Sometimes, the trolls here can provide good laughs
Say what you want about some of our trolls here, but sometimes they can be as funny as heck. Check out these hilarious comments copied from the "Sasquatch Hand Print and Language Captured In Canada" thread.
"When filling your gifting basket, put some candy and cookies in there for the little foots, they like treats too."
"Sasquatch don't have dental care remember! Don't give them sweets and cookies."
"Death by tooth decay is a very slow and painful death.."
"A little treat once in a while, isn't going to hurt the Sasquatooties (that's what I call the little ones). They're so cute."
"I just gift fresh fruit in my habitation area. The forest people don't even leave the apple core lol! They love melons also!"
"If they lived in the US, Obama care should cover that for them."
What's a troll? Watch below:
guess who shawn..
ReplyDeleteLower case guy?
DeleteHow true
DeleteRummyforlife, Hairless Pantini do you see yourselves in this troll. You guys are lowlife scum along with you other trolls.
Get lost
Yeah once again says the anon pussy listen bitch keep runnin your mouth
DeleteEven my wife called you a pussy and that's sad considering she don't swear.
DeleteI just had a tuna fish sandwich. Tastes like Bandinis mother.
DeleteOh really so you know what dead white woman tastes like I'm sorry you're a necrophilliac
DeleteLike I said keep postin anon we can all see the real pussy in the room
DeleteAt least you follow my posts,I shall strive even harder to be nothing like you
DeleteWow Harry,see the power of words,they're still upset.Okay,I shall henceforth advocate no further violence against the person of Rick Dyer,furthermore anyone plotting to sucker punch him in the mouth I would beseech you not to,furthermore if I should happen upon Rick Dyer I will personally punch him in the mouth,but thats JUST me and I do not reccomend this action from anyone or endorse it.
DeleteDeal.
DeleteLike Jim said karma will get him I seen enough episodes of wives with knives on i.d.
DeleteCat shit jay?
ReplyDeleteYa know what? That name is getting old. If you are gonna give me a name call me Loudmouth Jay like the other guy so that I seem to still have a shred of credibility.
DeleteGay Jay.
DeleteJust ignore them or play into it. They will stop before too long. Ask how they know the pet name their mom has for you or such. Those who post here know you are just being trolled and it does nothing to your credibility.
DeleteThanks Big Jim. Yeah, I'm getting tired of their name calling and racist comments and such. Sometimes I do laugh when they post something funny, but I could do without the attacks that are directed at people like you and me.
Deletethey do it just to antagonize you into arguments. Most of us like your posts catpoohjay. LOL I couldn't resist, sorry.
DeleteThanks. I appreciate you not swearing, at least :). It makes you sound much more intelligent.
DeleteGay Jay go give Big Jim a Big BJ
DeleteI sprayed on this site a few weeks ago like a cat so I would remember to come back. I like trolling here! By the just to let you fag clowns know Henry May is the best shot you queers have! He is currently squatching the shit out of his mother's house which is more than you guys do. What do you guys do? NOTHING! A bunch of lazy rats,
ReplyDeleteI do however have some respect for Shaun since he got STAFF a while back - only two ways you can get staff...
1. In Jail
2.Blogging day & night
I doubt this kids be arrested so Koodoos
You can also get STAPH from the YMCA. Be sure to bring your OWN towel and NEVER share it.
DeleteYou wanna get high?
Henry May do this
DeleteAnd Henry May do that
But you can be sure Henry will overeat
The guy is large is what I'm saying
Shaun do you number your grandmas? Your Asian so I think you know what I'm talking about! Grandma #1 Grandma#2 etc.
ReplyDeletei hope u take the tme to explin it to the rest of us.or just me! youvehave either een really witty and showing cutting edge humour or the usual footer nonsensial BS. i thinks its the latter but please explain the joke
DeleteI grew up in the Bay Area and know a lot of Asians, I grew up playing with them as a kid. Yeah it sounds dumb but its true, a lot of them would refer to their grandmas as #1 & #2 and so fourth. It's funny in a way but I'm not makeing this up! By the way...Henry May Bitches!
DeleteI've been calling Henry out for quite some time now and have gotten no response! I am beginning to think he is not so tough after all. LET'S DO THIS BRO!!!
DeleteSo now you promote the stupidity of the trolls? Shawn, all this will do is make more of them post crap. Are the hits really worth it? You have lost sight of bigfoot through the haze of troll funk.
