Steven Streufert: Ketchum Report Release Date Announced!


Steven Streufert has the scoop on the release date of Dr. Melba Ketchum's Bigfoot DNA paper and it looks like it could be published any time now. He writes:

Well, we have waited forever for this. Igor Burtsev of Russia and Robyn Lynne ForestPeople of Lalaland have announced on Facebook the official publication date of the Ketchum Bigfoot DNA Study!
SOOOON!

Check out Streufert's blog for the countdown timer: thebigfootnews.blogspot.com

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Streufert is lying. As usual.

      Delete
    2. Ha ha Real Funny! Lies and pissing people off is stupid twisted humor.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, that's real funny. Thanks for contributing to the bat shit crazy world of bigfoot. On the one hand bitch and moan about its lack of legitimacy, then just add to the confusion.

      Delete
    4. And you are supposed to be one of the smart people in "the community"?

      Delete
    5. I give Melba credit because she is mature enough not to respond like a child to this crap.

      Delete
    6. Relax,its fucking bigfoot,how serious should it be?

      Delete
    7. If you can't laugh, I guess you are missing the point.

      Delete
    8. For a lot of people it is serious douche ! For the 6 freaks who comment every other post who say taterhole/Looney toons it is a joke and apparently Streufert as well.

      Delete
    9. I find Bigfooting serious. I find humor in lots of things but not at the expense of others. That's reserved to low life's and adult bullies who act like children.

      Delete
    10. STEVEN DO YOU HAVE A GIRLFRIEND???

      Delete
    11. Why is it not serious? ! Some find it not and some do. I just don't agree on belittling someone who is trying and teasing them like a little child!

      Delete
    12. Wow,Lon Strickler is also a serious man,such as yourself

      Delete
    13. Haaaarhh,suck them titties

      Delete
    14. jump in harry,waters warm tonite

      Delete
    15. Yeah apparently I've been being a bully and that was the only reason I started to post was I was tired of all the bullies

      Delete
    16. harry you're only a bully if theres a victim and theres no victims here,just adults who can handle words,I hope

      Delete
    17. Funny, really... What did this post even say about Ketchum herself? Nothing. But I notice all the people defending her against "the meanies" are pretty good at mean, debased, anonymous trolling all by themselves. Hypocrite cult sycophants....

      Delete
    18. You are addressing everyone here with a pretty big stroke, Steven. I don't think the majority of posters are mean or trollish. Sure, there are some- but if Shawn felt the need to moderate that could change- it's his call.

      Delete
    19. I am not "addressing everyone here," but only certain ones. Of course you see that, right? I think it is pretty obvious that the intelligent ones here agree with my positions, largely, whatever they may think of the DNA study debacle.

      Delete
    20. You're just plain weird Stevie, you seem even madder than SWP or Fasano so why don't you just go away it's obvious you're in the wrong field of fake interest here. Duh.

      Delete
  2. First of all first!!! And second she better hurry before the world ends I'd hare for the end to come without seeing u trolls eat crow

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The grand announcement if Bigfoot exist or not will be presented on December 22, 2012. One day after the Mayan Apocalypse. I guess we'll never find out if there's a Bigfoot or not!

      Delete
    2. Hang in there, it's obvious the big hairy guys will make it and the rest of us will sink so if you're lucky you will see a few Bigfoots here and there before you drown too.

      Delete
  3. I ALSO THINK STEVEN STREUFERT IS SOOOO SEXY!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steven Streufer is the lost grandson of actor Peter Lorre.

      Delete
    2. STEVEN STREUFERT YOU FUCKIN DOUCEBAG!! I "REALLY" FUCKIN BELIEVED THAT SHIT!!!!!

      Delete
    3. Sorry, but it really is time to lighten up about all of this Bigfoot stuff. So far the Ketchum project is doing a grand job tearing itself to pieces. I used to take out seriously, and supported it, but now I can only chuckle. I do hope something good and real can come out of it, even though I'm certain now it will not be the 100% home run we and all of those dedicated researchers contributing to it had wished it to be.

      Delete
    4. contributed?! WTF did YOU contribute?!

