cheat!

      BTW it cost 30 dollars just to read the paper!

      Delete
    4. ^ I would believe a group of accredited people over your Lame commentary ! What background do you have Anon 7:12 or knowledge to call Their work crap moron? Degree in couch patato? Shut up!

      Delete
    5. Bearfoots will rip your face off.

      Delete
    6. Or the mainstream can just ignore it all together, forever. The idea that now everyone is going to run and try and disprove her data is ridiculous. We are talking about Bigfoot, I don't know how long most of you have been separated from the real world but nobody out there cares about Bigfoot.

      Scientist are not going to "take this on" and try and disprove Ketchum's claims. Not only do they not care but they are not going to risk their reputations.

      If I were a scientist I can just imagine hanging with my other science buddies, discussing our latest work and I have to tell them that I'm working on disproving Bigfoot. Yeah, I'm sure my parents would be proud.

      Delete
    7. 7:42
      The laws of common sense, logic and human nature tell me that she is full of crap. If her work and conclusions were solid, she would not have to set up a journal so she could be her own publisher.

      BTW, the work I do along with my peers (scientist, PHD’s and Engineers) is very technical and we have had several papers published over the past ten years pertaining to our projects. So I know more about the peer review / publishing process than most.

      Degree in Engineering with 25 years experince, thank you very much.

      Delete
    8. I disagree. I believe the kooky old hag will get called out on her BS.

      Delete
    9. Anon 7:53 the reason I know your full of crap yourself is because another scientist who has a reputation wouldn't call others work crap without reviewing it first! You reference papers you have had published so what are they? Where can I review them?

      Delete
  23. Did she include any DNA samples on Robert Lindsay? I, for one, am interested in what species he is.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Another post by her.
    Dr. Melba Ketchum 2 minutes ago ·

    To get an idea of bias, the Lesula monkey paper in PLOS One used 6800 bases of DNA sequence to prove it was a new primate. We have aligned 2.7 million bases of nuclear DNA on two of the three Sasquatch genomes in this first manuscript and generated a phylogenetic tree to prove it. We also had 20 whole mitochondrial genomes at 16,500 bases each. That same publication wouldn't even send ours out for peer review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She should stick to identifying cats.

      Delete
    2. There you go. So many in the science academia world are very aware of this sort of thing!

      Delete
    3. Big Jim,
      Just shut the F@#$ up already. You are truly biased towards this liar and con artist and you have provided no value as to why she self published.

      Her work, procedure and conclusions are crap. No other excuse will work.

      Posting her excuses, makes you look as stupid as she is!.

      Delete
    4. I put three links from three different sites up explaining how the peer review process is flawed. That was before her statement which I also posted. Go back up, read the links, then read her statements and tell me they don't match. Then google why self publish science papers instead of peer review and click a few of the dozens that pop up.

      Then either go pay her site to download the data or wait until main stream starts putting out their response.

      If her data is flawed, it will come out. If it is not flawed, it will be accepted. Simple as that.

      Prove her data wrong or wait for main stream to respond. That is what I am doing. Waiting for their response now. I have a feeling many people will be buying prepperation H by the case from being butt hurt. Will it be me? Or you?

      Delete
    5. The Mothman paper will be released next week at this exciting new journal. To be continued indeedy.

      Delete
    6. Bear spray don't hurt Bigfoots.

      Delete
    7. Big Jim, if this study is ground breaking and true why is she carging $30. Surely if it was credible the interviews, book deal, guest speaker deal woild be rolling in. She is hoping to cash in on people who believe her.

      If there were no flaws or bs in this study her peers would be all over this. Its a monumental discovery.

      Imagine a Scientist discovering how to cure cancer and charging $49.99 to read it. Such BS.

      Delete
    8. The bleebers are the only ones she can bilk money from, sane people don't care or even know that her paper exists.

      Delete
    9. She's feeding the gullible with the Lesula example -- big difference when you start with a real body.

      Delete
    10. Broski, I wondered the same thing. What I learned is that it is very common to charge access fees to self published papers. It is the only way many universities and scholars have to recover costs accrued during the process. I google searched alot of stuff last night. My poor head is full.

      Like I keep saying. The data is there, now someone needs to prove it wrong. If they can.