ReplyDeleteAnd likely will lose even more decent posters to their own blogs or other blogs set up by former posters here. I hope you know what you are doing, because I see the death of your blog before the end of this year at this rate.
Good luck Shawn.
P.S. don't forget to visit www.bigjimblog.com
DeleteNot mine. I don't want one right now either. Too much to maintain it and weed out stuff.
DeleteOh man, you have GOT to google bigjimblog.com it will automatically search for bigbumblog instead. Just the few images that showed up on the search results cracked me up.
DeleteJim,you're trolling.
DeleteOn this topic? A little. The website? Not at all. I was curious if there was an actual bigjimblog.com. So I googled it. GoDaddy has it as open I guess but google showed results for bigbumsblog.com instead. The images it previewed were too funny, but adults only. I didn't click on them out of fear my phone would crack.
DeleteI gotcha Jim.But sometimes I like the trolls for the humor content.
DeleteI do too. But there is a time and place for it. Or in this case, time and BLOG for it. Shawn puts up enough crap posts like this one to keep the trolls happy. But in others there is no need for it all. Most of us are tired of them too. They can troll up all the Phil breakdowns, CoT, Rambo Jim, and other posts as much as they like.
DeleteIf an actual bigfoot topic is posted, video, photo, sighting etc, let's stick to debating it. The trolls could chime in but at least tie in the topic. Seeing taterholes pooping jars all the time is dull. Work it into the topic at least. Put some effort into it.
This site was pretty good awhile back. We had great discussions and lots of zingers too. But now it is like a fifth graders wet dream now.
Without a happy ending.
Oh come on fat Jim, don't take yourself so seriously, no one else does. Eat another box of doughnuts.
DeleteYou haven't been reading my posts much. I am off donuts but hooked on gravy now. I did eat a few cookies today though. Raspberry filled soft oatmeal cookies. Only 12 in a pack so I had six. They are not very big but went good with my tea and crangrape juice for breakfast.
DeleteOMG! When Big Jim Jr. Speaks like nobody cares! Wow I bet Shawn read your post several times.. So much to think about...so much to consider, but on the other hand who really cares about what Big Gay Fucken Fat Fucken Lazy Jim Jr. Thinks? He's a worthless tiny penus face!
ReplyDeleteBig Jim Hahahaha, your such an obese fat gay fuck!
See? This is what I mean Shawn.
DeleteTrolling, identity, and anonymityEarly incidents of trolling were considered to be the same as flaming, but this has changed with modern usage by the news media to refer to the creation of any content that targets another person. The Internet dictionary NetLingo suggests there are four grades of trolling: playtime trolling, tactical trolling, strategic trolling, and domination trolling. [14] The relationship between trolling and flaming was observed in open-access forums in California, on a series of modem-linked computers in the 1970s, like CommuniTree which when accessed by high school teenagers became a ground for trashing and abuse. [15] Some psychologists have suggested that flaming would be caused by deindividuation or decreased self-evaluation: the anonymity of online postings would lead to disinhibition amongst individuals [16]
DeleteOthers have suggested that although flaming and trolling is often unpleasant, it may be a form of normative behavior that expresses the social identity of a certain user group [17][18] According to Tom Postmes, a professor of social and organisational psychology at the universities of Exeter, England, and Groningen, The Netherlands, and the author of Individuality and the Group, who has studied online behavior for 20 years, "Trolls aspire to violence, to the level of trouble they can cause in an environment. They want it to kick off. They want to promote antipathetic emotions of disgust and outrage, which morbidly gives them a sense of pleasure." [15]
In academic literature, the practice of trolling was first documented by Judith Donath (1999). Donath's paper outlines the ambiguity of identity in a disembodied "virtual community" such as Usenet:
“ In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter. [19]
Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:
“ Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they – and the troll – understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group. Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling – where the rate of deception is high – many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation. [19]
Susan Herring and colleagues in "Searching for Safety Online: Managing 'Trolling' in a Feminist Forum" point out the difficulty inherent in monitoring trolling and maintaining freedom of speech in online communities: "harassment often arises in spaces known for their freedom, lack of censure, and experimental nature". [20] Free speech may lead to tolerance of trolling behavior, complicating the members' efforts to maintain an open, yet supportive discussion area, especially for sensitive topics such as race, gender, and sexuality.