      Delete
    5. Did I say that I contributed DNA to this study? No, I did not. I am thinking of all of the others who did and were a part of it, and feel betrayed and have now defected from it.

      As far as my contribution, it is what it is. I never claim any more than what I do, just as I am doing now and do every day. You can ask Daniel Perez, though, if you'd really like. He gave us the Bigfooter of the Year award. Ask Bill Munns, Bart Cutino, Robert Leiterman, Bobo and Cliff, and Shawn Evidence for that matter, just to name a few.

      Delete
    6. you speak of daniel perez like he's a big name in the bigfoot community! daniel perez AIN'T SHIT!! bigfoot times... really?? so what!

      Delete
    7. SS is a counterproductive clown like all the other BF kooks lately, the world won't end from a flood or something normal like that, the scenario will be a massive tsunami of crow floating fast upon these freaks totally consuming and engulfing them all never to be heard from again.

      Delete
  4. I have come to the conclusion even if the results come out, know will believe bigfoot exist until someone famous catches one on video or someone tranquilizes it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ketchum just doesn't have the credibility.

      Delete
    2. Not to liars like you but she will to everyone else.

      Delete
  5. What's Streuferts beef with Melba? He's one who just stirs shit up!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At first I didn't think it was jealousy, but it looks more and more like it.

      Delete
    2. To be honest with all of you, Melba's paper has mostly assumptions on it and cannot be published like that, she must make corrections that are based on facts to even have a chance of being published.

      Delete
    3. I am not a geneticist. Why would I be jealous??

      I'd be very happy indeed to see any verifiable proof of Bigfoot, whoever achieves it. So far the Ketchumites have offered nothing but circus.

      Delete
    4. oh shut the fuck up streufert! now you wanna play victim?! go fuck yourself fish eyed bastard!!!!!

      Delete
    5. Oh look, here come the feeble idiots. How entertaining, how they make my points for me so decidedly!

      Who is playing victim?? Certainly not me.

      Delete
    6. the ONLY feeble idiot is you! ketchum study, just plain old satire? really?! how fuckin old are you? the shit isn't funny when we take aim on your stupid ass but its ok when its at dr ketchums expense?! thats why i don't fuckin like your ugly stupid ass!!! jealous bastard..

      Delete
    7. I am deeply impressed by your intellectual depth, and stunned by the sophistication of your argument. Thanks for talking!

      Delete
    8. Bet your ass he's jealous but like all cowards, I think of at least two others frequenting this place with their inane banter and silly videos, also afraid to admit it so they attack her. So what about the way it's been handled with facebook and all that shit, the science behind it apparently is solid so shut up and go with that. Just because you impatiently want it out like yesterday means squat.

      Delete
  6. I'm not first and neither are you. Ketchum et al are. Good on them. Can't wait for the Erickson documentary to follow, as well as others who will step forward with their footage/pics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Years of talk, so far no evidence provided. It is time to up or shut up.

      Give it a couple of weeks. You will be astonished at the revelations coming soon.

      Delete
    2. Just shut up already, go attack Rick Dyer or some faker like that you're basically at his level anyway.

      Delete
  7. Now maybe everybody will stop whining / bitching!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bigfoot is eating corn right now. Guarantee

    ReplyDelete
  9. Steven Streufert has shown little tact or integrity in his handling of all things "Melba DNA study" and "MK Davis". I'm not saying he's a bad guy, but he makes himself seem like a bad guy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, he doesn't make himself "seem" anything. He is a rational human that uses logic and common sense while addressing some of the more outlandish claims made by people in this so called field. Hope to make it to the book store some day Steven! Gonna be in Cali next spring but won't be able to make it that far, maybe next time.

      Delete
    2. THE ONLY RATIONAL THING STEVEN STREUFERT DOES IS GIVE REACH AROUNDS!! OH AND BEG FOR DONATIONS TO PURCHASE TRAILCAMS...

      Delete
    3. Anon 1:54, as I pointed out before, SS's trouble is lack of logic. No he doesn't use logic and common sense as you claim here. He lacks both.

      He said that the Ketchum paper being rejected proves there is no conspiracy to suppress it.