      Delete
    11. Cancer is curable. Big Pharma and the medical monopoly plus the criminal FDA (which has Big Pharma executives on their decision making board-fox guarding the hen house) suppress it because they are making colossal profits from cancer drugs. Most people die from the chemo/radiation, not the cancer. Doctors who have found something that works are ridiculed and harassed, even arrested. Watch "Burzynski" and "Cancer:The Forbidden Cures" to understand what is really going on, as well as how science and the FDA are bought and paid for. This is why you hear how something like Vitamin C, cranberries, Vitamin D3 or similar things may kill cancer cells and be an exciting new breakthrough. Then it just fades away. That's because pharma won't pay for the trials if it's cheap and can't be patented. Therefore, the FDA will never approve anything other than expensive drugs which kill the patient along with the cancer.

      Delete
    12. bigfoots_broski,

      Many science Journals charge Yearly and Monthly fees to read the Journals.
      This is not uncommon.
      Even a person who discovered the cure for cancer would have it in a Journal you would need to pay for.

      Delete
    13. Anon 8:57. Don't forget the new findings on tumeric as an effective cancer fighter also.

      Chuck

      Delete
  25. If she acquired the rights to this journal, then why does its website look so primitive? But yes, it is now up to others to get to the bottom of this and figure out the real story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Real scientists are mean, so I made my own journal.

      Delete
    2. With a new editor named Robin Forestpeople, you can be sure they'll hang some cute curtains and amazing wallpaper very soon.

      Delete
  26. In fact, if she "acquired the rights" to that journal, then what was its previous name? THAT should be easy enough to check.

    And HOW did she "acquire the rights" to that journal? Would not the journal itself put up a fight? Or its publishing parent organization?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Her publicist (blueberry bagel) is the journal editor.


      I can't stop laughing.

      Delete
    2. She bought "journal of advanced multidisciplinary exploration in zoology" and turned it into DeNovo

      Delete
    3. Call me Desdinova, eternal light. These gravely digs of mine, will surely prove a sight.

      Delete
    4. And don't forget my dog, fixed and consequent.

      Delete
  27. I get confused with these Bigfoot scientists. Is she the one who said Bigfoots hang out on her property and one even had sex with her or something?

    I mean, they're in her back yard, palling around with her horses, having sex with her and she can't get 1 single video to back this up?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually some of that was her spokesperson, Robin Lynne Forestpeople.

      http://www.thecryptocrew.com/2012/09/hairy-friends-in-backyard.html

      Delete
    2. She's cuckoo for cocoa puffs.

      Delete
  28. Has anyone heard from Sally Here? I hope she's ok.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sally here - I'm fine and thanks for your concern. Melba and I have settled our disagreements and we're now on good terms.

      I'm at an undisclosed location with the family of five nipplejimmies and we are anxiously awaiting the release of the paper. They can't read though, so I invited Arla to explain to them what the paper means.

      Delete
    2. And so with the publication of the Ketchum DNA Study , THE GREAT ANTI-BIGFOOT DNA PROPOGANDA PROJECT has been unleashed. After having spent years in the planning phase, hundreds of anonymous and closed minded individuals are now implimenting a unified attack on a broad front, whose mission statement is to discredit and destroy the Ketchum DNA Study. Sit back and just be entertained by these clowns.

      Delete
    3. They are just jealous that Melba has her own journal and that she is not biased, like the science community that hates her for showing the truth.

      Delete
    4. Have a friend that saw touched and did measurements, as hard as it is to believe, Dyer has a body of an animal like no other. Large biped HAIRY AND HUMAN LOOKING. The tent video bigfoot. believe, don't believe, whatever. the reason Ketchum ran to publish now after all this time, She also knows the person that saw the body. He said to me, the hell that Allen took made him think. He said it's coming out soon enough without the grief, but he said he swore it's real on the lives of his family. He told Ketchum the same last week.

      Delete
    5. "He said it's coming out soon enough without the grief, but he said he swore it's real on the lives of his family."

      The funny thing about that is Musky has no family.So again another lie by Musky.

      Delete
    6. PS. Just do a Zaba search on Allen Issleb if you don't believe.
      People are blind sheep if they believe anything that comes from the Dick Ryder fiasco..........