The more you know!
DeleteSHUT THE FUCK UP JIM!!!!
DeletePull the stick structure out of your ass and LIGHTEN UP! Some of us like to laugh.
Hey, I like to laugh too. But limit it to posts like this one. Or use better wording in other posts. There is plenty of room on this blog for everyone. Shawn puts up enough crap like this post to let everyone troll a bit.
DeleteBut not every single topic he puts up needs trashing. Try picking a good argument and have some fun that way. If you want to toss gay slurs, racism etc, go to sites about it.
You did pretty good with the stick structure joke. You tied in the site's main theme and used it just right in your joke. I actually laughed.
Now tie it in with a good debate over the next blobsquatch and you are getting some where.
I'm with you big Jim! This site is tough to have a good debate. Lots of immature potty talk that has nothing to do with anything. I have to laugh at grown adults who act like children that wouldn't talk like that on Facebook . Although I was on FB/FB and I'm pretty sure I know a couple of trolls there post here too because they use original words used on both sites. Sad part about it a few have profile pics of them holding their children and they are dropping F bombs and talking crude. Bad example as parents !
Delete+1000000
Delete"This site is tough to have a good debate."
DeleteThen go over to BFF, there are plenty of kooks to debate with. You don't have to worry about trolls over there either, the mods will protect your delusional writings.
@anon7:22
DeleteCouldn't agree more!
It's true. My homies over at the bff will put a stop to any kind of logical thought.
DeleteWe know bigfoot is bullshit, but have the toe the bleevers line.
I'll third that. This site keeps us up to date on the hilarity that is bigfoot.
DeleteGo to any of the other sites where you can have your intellectual conversations about bigfoot. Lol. I couldn't even type that without laughing.
Big Jim why would you care about Bigfoot when your such a fat lazy good for nothing gay fat obese fuck? What are you going to do? Drive your car to the top of a hill and get out and roll down the hill in hope that a Sasquatch might get caught in one of your many fat wrinkles? Please fat ass! Maybe you can start your own blog site and kick out all the trolls &.then try to use big fancy gay words like other gayrods so you can pretend to be intelligent! Fuck I even lost my grove there when I remembers the word gayrod. Hahaha big Jim Gayrod Jr.
ReplyDeleteAnd another "illerjiterate" troll.
DeleteI have read you posts Jim, what's worse than a troll is a guy who thinks he's intelligent, your average if that... You should think about the things you state here or anyware! You are always so quick to give advice. Why don't you look around you and tell us why your advice is worth listening to? Look around you.
DeleteWow, good one Jim! I bet your real exciting to hang out with! Your so super smart & creative! My god your mother must be so pround of you! Hey why don't you apologize to your mom for eating like 3 times what the normal human eats and by her something to eat! Ding Dongs don't count either fat ass.
DeleteOk, I look around and see my bedroom. The tv is on, my wife is sleeping next to me in our bed, our two dogs are sleeping on the floor. I see what looks like a normal bedroom in a normal house.
DeleteMy advice is this then. I am not quick to give it. I like bigfoot so I comment on blog posts I find interesting. I usually say what I see in the blog. If it is fake, hoax, interesting etc. I try to provide a fairly unbiased view from a believer stand point.
But lately I have seen a decent blog overrun by trash. Since I am not afraid to get dirty, I wade in. There are some trolls here who would make great people to have a fun debate with. But they need just a little direction so they can see how much more fun it is to argue a point than to troll.
So I give them a little advice. That is about the limit of my advice giving. The rest is my observations and opinions. I try to support my statements with facts or links easily verified. You should know that if you read my posts.
As for intelligence, I am well beyond average. If you knew me personally, like some here, you would know I speak true.
So why should you listen to my advice? You shouldn't. You should make up your own mind and do your own research on things. Then post what you see or can explain. If you can't quite do that, then I would give you some advice. You should learn as you grow up. Part of that learning can be hard.
So where I am so quick to give advice? Not saying what I see in a post and such, where I actually give advice. To anyone other than Jay and Bigfoot is BS. Jay is growing and learning fine. BS I think can become a very good skeptic debater if she just tweaks a few things instead of trying to get a laugh out of hurting others.
WHAT ABOUT ME BIG JIM?!
DeleteALL CAPS
YOU ARE TOO HARD TO FIGURE OUT YET. YOU ALSO HAVE TOO MANY COPY CATS AND DOPPLEGANGERS.