      In other words, the Ketchum paper being suppressed is proof it isn't being suppressed. It was crazy-talk.

      Conspiracy people have been saying all along it could be suppressed. Then when word came from SS that the paper was supposedly rejected by various journals, SS claimed that was proof there was no conspiracy to suppress/reject it.

      It was absolute lunatic talk.

      He made no sense then and probably doesn't now.

      Delete
    4. Okay Slicer, I'm sorry, you really do try to understand don't you. For your entire argument to be valid you have to present evidence and/or proof that the ketchum report was indeed suppressed. You have neither. Don't worry though, "conspiracy people" have been saying all along the world is going to end Friday night.

      Delete
    5. Um, MR. "SLICER," look dude... I NEVER SAID THAT.

      Nice example of a logical fallacy on your part, though.

      Delete
    6. It doesn't make one a "bad guy" to apply a little scrutiny to things claimed, as in fact they are the ones making claims to science, and scrutiny is exactly what science does.

      Delete
    7. Why do you keep stirring crap up? ^ a little support for the field would be nice!

      Delete
    8. So, Ketchum should be exempt from the usual scrutiny of science while making unsubstantiated claims to having "science"? Sorry, but I am not the one who compared Bigfoot to the Nephilim. The way they have handled this whole project they have asked for it, really. If they want their science to be accepted by Science they are going to have to be ready for a little criticism and stop playing the victims.

      Delete
    9. That's all well and good that you pointed it out, Steven. Point taken. But to continue to hammer on it continuously does no one any good.

      Delete
    10. Its better than flir clips any day

      Delete
    11. Did she?... If you are such a logical and free thinker, then why are you using Lindsay's crap against her?

      The way "They" have handled this whole project was the correct way.. They kept their mouths shut.. Yet somehow you seem to have inside info about it.

      If anything regarding Angel's or Nephilim was stated on her facebook (Which she denies and i can't find it posted anywhere.) Then that is really non of your concern is it? Her personal belief is her personal belief. She is free to pray to her God and you are free to keep praying to Robert Lindsay.

      But according to George Knapp and David Paulides, her paper says nothing of the sort.

      So are we to understand that you are attacking her religious views?

      Delete
    12. Streufert is hurting the Bigfoot World!

      Delete
    13. And what do you Steven say to claims of begging for donations for trail cams and never buying them?

      Delete
    14. Anonymous 2012 5:12:00 PM PST.

      What do I say? I say it is FALSE.

      The trail camera project was created by Jamie S., a college student with limited funds. He is one of our research affiliates in the Bluff Creek Film Site Project. We decided to include him and his idea as an extension of the research we did down there.

      ALL OF THE CAMERAS WERE IMPLEMENTED. ALL OF THE MONEY WAS SPENT (AND MORE BY JAMIE OF HIS OWN FUNDS) ON CAMERAS AND BATTERIES.

      So, once again some fool making accusations is wrong.

      It wasn't "begging" at all. It was a PUBLIC research project to which people could contribute if they liked. We doubled our goal and doubled the camera coverage. Jeez, you know, WE did all the work, and we aren't making a dime.

      I'm sure once our photos are up you will have some other nasty thing to say about what you have just gotten for free and by donating nothing, right? Some people are never satisfied, I guess.

      Delete
    15. well,not me anyway,but thats not your fault

      Delete
    16. Tzieth, what is YOUR source of information?
      I suggest you view the video on this page, and see what someone who actually worked with Ketchum says:
      http://thebigfootnews.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-truth-about-ketchum-bigfoot-dna.html

      Don't go trying to say I am attacking her religious views. She is perfectly welcome to believe in the Easter Bunny for all I care, so long as she doesn't call it "SCIENCE."

      Delete
    17. No sir I just seen that rumor many times and wanted to know for myself if I should treat you like an asshole

      Delete
    18. Confirmation of the Nephilim beliefs of Ketchum have of course not been posted on her Facebook wall. This has been confirmed by many sources who spoke with her and heard it from her DIRECTLY. In fact was known by many way BEFORE Robert Lindsay ever published anything about it. Rhettman Mullis of Bigfootology also confirms it; but hearing it coming from the Richard Stubstad/Robert Schmalzbach source really finalizes it. It is simply a fact, that she believes in some sort of "out of this world" alteration of the DNA. Paulides does, too.

