Robert Lindsay Compares Sierra Kills Bigfoot Hair To Erickson Project's Randy Brisson Bigfoot Hair Samples


Canadian Randy Brisson who is well-known for his involvement in the Erickson Project has sent several hair samples to Dr. Melba Ketchum for the Bigfoot DNA project. Robert Lindsay believes the hairs on the Bigfoot steak taken from the Sierra Kills looks similar to Brisson's Bigfoot hair samples. Here's what Lindsay wrote on his blog on Sunday:

Why I released the Sierra Kills drawings and photo. The release of the artistic drafts of the two Bigfoots from the Sierra Kills and the photo of a hide skinned from the Bigfoot steak from the same Kills has caused a lot of controversy. A lot of people are saying that I didn’t have permission to release them.

One of the main problems is that I don’t even know who the copyright holder is on the drawings and the photo. If I don’t know who these people are, how can I contact them to ask them if I can post their stuff? It’s impossible.

The drawings and the photo or photos have been floating around the higher echelons of the Bigfoot community for a long time now. I have had them for two months.

I got them from someone along with the drawing of the head of the male Bigfoot from the Kills. My source gave me permission to post the head of the male, but soon after, I lost touch with them. I sent them multiple emails for two months trying to get ahold of them, but they had dropped off the face of the Earth. Apparently they have cut off all contact with me.

Now I have a problem. I have an agreement not to publish via someone who has stopped speaking to me. I honor agreements with folks who stay in contact with me. I tear up agreements with folks who quit talking to me. Since he quit talking to me, I felt I was no longer bound by our agreement. My agreement to publish or not was with the source, not the copyright holders, whoever they may be.

There’s a problem here. I am a journalist. We believe that information wants to be free. We pretty much want to publish just about everything unless there is some privacy reason not to.

We believe in the public’s right to know. We don’t believe in withholding valuable information from the public. What the public has a right to know is a very controversial matter, and I’m not sure the public needs to know about everyone’s private lives. But information like I published is the sort of thing that the Bigfoot community has a right to know.

I don’t believe in creating works of important art and then sticking them in your drawer forever so no one can see them. These are important graphics, and the Bigfoot community has a right to see them. They do not deserve to be shoved into a drawer somewhere where none of us can ever see them. There’s way too much information withheld from us already.

There have been some loud complaints from folks saying that I have no right to publish these items. Some are coming from folks who are in deep with the Ketchum Project and others are coming from folks in deep with the Erickson Project. Two groups shrouded in secrecy who have been withholding stuff from us forever.

Compare the hide from the Bigfoot steak (Shall we call it the Bigfoot hide?) to other photos of Bigfoot hair. It would be nice if someone could put these together into some sort of a montage. All of these hair samples have tested positive as Bigfoot by DNA.
"Here is the Bigfoot hide from the Sierra Kills for comparison. Note the globule of fat in the upper right of the photo. This was from defleshing the hide. There is also an aberration in the lower left that looks like blood or bloody tissue of some sort." - Robert Lindsay

"White Bigfoot hairs from Randy Brisson gathered in Golden Ears Park in British Colombia. Compare with the kinky hairs seen in the Bigfoot hide above." - Robert Lindsay

"A closeup of the hair from one of Brisson’s sample. Note the kinky nature of the hairs somewhat resembling pubic hair or spermatozoa." - Robert Lindsay

"Grey hair from Randy Brisson gathered in Golden Ears Park in British Colombia. Note the kinky nature of the hair, almost like pubic hair." - Robert Lindsay

"Blond hair from Randy Brisson gathered in Golden Ears Park in British Colombia. This one is more wavy, but it still resembles the hair on the hide." - Robert Lindsay

"Reddish hair from Randy Brisson gathered in Golden Ears Park in British Colombia. More the wavy type here." - Robert Lindsay

Comments

  1. damn i was hoping you would use one of my things for once lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nothing to see here people please move along. more BS and no BF.

      Delete
    2. Unscientific crap! You can only compare and identify hairs by looking at the shaft under a light-microscope or DNA. Saying one looks like the other is completely meaningless.....or as they say in Bigfootland, "proof".