DeleteNO SHIT!! LOL BOY ITS HARD BEING ME!!
DeleteALL CAPS
I feel ya. Just not physically, sorry. ;)
DeleteI always like your posts Jim.
DeleteEspecially about the Elbe trackway.
DeleteSpot on motherfucker!
You must have missed my both feet comment to Bigfoot is BS.
Deleteif this trolling bothers you bigjim, why not stick to the members forum? Too boring?
DeleteThe members forum is mostly believers. You can't have a good debate if both are on same side.
DeleteFuck Big "Gayrod" Jim Jr. Why don't you go dumpster diving food for less or Safeway! Fat Gay Bastard
ReplyDeleteFrom wiki
DeleteTrolling, identity, and anonymityEarly incidents of trolling were considered to be the same as flaming, but this has changed with modern usage by the news media to refer to the creation of any content that targets another person. The Internet dictionary NetLingo suggests there are four grades of trolling: playtime trolling, tactical trolling, strategic trolling, and domination trolling. [14] The relationship between trolling and flaming was observed in open-access forums in California, on a series of modem-linked computers in the 1970s, like CommuniTree which when accessed by high school teenagers became a ground for trashing and abuse. [15] Some psychologists have suggested that flaming would be caused by deindividuation or decreased self-evaluation: the anonymity of online postings would lead to disinhibition amongst individuals [16]
Others have suggested that although flaming and trolling is often unpleasant, it may be a form of normative behavior that expresses the social identity of a certain user group [17][18] According to Tom Postmes, a professor of social and organisational psychology at the universities of Exeter, England, and Groningen, The Netherlands, and the author of Individuality and the Group, who has studied online behavior for 20 years, "Trolls aspire to violence, to the level of trouble they can cause in an environment. They want it to kick off. They want to promote antipathetic emotions of disgust and outrage, which morbidly gives them a sense of pleasure." [15]
In academic literature, the practice of trolling was first documented by Judith Donath (1999). Donath's paper outlines the ambiguity of identity in a disembodied "virtual community" such as Usenet:
“ In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter. [19]
Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:
“ Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they – and the troll – understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group. Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling – where the rate of deception is high – many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation. [19]
Susan Herring and colleagues in "Searching for Safety Online: Managing 'Trolling' in a Feminist Forum" point out the difficulty inherent in monitoring trolling and maintaining freedom of speech in online communities: "harassment often arises in spaces known for their freedom, lack of censure, and experimental nature". [20] Free speech may lead to tolerance of trolling behavior, complicating the members' efforts to maintain an open, yet supportive discussion area, especially for sensitive topics such as race, gender, and sexuality.
Good Job one way to kill a Troll......Spam
Delete;) I am testing a question I posed.
DeleteHey Jim get back to me when you come on I got a question
DeleteI am on Harry. Do you want me to go into the forum for a message?
DeleteI wrote it below by accident
DeleteSaw it, replied below.
DeleteSlim Jim is pissed!
DeleteWere you at are you mad Bro?
Big Gayrod Jim Jr. Makes Richard Simons look as if he dose not even try to be Gay!
ReplyDeleteFrom wiki
DeleteTrolling, identity, and anonymityEarly incidents of trolling were considered to be the same as flaming, but this has changed with modern usage by the news media to refer to the creation of any content that targets another person. The Internet dictionary NetLingo suggests there are four grades of trolling: playtime trolling, tactical trolling, strategic trolling, and domination trolling. [14] The relationship between trolling and flaming was observed in open-access forums in California, on a series of modem-linked computers in the 1970s, like CommuniTree which when accessed by high school teenagers became a ground for trashing and abuse. [15] Some psychologists have suggested that flaming would be caused by deindividuation or decreased self-evaluation: the anonymity of online postings would lead to disinhibition amongst individuals [16]
Others have suggested that although flaming and trolling is often unpleasant, it may be a form of normative behavior that expresses the social identity of a certain user group [17][18] According to Tom Postmes, a professor of social and organisational psychology at the universities of Exeter, England, and Groningen, The Netherlands, and the author of Individuality and the Group, who has studied online behavior for 20 years, "Trolls aspire to violence, to the level of trouble they can cause in an environment. They want it to kick off. They want to promote antipathetic emotions of disgust and outrage, which morbidly gives them a sense of pleasure." [15]
In academic literature, the practice of trolling was first documented by Judith Donath (1999). Donath's paper outlines the ambiguity of identity in a disembodied "virtual community" such as Usenet:
“ In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter. [19]
Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:
“ Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they – and the troll – understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group. Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling – where the rate of deception is high – many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation. [19]
Susan Herring and colleagues in "Searching for Safety Online: Managing 'Trolling' in a Feminist Forum" point out the difficulty inherent in monitoring trolling and maintaining freedom of speech in online communities: "harassment often arises in spaces known for their freedom, lack of censure, and experimental nature". [20] Free speech may lead to tolerance of trolling behavior, complicating the members' efforts to maintain an open, yet supportive discussion area, especially for sensitive topics such as race, gender, and sexuality.