      Delete
    19. Contrary to popular belief I don't pick on anyone who doesnt deserve it

      Delete
    20. Two things here Steven...
      #1 Would you use an Ex-Girlfriend that you dumped as a Job reference? Or If you were hiring someone, and this person just starts downing their ex-boss whom fired them, would you hire them?.. It's the same difference.

      #2 This guy has connections with Tom Biscardi!!! I would have fired him as well as he was a liability. If no one would take that paper serious before, they sure as hell would not take it serious at that point even if this guy truly wasn't part of a Biscardi hoax. Your own colleges were quick to point out the Tent Bigfoot vid was directly related to Dyer. How is one Biscardi protege any different from another?

      George Knapp addressed this on Coast to Coast-am, as did David Paulides. Both whom have read the full report stated that these were vicious fabricated rumors.

      Delete
    21. wow tzieth,you listen to those podcasts too?I don't get much further than here,where do you guys find the time?

      Delete
    22. Ketchum does believe in the Nephilim theory. I've spoke with people close to her and that's what they told me. By the way, Ketchum hasn't come out publicly deny the Bigfoot rape thing or the Nepilim thing.

      Delete
    23. "but hearing it coming from the Richard Stubstad/Robert Schmalzbach source really finalizes it. It is simply a fact, that she believes in some sort of "out of this world" alteration of the DNA. Paulides does, too."

      May Richard Stubstad rest in peace, but this is still hear-say made by disgruntled Ex-colleagues. This is not proof and without recorded evidence, you certainly CANNOT call it a fact.

      Delete
    24. rumferlifeMonday, December 17, 2012 6:16:00 PM PST
      wow tzieth,you listen to those podcasts too?I don't get much further than here,where do you guys find the time?

      Here you go.. fast forward to about 9:00 (9 minutes)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvsURt8LKuw

      Delete
    25. thanks for cutting to the chase for me

      Delete
    26. There are reasons they are ex-colleagues, and that has to do with a certain veterinarian's desire to possess all profit and glory from this, disbanding a legally established corporation and cutting out the man who made the primary discovery basis of her project as he died of cancer. Consider, perhaps, that there may be very good reasons why some are angry with her.

      Delete
    27. i can agree with you on that! she did screw Richard over but you don't have a fuckin thing to do with any of it and it is NOT your place to be trying out no one.. mind your own business and tend to that raggedy ass hole in the wall piece of shit shack book store..

      Delete
    28. Anonymous, I am involved, as a member of this research community that has been held hostage by this "be nice to Melba, support the study" bullshit. Our patience has been abused, not by legitimate peer review processes, but by the whacked out things that she and her supporters have said and done.

      Perhaps you should mind your own business, man, as you do not know me, my store or anything much apparently. Besides, that is wholly irrelevant, a pointless and ridiculous thing to say that only demonstrates the weakness of your argument.

      Delete
    29. You're full of shit, Steve. AND clearly jealous. Word of advice to people; ignore his clueless bullshit.

      Delete
  10. Unless and until these things are proven, I don't think anyone in Bigfootland should accuse anyone else of being in LaLaLand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blueberry bagels to you, then. I've got a stick structure for sale, too, if you'd like to see it. Prime location, wooded lot, feeding station already installed.

      Delete
    2. Don't blame the messenger. I am not the one making extraordinary claims.

      Delete
    3. Not accusing, I have DNA proof that Ketchum fans are from Lalaland. There's paper coming out... it's really long, like 7 or 8 pages.

      Delete
    4. Yes you definitely are, SS, the one making extraordinary claims by painting a picture of fakery on her part merely because you haven't read the paper yet. You're trash, pure trash. Lindsay may not be on speaking terms with Ketchum, but at least he seems to know - because he's evidently smarter than a trailer can of worms like you - that her study claims are indeed good.

      Delete
  11. I checked BOTH their Facebook pages and they say nothing about it being published this Thursday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't see it either ...

      Delete
    2. i got the message via mindspeak, that's how ketchum prefers it.