      Delete
  2. Have you guys found any Mothman hair yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ketchum is including it in her sasquatch study

      Delete
    2. Good, Mothman needs more publicity.

      Delete
    3. I am happy to report that Mothman is performing Shakespeare off Broadway, and has a new PR firm.

      Delete
    4. off Broadway is going to be destroyed?!? Damn that Harbinger of doom!

      Delete
  3. How about the Lisbon Goon ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Robby is calling himself a journalist now, isn't that cute? Just a phase I'm sure, next week he will be a Fireman. John

    ReplyDelete
  5. Brisson's samples seem consistent with each other, but they don't look like they match that well with the hair on Smeja's steak.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think they are consistent with "each other" BUT I do think that the last image of hair pictured above(belonging to Brissom) does seem to have a likeness to the hair on the "steak". Not identical obviously (due to size) but I bet if you'd pull a patch of hair from the steak it would share a likeness with the hair in the bottom picture belonging to Brissom.

      Delete
  6. Ketchum? whos that? oh is that the lady in texas that said she had a dna study 3 YEARS AGO? but didnt..more bullshit

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. she mixed cat and horse samples with human DNA and presto! a new species that science scoffs at was "born"

      Delete
    2. Ketchum failed, look for the blame game to begin in the next few months.

      Delete
  7. Thomas Steenburg caught Brisson hoaxing by throwing rocks and called him out on it.

    So anything off of Brisson is dubious at best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, that is bad. He also has a ridiculous hoaxed photo of a bigfoot's head on top of a tree trunk.

      bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2011/12/what-randy-brisson-is-known-for.html

      Delete
    2. Anon 8:21,


      Thanks for the link. This Brissom guy is a hoaxer. Case closed.

      Delete
  8. WHAT ABOUT LIZARD MAN?WHAT IS THAT ABOUT

    ReplyDelete
  9. Steenburg is known here for his lies, He will do anything to get his name out there another book.
    he Does not even belive in bigfoot. I guess he knows more the the DNA does. Robert,D mission B.C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could we see some proof of that please?

      I just ask, as this is the first I have ever heard of TS lieing, so I'm curious.

      Delete
  10. A little research on this Brissom guy has lead me to believe he is NOTHING more than a hoaxer.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Brisson is a proven hoaxer by Tom Steenberg. Why would Lindsay want to compare his supposed evidence to that? These newbies need to do some background checks. Good Grief...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Definite hoaxer. He's on "The List". Nothing he ever does will be taken serious EVER AGAIN. He did it to himself, they all do. Then they think they can hide for a while and then pop up with another hoax and that nobody will question them. What sad people. It has to be a mental problem.

      Delete
    2. ^ if anyone has a mental problem, it's Rob Lindsay. plus, all of his fans have mental problems. why those dumb-asses exist is beyond me.

      Delete
  12. I've always found Thomas Steenburg to be very honest and forthright. No one can seriously claim otherwise, especially without evidence and posting anonymously.

    Can someone post a link to the supposed Brisson hoax activities? And I don't mean that dubious head on a stump photo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, the "dubious" head on a stump is all you need. Case closed. Reeks of a hoax.

      Delete
    2. http://grandcherokee.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=hot&thread=489&page=1

      Delete
    3. Anon 10:06,

      That link is bad. Takes you nowhere.

      Delete
    4. just google randy brisson rocks Bigfoot, and scroll. You will see this grand Cherokee URL. ts a forum, and in this thread a group of footers are calling him out.

      Delete
  13. Notice all these post are from the West Coast Sasquatch bunch, Check them out. Brisson didnt want them around so they made up lies, Fools. The DNA will speak for it self, Robert, mission B.C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well saying you ingored the above and posting again I shall ask this once more.

      Steenburg is known here for his lies, He will do anything to get his name out there another book.
      he Does not even belive in bigfoot. I guess he knows more the the DNA does. Robert,D mission B.C.


      Could we see some proof of that please?

      I just ask, as this is the first I have ever heard of TS lieing, so I'm curious.

      Delete
  14. "There’s a problem here. I am a journalist."

    Nuff said, game over.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story