hey Richard, I mean Mr. Simons thought you was dead, your just Anon 2:16 not dead at all ha told you he was still sucking around somewhere, You have to look in the right ditch for the right slug..
DeleteNo ill ask right here was I wrong for tellin dude punch Rick in his face yesterday and ill take up a collection if you say I was wrong ill except it because I only respect your decision
DeleteWhat? My decision? If you think you wronged someone, that is between you and them. I don't promote violence normally but some people only learn by experience, usually painful. Stupid hurts. Most of these hoaxers are stupid. Example.
DeleteIf you want to keep a cow from eating your garden, you put an electric fence around it. The cow will hit the fence a few times and finally realize that the fence equals pain and stop leaning on the fence to eat your carrots. But sometimes you get a really stupid cow or a really mean one who likes the pain AND your carrots.
At that point you have two choices, sell the cow or eat the cow. With carrots and potatoes. And gravy, got to have gravy.
People are much the same way. Stupid hurts. But we can't sell them or eat them. So what do we do with them?
It looks like Ricky boy is a stubborn cow. How do you fix a stubborn cow you can't sell or eat? You turn up the voltage. Let him fry himself.
Just fyi, when he pulled his first freezer hoax, I sent him an email saying if he was hoaxing, I hoped someone kicked him in the nuts.
This time I hope he just gets ignored.
Good enough I just thought my wife was a little biased and yes your decision your one of the only decent people here so .......
DeleteDid you see that musky answer to those questions yesterday I hate how people think Chicago makes them tough guys very untrue and the south side isn't all bad till you get east around Ashland on the south side then you need to be or you'll get stomped
DeleteAnd nobody from Chicago is gonna let you blindfold him especially not a known criminal
DeleteI must have missed your wife's bias somewhere. But dragging me into something between you and your wife is a good way to get us both nutted. At least it is in my house. If I use anyone to help win an argument with the Boss, we both lose.
DeleteDyer is a tough one for me right now. He was asking about how to change his reputation etc awhile back. I told him I would leave him alone if he truly was. I know he has screwed up bigtime in the past.
He has ripped people off, scammed, lied and hit a pregnant woman. I am like you. I never hit a woman. But if a woman hits me like a guy, she is now a bitch and that is fair game. So far, never have had to use that though. Thank God.
Ricky will get his. Karma is a Bitch and She will get you. She has his name now.
I have been to Ill once as a kid, to Chanute AFB as a kid. Tough guys online or over phones crack me up too. All talk no walk. I especially love it when some bad ass gets his ass handed to him by a farm boy. You would think people would understand bucking hay, milking cows, digging, pushing pulling etc makes for a lot of strength and stamina. But some one always finally pushes the wrong button on one and gets his ass handed to them. Along with teeth.
I haven't been in a street fight in years thankfully. Lots of scuffles and restraints at work though, but I don't/can't swing back. We just strap them to their bed and give them a shot in the ass.
I know sure as shit no one is putting a blind fold on me without losing a limb or three unless I know them, they are female, and we are both naked. ;)
No she agreed with me Rick was a bitch I just thought she was biased because it's me this punk troll up top was the only one with a problem and of course he only posts anon so no one knows what a real bitch he is
DeleteYou mad Bro?
DeleteProbably Ricky himself. He floats around here. Or just another troll looking to piss someone off.
DeleteYou guys realize that BigJim is part of the hoaxer group MABRC.
DeleteSays a lot about the slag he writes.
Damn Jim you are on fire this morning!
DeleteBJ is MABRC? For real? His code name 'Fork and Spoon' operator?