      Delete
  12. wheres Matilda in all this? I wanna see Matilda! is she living with Ketchum? who is studying Matilda's DNA? is she related to mucklegrunt or was that just anonymous nonsense being posted in the comments section?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She's working the Bigfoot Strip Club.
      The economy has sent us Bigfoots into doing things we don't want to do.And yes,she is related to Mucklegrunt.She is my wife.

      Delete
    2. LONG LIVE MUCKLEGRUNT!!

      Delete
    3. Matilda went Christmas shopping with Grandma Patty.

      Delete

  13. So just another joke posting by SS to stir up the masses, way to go and enjoy your clicks Shawn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, if you believe him, it got him from an outhouse to a "small apartment". I don't know how this blog could make that kind of revenue but that is what he says.

      Delete
    2. if dave lamb nipples got him that apartment he owes me,so shawn,please confirm if renae is a Rush fan

      Delete
  14. this is a preview I'm leaking!! "read this"!!

    The Red Deer Cave people are the youngest known prehistoric population who do not look like modern humans. Fossils dated between 14,500 and 11,500 years old were found in Red Deer Cave and Longlin Cave in China. Having a mix of archaic and modern features, they are tentatively thought to be a separate species of humans that became extinct without contributing to the gene pool of modern humans.[1] Evidence shows large deer were cooked in the Red Deer Cave giving the people their name.

    In spite of their relatively recent age,(15,000 bp) the fossils exhibit features of more primitive humans. The Red Deer Cave dwellers had distinctive features that differ from modern humans: flat face, broad nose, jutting jaw with no chin, large molars, prominent brows, thick skull bones, and moderate-size brain.

    Attempts to extract DNA have been so far unsuccessful but are continuing. Only once this is done will it be possible to determine the relationship between this group and other modern humans.
    This be them folks!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is the real deal folks!

      Delete
    2. "This be them folks!!"

      What I can't seem to find though is any reference to size/height, only partial limb fragments have been found.
      It would be interesting to compare a Red Deer skull with a humans for scale.
      You know what I am saying here, if Red Deer Man is BF then it needs to show some bulk and height.

      Delete
    3. ah,the hell with the science,its them

      Delete
  15. I can't wait for this paper to be released and we can finally learn how "mind-rape" and "Angel DNA" tie into the bigfoot phenomenon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems as if your mind and ars has been raped. The angel DNA is simply the remnants of sperm left on your chafed bunghold from the ars rape. You often speak of rape this indicated that you are wanting the meat.

      Delete
    2. Anon 3:27, until you learn to spell, don't insult anyone's intelligence. Anon 3:46, you and a bunch of other footers really seem to have some bizarre gay sex fantasies.

      If you guys don't like mind rape, angel DNA, or blueberry bagels, take it up with Melba and the other bleevers. You guys all look retarded defending this nonsense.

      Have fun with your telepathic squatch friends!

      Delete
    3. Anon 4:14 you must have been dropped on your head as a baby moron! You must have convinced your moronic mind that Telepathic shit is real. Your one of the only idiots on here believes that crap. The serious footers here don't believe that crap so keep trying to convince us that telepathic crap is real ( apparently you believe it you tin hat pussy because u keep bringing it up) .

      Delete
  16. What a definitive release date! Soon!! She hasnt been saying that for 5 years, has she?

    Lol, but still you footers will believe this, and make up excuses when it doesnt come true. Hahaha, like dealing with children!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Indian tridbes have said that exposing the Sasquatch, will bekon the ending of the world, Kinda looking that way now

    ReplyDelete
  18. **SOON * **SOON*
    Look at Steve's countdown timers, lol They are set for the same day but with different times to them, LMAO YEAP, SOON, LMAO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's Leap Year dumb ass! Duhhh.

      Delete
    2. One is set on Texas time, the other at the International Date Line.

      Delete
  19. One thing he is good at, is blowing his big mouth that is somthing he does real well.He dont no shit about bigfoot but HE BLOWS THAT MOUTH REAL WELL !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah right. How many times have you been on George Noory's show?

      Quit being the biggest dickhead east of the Rockies.