      Delete
    7. Anon8:29, I don't know Musky.I'm talking about another individual who saw this thing prior to Mr allen's visit.There have been others by all reflection, to whom special invitation to view were both extended and accepted. The Allen backlash put most of these people in fear of the same banishment. What would you do?No money for a person to proclaim it real, nothing but the honor of being one of the first to disclose someone else's discovery and share in the trash party, but be forgotten in the glory.

      Delete
    8. It's true you guys. I've been saying it for months now. Dyer bagged a squatch!

      Delete
  29. This is why I said a body will be needed. A paper is out. There is data to review. So what are the skeptics doing? Trashing everything. But not a one of them has read the paper or tried to prove her wrong. It is wrong because it is wrong. That is what these morons are saying.

    How about you read the data and either prove her wrong or, SORRY SHAWN, shut your dumb ass up and wait for a response from main stream? Simple as that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey chubs, you need to remove your blinders.

      Delete
    2. Fat boy is mad because Mebla paper cost 30 dollars and would cut into his donut fund.

      Delete
    3. Ken: not funny but laughable, several years ago deep core under sea drilling was thought to be safe from massive blowouts due the pressure per square inch liquid volume hypothesis. Now that was the main stream Idea for all Engineers when drilling first started in this deep recess of the ocean floor. We found out how that turned out now didn't we. You can't say what is impossible based on just theory, even if it's a good theory.

      Delete
    4. Is that how they discovered mermaids?

      Delete
  30. and by released... they mean self released....


    or better yet


    Put up for sale to the rubes...

    ReplyDelete
  31. Matilda breathing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khHSX3ZYaKI&feature=youtu.be

    ReplyDelete
  32. Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
    Domain Name: DENOVOJOURNAL.COM
    Created on: 04-Feb-13
    Expires on: 04-Feb-14
    Last Updated on: 04-Feb-13

    8 days old, yeah real journal, okay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's why I think it's legit. The journal has a shortstanding reputation of solid science.

      Delete
  33. On Facebook she said "The high def video is in the supplemental part of the manuscript."

    Has anyone seen it? Has this vid found its way to youtube yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khHSX3ZYaKI&feature=youtu.be

      Delete
  34. Ken: Hey Big Jim, you and I both know that the body is the only thing that will Force anything to happen on this or any other subject that the mainstream themselves have not yet explained. I would hate to see one in the woods with a gun in hand. The frustration of knowing a thing but unable to prove a thing has to be overwhelming. I'm glad I've not yet seen such an animal. She is either right wrong based on lack of forced interest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ken: add to: As bad as this might sound to some, I hope Rick Dyer has Killed one now.

      Delete
    2. When are we going on that Bigfoot expedition? Man, I am stoked and ready to go.

      Delete
    3. Ken: hey there friend, If your a real searcher, My advice is get to the woods now. Why wait for me? My deal will happen in a few months, I'm just waiting on other's schedule to empty. I wouldn't wait if I had the choice, so go man go and I will wish you all the luck friend.

      Delete
    4. I want to go in the woods with you.
      This is the only way I can learn, from a seasoned Bigfoot expert.
      Please take me on the expedition, I want to learn. I promise not to ask too many questions.

      Delete
    5. Ken: Oh, I see friend. Sorry no seasoned experts here, just people who enjoy something new and the outdoors. But that Rick Dyer is looking for people to go with him all the time, he's advertising and promising to teach all he know's. He's the number one guy in the field,just listen to him say it, "I'm the world's greatest", good luck hooking up with him friend.

      Delete
  35. Re-posting this comment, thanks whoever wrote it.


    Anonymous
    Wednesday, February 13, 2013 at 5:35:00 AM PST

    Actually it is on her, to prove she is right. She is the one making fantastic claims based on work that has been rejected by other journals and scientist. This self publishing is nothing more than her trying to cover up the fact that she has wasted everyone’s time and money.

    She must prove her facts, not the other way around! And I’m sure her results and conclusions will be found lacking greatly by many scientific sources once she puts it out.

    Just another endless circle of debate and deceit created by a questionable character in a questionable field.