DeleteI love the logical jumps some of these trolls take. Because some guy uses the same nickname, Big Jim, they assume it is me. That's why I add the Jr as most don't. Even though I have explained it they still think I was invited to be part of some non-existant meeting.
DeleteToo bad the logical jumps they take are not from high buildings or cliffs. Maybe they would do like lemmings and all follow. AHHHHHHSPLAT! Troll jelly. Might go good in some of those donuts they say I eat by the case.
WHERE IS THAT CREEPY FISH EYED FOOL STEVEN STREUFERT?!!! GUESS US TROLLS RAN THAT BUG EYED FAG OFF!!
ReplyDeleteALL CAPS
We will not rest until we have topped 'The Innocenceof Muslims'.
ReplyDeleteThat's how it's done ladies.
what the hee, just got up, went to my trusted source for important news, and this THANG what is it. He needs to find a Wizard, what can change him back into a real kinda human stead of that lil frog THANG LORDY LORDY, HELP THIS FUGLY LIL FROG FELLAR, he can't help that he got zapped by that witch.
ReplyDeleteWho are you, the man of constant ignorants?
DeleteAre you the wizard?that THANG FELLAR IS A NEEDING YOU, help it please..
DeleteCat shit Jay.... Whaddda got to say?
ReplyDeleteI say screw you aardvark arse anonymous ;)
DeleteBig Jim style: Trolling, identity, and anonymityEarly incidents of trolling were considered to be the same as flaming, but this has changed with modern usage by the news media to refer to the creation of any content that targets another person. The Internet dictionary NetLingo suggests there are four grades of trolling: playtime trolling, tactical trolling, strategic trolling, and domination trolling. [14] The relationship between trolling and flaming was observed in open-access forums in California, on a series of modem-linked computers in the 1970s, like CommuniTree which when accessed by high school teenagers became a ground for trashing and abuse. [15] Some psychologists have suggested that flaming would be caused by deindividuation or decreased self-evaluation: the anonymity of online postings would lead to disinhibition amongst individuals [16]
DeleteOthers have suggested that although flaming and trolling is often unpleasant, it may be a form of normative behavior that expresses the social identity of a certain user group [17][18] According to Tom Postmes, a professor of social and organisational psychology at the universities of Exeter, England, and Groningen, The Netherlands, and the author of Individuality and the Group, who has studied online behavior for 20 years, "Trolls aspire to violence, to the level of trouble they can cause in an environment. They want it to kick off. They want to promote antipathetic emotions of disgust and outrage, which morbidly gives them a sense of pleasure." [15]
In academic literature, the practice of trolling was first documented by Judith Donath (1999). Donath's paper outlines the ambiguity of identity in a disembodied "virtual community" such as Usenet:
“ In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter. [19]
Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:
“ Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they – and the troll – understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group. Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling – where the rate of deception is high – many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation. [19]
Susan Herring and colleagues in "Searching for Safety Online: Managing 'Trolling' in a Feminist Forum" point out the difficulty inherent in monitoring trolling and maintaining freedom of speech in online communities: "harassment often arises in spaces known for their freedom, lack of censure, and experimental nature". [20] Free speech may lead to tolerance of trolling behavior, complicating the members' efforts to maintain an open, yet supportive discussion area, especially for sensitive topics such as race, gender, and sexuality.
Lighten up Jay!! If the words "Cat Shit Jay" bother you, you must have thin skin. By your profile, I see your still a youngster. Trust me, if you cannot handle this now, life will be very tough on you. The real world don't give two shits about you, me or anyone else. You have to learn to roll with the punches. Chose your battles wisely. Just some words of advise from an older person.
DeleteI know what you mean. I try to have a thick skin, but when people tell me that I'm not intelligent and such, I have to defend myself.
DeleteFeline Feces Jay, just tell thse jagoffs: blow me !
DeleteYour a smart kid. You don't have to prove it. Let these comments go right over your head.
DeleteIncredible quest there. What occurred after?
ReplyDeleteTake care!
My webpage ... ziing.com
You suck!
DeleteThe post here can be funny but when their racist side comes out it isn't quite that funny.
ReplyDeleteI keep my poop in a jar.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of trolls a few of us have been trying to track down an FTP website that an ex member of the MABRC, stashed a lot of unfavorable info on has anyone heard of this?
ReplyDelete?