      Delete
    2. Actually I've been on there at least a dozen times.And you?

      Delete
    3. I "dont no shit about bigfoot"? Gotta love it! I did learn a little about the English language in school, however.

      As you "know" so much about Bigfoot, I do encourage you sincerely to come forth with your proof.

      Delete
    4. I know you like to throw out phrases like "straw man" and "ad hominem" quite a bit. Why don't you show some of that knowledge and do something constructive with it? Attacking people daily, even if you have a point, doesn't count.

      Delete
    5. Having access to the papers on this DNA study, I will say this. Melba has assumed a lot, putting her personal beliefs over facts does not earn her merits in the science world. She has demonstrated that she is not neutral and it has flawed her findings. Rejection will happen unless she rewrites the whole thing and leaves out all the nonfactual belief statements. I do believe her career might be over in the DNA field, especially after hearing her talk about the sexual encounters with an invisible Sasquatch.

      Delete
    6. You know who blows? Melba... BIgfoot told me so, she blows real good!

      Delete
    7. There is a difference between attacking a person and criticizing ideas and philosophical positions. Logical fallacies are only operant in the latter realm of discourse. I am not attacking the person, Ketchum, whom I do not know, but only the arguments and really silly statements and claims of her and her followers. It would be nice if we could discuss some actual science and evidence, but despite all of their outlandish claims and talk, they have not released any.

      Delete
    8. Sometimes the difference between attacking a person and criticizing their ideas becomes nebulous given enough time. I would say at times it has become a kind of ridicule. I think enough red flags have been put forth to create a public record of criticisms.

      Delete
    9. What silly statements did she make that didn't meet your high standards, Streufass? I hope you're not believing all the mindrape or angel DNA crap because then you're really the stupid one here, none of that nonsense is in her paper. For Pete's sake. LOL

      Delete
  20. Leap year has NOTHING to do with 2 timers set for the same DAY on Steve's Web site, Check it and DUHH BACK AT YOU, IDIOT!

    ReplyDelete
  21. It's just a bad Mayan calendar joke. I don't think the paper's really set for publication on Friday.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Where is the link to these Facebook posts from Igor and Lala Lady? I didn't see much on Steven's blog.....or is this an End of the World joke?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Just another day in the toon factory.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Since this morning, I have been curious about a non-descript posting in the embargoed articles list. Just a label of 'Genetics' with the embargo lifted around the time this counter points to.
    C

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check out this screen shot:

      https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150839011131983&set=o.302563073109138&type=1&theater

      Delete
  25. I don't care WHO "discovers" or proves Bigfoot. All I want is the truth and the reality, whatever it is, behind this odd phenomenon. Let me be absolutely clear: whatever the Ketchum study may prove, good for her. At this point I have little faith left in the study, but that is not because of "jealousy" or "hate" or her claims that Bigfoot is some kind of human. Is that clear enough? I have no investment in any theory of Bigfoot that cannot be proven factually, in accordance with reality. If you have a theory of Bigfoot, PROVE it somehow first, before you get all crazy claiming it is true. OK? Good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is your reason then to continuously hammer on the same damn things over and over again? It just comes off as poor form. We get it.

      Delete
    2. Better than flir clips...now you got us all hammering

      Delete
    3. Steven, I have no faith in the study, I simply don't think it is legit. After witnessing the lies and BS that come from the Ketchum camp I just don't see any of them as being credible... We are looking for a naturally deceased body to prove it once and for all.

      Delete
    4. that would do it,hey Rush can you narrow down a state,is it northeast?I'm gonna hang with you someday bigfoot or not

      Delete
    5. rumfer, I help research in many states and we are looking all over North America. I reside in the Midwest.

      Delete
    6. I'm new york my friend,but don't hold it against me

      Delete
    7. Rum my friend, I don't hold anything against anybody, race, creed, nationality etc... I am all about collaboration and that is the only way this is going to get accomplished.

      Delete
    8. some kicking Rush tunes couldn't hurt either

      Delete
    9. You can say you "get it," but the Ketchumites are actively denying these things, actively lying and obfuscating. Science is not achieved via propaganda and Facebook cheerleading. The truth will out, soon enough. Give it a couple of weeks. You will be astonished at the revelations coming soon.