    ReplyDelete
  36. I don't know if another bi-pedal hominid exists,(a body will prove that),but I do know that schizophrenia and confabulation exist
    .. sadly it seems this poor woman is suffering from a horrible mental disorder, we should take pity.pathological lies and fantasy sometimes make the best stories! SHE IS A GENIOUS ARTIST!!!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Just saw the HD video, it's the real deal. HaHa. I actually think the realization that they've been duped is settling into the BFF crowd.

    ReplyDelete
  38. The only way she can redeem herself at this point is to allow all scientist who inquire to get a copy of the data to verify it. Obviously, she is not in this for the science. She rushed to try to out-do all the BF news coming out.

    ReplyDelete
  39. My cup is finally raised and I toast you Melba...Ha.!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The biggest Bigfoot scam ever, very well done.

      Delete
    2. And she'll get at least 10 years out of this being interviewed on every crazy Bigfoot show on cable.

      Delete
  40. Scoftics have gone full retard today. They accept the objectivity and reliability of scientific institutions as uncritically as fundamentalist Christians accept the virgin birth and resurrection of Christ. But any human institution must be examined critically, else one has just placed it on a religious pedestal. Human bias is not out of the question as a potential explanation of Ketchum's experiences in trying to get her paper published. And guess what, she could just as easily be full of it, but putting your fingers in your ears and screaming "if this was real science would have already looked at it blah blah blah blah" is not a scientific attitude. And that's the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are absolutely right. I'm ignoring your totally rational logic and for that, I am sorry.

      Delete
  41. The gullibility here is just staggering. She bought a respected medical journal and then changed its name??? Do you realize how moronic this sounds???

    I hope everyone here who believes this crap buys her scam for $30 and a couple extras for family and friends. You deserve it and Melba deserves it. What a huckster!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't a respected medical journal, it hadn't ever published anything. She bought it because she passed peer review but they were too scared to publish.

      Still not buying it for $30

      Delete
  42. If she was able to provide clear and concise data along with samples to other reputable labs with no bias in what she presented, then she would not and you would not be defending her now.

    Her procedures and biased conclusions are the reason no one wanted any part of this paper, it has nothing to do with the fact that she identified an unknown hominid, commonly referred to as Bigfoot.

    She is a hack and it shows!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The skeptards said for years that the paper would not be released. In whatever form, it is
      released today. To that extent, on that point at least, the skeptards and the king and queen
      of Skeptardia and the Monarch of the Morons and the high-ranking supertards are all having
      crow for breakfast, lunch, and dinner on Feb. 13, 2013. They can eat it with a fork and
      spoon.

      That includes Timmy, Parnassus, Bigfoot is BS, and the other aliases.

      The skeptards are backpeddling like crazy today on their invisible bicycles.

      Delete
  43. I started out a 90% wanna-be believer back in the Fall and Melba turned it right around to about 10%. I don't have the years invested that some here do so maybe it's easier.

    I honestly think that she never submitted a paper. She could not personally handle the rejection.

    That's consistent with the shell game we've seen unfold.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, the 'peer review process' is fraught with the pea and shell game.

      Delete
    2. She probably can test samples, but the science is not the testing, the science is what the results mean. That's why we won't see a scientific paper. What we will see is a summary of her DNA results, which without any solid science are just DNA anomalies. Her "abstract" identifies her samples as bigfoot, with a lick of how she connects her results with the thing seen walking in the woods.

      She can't write a paper, but I the guys at Oxford will be able to interpret the results. And it won't just be a 63 page testing summary, it will be all of the science.

      That's why I can't come to this looney tunes website anymore. The are just asylum keepers.

      Delete
  44. The skeptics are realy pissed that melba made them her bitches.lol Thousands of witnesses ..Just sayin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thousands of people in mental hospitals too. What's your point?

      Delete
  45. What is it about "Authors" that you people don't get. There are other authors. Look them up. Look at where they work. One is/has been with MIT. They would not allow their names to be added to fake and crap.

    Oh I forgot that would require reading more than the idiocy posted here. Sorry about that forgot where I was, the stench has reminded me I'm here in the sewer.

    ReplyDelete
  46. What are the idiots going to say when Sykes comes up with the same DNA findings?

    ReplyDelete
  47. I wonder how many foolish footers will purchase this nonsense. If you do, you're literally supporting this kind of crap in the future.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story