DeleteI once met a troll named Franciscus,
ReplyDeleteGobbling up chocolate biscuits,
I said 'take it easy!'
He answered real breezy:
'Us sceptards are willing to risk it.'
Here in this chair is where I sit,
DeleteI tried to fart and out came a shit!
Master Blaster runs barter town.
ReplyDeleteNot shit, ENERGY!
DeleteSay again !
DeleteSo Big Jim Jr, I herd you liek mudkips
ReplyDeleteHumping pokeman? Nah, not my cup of tea. I leave that to the mentally challenged and trolls. Most of which interchange.
DeleteThat was funny and sadly true. You have to wonder about the empty lives of people who spend their days picking fights with complete strangers on the Internet.
ReplyDeleteBig Jim style: Trolling, identity, and anonymityEarly incidents of trolling were considered to be the same as flaming, but this has changed with modern usage by the news media to refer to the creation of any content that targets another person. The Internet dictionary NetLingo suggests there are four grades of trolling: playtime trolling, tactical trolling, strategic trolling, and domination trolling. [14] The relationship between trolling and flaming was observed in open-access forums in California, on a series of modem-linked computers in the 1970s, like CommuniTree which when accessed by high school teenagers became a ground for trashing and abuse. [15] Some psychologists have suggested that flaming would be caused by deindividuation or decreased self-evaluation: the anonymity of online postings would lead to disinhibition amongst individuals [16]
ReplyDeleteOthers have suggested that although flaming and trolling is often unpleasant, it may be a form of normative behavior that expresses the social identity of a certain user group [17][18] According to Tom Postmes, a professor of social and organisational psychology at the universities of Exeter, England, and Groningen, The Netherlands, and the author of Individuality and the Group, who has studied online behavior for 20 years, "Trolls aspire to violence, to the level of trouble they can cause in an environment. They want it to kick off. They want to promote antipathetic emotions of disgust and outrage, which morbidly gives them a sense of pleasure." [15]
In academic literature, the practice of trolling was first documented by Judith Donath (1999). Donath's paper outlines the ambiguity of identity in a disembodied "virtual community" such as Usenet:
“ In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter. [19]
Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:
“ Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they – and the troll – understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group. Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling – where the rate of deception is high – many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation. [19]
Susan Herring and colleagues in "Searching for Safety Online: Managing 'Trolling' in a Feminist Forum" point out the difficulty inherent in monitoring trolling and maintaining freedom of speech in online communities: "harassment often arises in spaces known for their freedom, lack of censure, and experimental nature". [20] Free speech may lead to tolerance of trolling behavior, complicating the members' efforts to maintain an open, yet supportive discussion area, especially for sensitive topics such as race, gender, and sexuality.
Very informative, not very often I say that on this site :)
DeleteOne day I'm gonna catch my own Sasquatch...cook him up in a pot.
ReplyDeleteRover, Wanderer, Nomad, Vagabond...Call Me What You Will - Sasquatchica -
ReplyDeleteMetallica RULES!!!!!! And so do you Anon 12:59!
DeleteWhat do you call the hair between your grandmas titties?
ReplyDeleteHer vagina.
:o
^^^^^Best one I heard all day!! LMFAO
DeleteThats Melissa Adair (bigfoot chick/troll) without any makeup on!
ReplyDeleteI triple dog dare anyone to do the Truffle Shuffle to gangnam style with the words changed to Big Jim style. Make sure you record it so we can see it on Tosh.O and other internet spoof shows.
ReplyDeleteAdd in mudkips and you will rocket to the top!
DeleteI like how this Big Jim complains about trolls on an arrival about trolls, just seems kinda dumb
ReplyDeleteEXACTLY! Why would a troll waste so much time on a site about bigfoot then? Just seems kinda dumb.
ReplyDeleteBig Jim do you actually believe in Bigfoot?
DeleteYes I do. I have explained why several times. So to keep it short, no I have never seen one. The reason I post like I do is because many pics and vids are being swallowed whole even when obviously junk or hoax. I wish everyone would look at things more centered than everything is hoax or everything is real. So I post hoping those who are moderate will look closer instead of jumping to conclusions.
DeleteBig Jim, please read my post below. I am Anon 11:55 and also the guy above who asked you if you believed. Thanks, Erik (First Skeptard to use his real name)
DeleteYou remember how this site use to be then. I am sorry, it really has gotten bad. And you also picked up on the problem with the bigfoot world. I am looking into something right now about our crazy little world of bigfoot and tbe experts. I noticed a curious pattern and am seeing if it follows what I think it does.