      Delete
    10. But at the same time, you are countering much of the cheer-leading with with things that will most likely not be in the paper. If things in the paper turn out to be insane, then criticize them at that time.

      Delete
    11. There is already much to criticize, especially as I know a lot of what has gone on behind the scenes. Perhaps the paper, will prove something or other in some way, but at this point I seriously doubt it. None of what I've said is anything I just made up; it has all come from very credible sources involved closely with the study.

      Delete
    12. What Ketchum camp lies and BS? If you don't like the way the study's leaning towards scientifically don't bother commenting, wait for something else then. And who cares what you believe or doubt, SS. This is not about what you or anybody else believes, it's not religion though you seem to be turning it into such.

      Delete
  26. I Ketchum really did destroy her samples then this I all completely irrelevant as the study will be unreproducible and consequentially useless.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Don't forget kids,Igor says they developed their own process to mine all that great bigfoot dna,thats going to come back to bite them right in the arse

    ReplyDelete
  28. Shawn post up melbas latest radio interview its on zombietoms YouTube channel. Some really interesting stuff and she says for the second time it will be weeks not months.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Slim difference between satire and plain old mean jackassery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As is commonly demonstrated by anonymous comments here, like yours.

      Delete
    2. hello steve, are you single? im just curious because i think you are very handsome.

      Delete
    3. handsome?!!!! you need to get your EYES checked!! he's the ugliest son of a bitch in all of bigfootery!! and thats a FACT!! very ugly eyes!

      Delete
    4. Oh look, here come the feeble idiots. How entertaining, how they make my points for me so decidedly!

      Delete
    5. you are one lonely sad fuck...

      Delete
    6. Proving my point again. Just look at these maniacs.

      Delete
    7. Yes we can't stop, you've got us hypnotized.

      Delete
  30. Eeeeewwww! look at steven streuferts profile pix... that mf'er has the audacity to crack a smile.........can you say CREEEEPY?????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh look, here come the feeble idiots. How entertaining, how they make my points for me so decidedly!

      Anonymous cowards, you are pathetic.

      Delete
    2. answer this question: DO YOU HAVE A GIRLFRIENd STEVEN??

      Delete
    3. I'm not the one calling you names, but if the person wasn't anonymous, would it make a difference to you?

      Delete
    4. Yes, in terms of personal accountability and responsibility, it would make a difference. Most of these trolls are actually Bigfoot researcher types defending their particular culty factions, and they pathetically don't even have the guts to stand on their own two feet and put their name on the false, insane and sick things they say. They are cowards.

      Delete
    5. steven you attention whore! the fact that you respond to EACH AND EVERYONE proves you are one sad lonely pathetic bastard.. NOW i know you don't have a girlfriend..or boyfriend.......

      Delete
    6. There you go again. It is hilarious. You really don't know much of anything, do you?

      Delete
    7. There YOU go again you unenlightened egomaniac, what are you, that Bravo dude's cell mate ?

      Delete
  31. Bigfoot has always been and always WILL BE a fucking joke. A joke which was first carried out by a couple of midget cowboy conmen and continues to fool the mentally challenged.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Suppresses reality thus subconsciously seeks out bf sites. ^

      Delete
  32. "As the company has yet to publish the study and Ketchum refuses to discuss the details of how the samples were obtained, the methodology, or the results, the only socially responsible stance on this subject is skeptical neutrality."

    http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/18/3780240/why-is-bigfoot-eating-bagels

    ReplyDelete
  33. “At this stage we have no detailed description of their analysis approach, no information about exactly how the source of the samples was confirmed, and no raw data to examine for evidence of artifacts,” MacArthur said. "Until those things are available, this story is pure noise. The raw sequence data is absolutely critical.”

    “My best guess: this is contaminating DNA from a modern human, which is at least partly degraded and almost certainly mixed with DNA from other species,” MacArthur said. It would be easy for an inexperienced investigator to over-interpret a sample like that.”

    http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/18/3780240/why-is-bigfoot-eating-bagels

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story