DeleteI wish you well in your education on bigfoot. Just remember to keep an open mind and use a keen eye when looking at "proof". Most is junk.
Shawn, I use to love reading all the different comments, but after all the TROLLS took over i find them disgusting to say the least, and im sure im not the only one who stopped reading them. I just read the story now and don't even look at the comments. You should take a poll and see how many have stopped reading all the comments in here, like i said im 100% sure im not the only one.
ReplyDeleteHe knows this too. But I imagine the clicks are more important. When those like you stop even reading the site and those like me finally tire completely of wading into it and stop, he will be left with only trolls trolling trolls. And they will rapidly tire of that and find another site. That will be the end of BE.
DeleteThe reason we trolls get on here is because we make each other laugh our ass off! Even you "Believer's" have to laugh your asses off at times. There are some potential comedians on here. I only come here to laugh. Don't take life so serious. We all know laughter is the best medicine. Can't we all just get along? Skeptards and Believers. You can't have one without the other.
DeleteWell said, Sir ! It's a Bigfoot blog after all - and that stinky fuck is out there !
DeleteThanks Shawn!! I feel very honored. The last post about Obama care was mine. Thanks for recognizing us funny troll/skeptics.
ReplyDeleteT
THAT'S IT. I GAVE THIS SITE WAAAY TOO MANY CHANCES TO CLEAN ITSELF UP AND TO FOLD ITSELF INTO RELEVANCY BY GETTING RID OF ALL THE RUBBISH COMMENTS OR TURNING OFF THE COMMENTS TO LET THE MESSAGE SHINE THROUGH, NOT THE ANTICS OF A COUPLE OF 14 YEAR OLD TWATS.
ReplyDeleteYOUR SITE HAS AND IS GIVING THE WHOLE BIGFOOT SUBJECT A BLACK EYE, AND DOES NOTHING TO FURTHER THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SUBJECT OF BIGFOOT ...
I think the Bigfoot Subject and all involved gave ITSELF a "Black Eye". How many people have you Footers put your trust and faith into, to only find out that they are/were Hoaxers. It's all about money man, can't you see that?? WAKE UP!!!There is no BIGFOOT/SASQUATCH. It's a fictitious "Monster" that is making a select few quite rich. It's just not you Footers that are getting "Taken" it's also people that believe in UFO's, Ghost, Loch Ness, Chupacabra, the 12th Planet etc. There are suckers born every minute. Don't be one of them. But if you are, don't get pissed when sane, rational people oppose your fictitious believes. If the Non-Believers had a site, I am sure you Believers would be on there fucking with us also. Granted a 14 year old kid will fuck with both of us, just because he can. They are the real trolls. Your blind ignorance will have you chasing something that doesn't exist. Put all your time and effort into your family, like you do Bigfoot, and the world would be a better place.
DeleteI think a lot of us Skeptards landed on this site because we either wanted to believe in bigfoot or were curious about the subjuct of bigfoot. At first it was cool tring to read and try to somewhat educate our/myself about the subjuct, then you realize the Bigfoot world is like a 3 ring circus! 3 stories or hoaxes going on at all times. Snake oil salesmen, and con artist around every corner. I applaud anyone that makes a TRUE effort to go out and actual try, at least you are getting in shape even though you aren't going to find anything.
DeleteOh yeah, great... let's give these unfunny douchebags to turn it up a notch. Just what this pathetic site needed. Well I've got some news for you kiddo, I'm taking me and my ten fake friends elsewhere.
ReplyDeleteAnd tell me something, If a site welcomes and condones trolls and encourages them to be 'more' active, is it really trolling? It seems more like the norm, and everything else is in the background.
BIG JIM IS A BIG DOUCHE
ReplyDeleteSo how am I gay if I am used to flush vaginas or to leave a woman feeling fresh and clean? I have left many a vag dripping fluids. And most woman with a smile.
DeleteI have been told gays don't need douche, just some fiber. Or a garden hose. Ladies who are gay still use me though, that should tell you something. Once you go Big Jim Jr, you never go back or black. :)
I much prefer to be a douche than say a toilet snake or plunger. Maybe you can tell me how it feels to be one?